Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth   Tuesday, August 14 2001   Volume 01 : Number 576




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:05:14 -0700
From: Bob Forrest <bforrest@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
> Anyone who has installed the Ground Control system. How difficult of
an install is it. Just a matter of taking out the struts, adding the
sleeves and springs and reinstalling? Or is that vastly
oversimplified? (I already know how to take out the struts)
> Ryan Peterson
> www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp
- -----------------------

Dennis Bretton documented the entire process, with pictures, 'what
tools you need', etc.  It's on our website at:
www.Team3S.com/FAQ-GCinstall.htm

Best,

Forrest

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:12:24 -0400
From: "Michael D. Crose" <ncsu4me@hotmail.com>
Subject: Team3S: Hesitation at less than 50% throttle

When I am accelerating up to speed through second and third gears there is a
hesitation between 2,500-3,000 RPMs.  The hesitation sometimes occurs twice
in this RPM range.  It only occurs with less than 50% throttle and it feels
like I let up on the gas but then when it passes ~3,000 RPMs it returns to
pulling smoothly.

At first I thought the clutch might be slipping, but it doesn't occur at
WOT.  Any ideas?

Michael D. Crose
1992 VR-4
Test pipe, FIPK

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Ryan,
I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm

For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my
web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm

So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I
thought it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and
so started with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so).
Those springs were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it
could make you car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the
ECS is Sport mode the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass
every little bump in the road up to the driver. I then installed 500
lb/in springs. Not really much difference.

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
expands.

I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS
struts/shocks in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the
Tein suspension. There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup,
except I like the car about 1" lower than stock.

Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
springs are?

Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?

Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
To: "Stealth List" <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Anyone who has installed the Ground Control system. How difficult of
an install is it. Just a matter of taking out the struts, adding the
sleeves and springs and reinstalling? Or is that vastly
oversimplified? (I already know how to take out the struts)

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:49:17 -0400
From: "Michael D. Crose" <ncsu4me@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Hesitation at less than 50% throttle

SJ,

>When was the last time you changed your plugs and/or wires?

I changed the plugs (NGK) and wires (Stock) along with the rest of the 60k
mile service less than 6,000 miles ago.

Michael D. Crose

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:53:57 -0500
From: "cody" <overclck@starband.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

I wasn't impressed when we installed them on my friends Mazda on the
recommended spring rates...  Also had a bouncy ride (which I know is
attributable to the strut), but this was tooo bouncy...  It was just as
bad as when my friend with a '94 Talon cut an inch and a half off his
stock springs...  I also rode in a friends Mazda that had Intrax
springs, also with stock shocks, and there was very little bounce...
Both were good and working shocks...  I think honestly, for us 3/S
people, my personal recommendation is to either go Intrax/Eibach
"trapped" springs, or go all out with the Tein setup...

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Jeff Lucius
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:32 AM
To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


Ryan,
I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm

For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my
web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm

So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I
thought it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and
so started with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so).
Those springs were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it
could make you car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the
ECS is Sport mode the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass
every little bump in the road up to the driver. I then installed 500
lb/in springs. Not really much difference.

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
expands.

I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS
struts/shocks in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the
Tein suspension. There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup,
except I like the car about 1" lower than stock.

Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
springs are?

Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?

Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
To: "Stealth List" <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Anyone who has installed the Ground Control system. How difficult of
an install is it. Just a matter of taking out the struts, adding the
sleeves and springs and reinstalling? Or is that vastly
oversimplified? (I already know how to take out the struts)

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:32:09 -0500
From: "cody" <overclck@starband.net>
Subject: Team3S: 2nd Gen Headlights in a 1st Gen

Well, got my projector style (NON-POP-UP!!!!) Headlights for my 1st Gen.


Regardless, I need some help from someone who has done the conversion.
I have a bracket that seems to be in the way.  Of course, I can't really
tell because my carbon fiber hood won't be here until Thursday.  Does
anyone have pictures of the process?  I think I am going to have to cut
out a small bracket in order to make it all fit correctly, but would
like some pointers.  Of course, I could just be being stupid and not
seeing how they fit correctly...

Any help?

- -Cody


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:28:53 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Valvoline SynPower Synthetic Brake Fluid

> Well Erik?   Did you bleed out the entire old brake fluid and
> then replace with the SynPower Synthetic stuff??

Yes, I went through 1.5 quarts to be sure.  Previous fluid was from the
factory.

> How'd the SynPower peform??  Did you cook 'em pretty good?? 

;-)   Now that's a silly question, now isn't it?  <Insert Geoff's "I told
you so" here>  I didn't completely toast it, but after completely cooling
down and doing some street driving, I definitely have more pedal travel and
a "spongy" feel.  The fluid DID, however, last the day at the track (91 F
and 60% humidity - very unusual for WA) consisting of 6 15-20 minute
sessions.  A few hot laps into my last session, I was experimenting with
speed/braking on the long front straight and held WOT through the 1st
braking cone and then STOOD on the brakes from 115 to get it down to the 35
or so needed to make the corner.  No fade, and the blood pooled in the front
of my face.  I made the corner, too :-)  I didn't notice the sponginess or
increased pedal travel until after driving home 30 miles on the freeway at
more sedate speeds and brake/underhood temperatures.

- --Erik

P.S.  track report coming, but I have this "work" stuff to do for now,
especially after taking Friday off :-)

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:06:19 -0400
From: Marc Jonathan Jacobs <Marc.Jacobs@usa.alcatel.com>
Subject: Team3S: Team3s: Rebuild or Replace Alternator?

I am trying to decide whether to rebuild or replace my alternator on my
'94 VR-4 with 115K miles.  Here are the prices according to Rockville
Mitsu with List and Sale price.  Has anyone done this before, or does
everyone just replace their alternator?  I was forced to buy a rebuilt
one this weekend, but it was $265 from Advanced Auto Parts.  I can get
$65 core return, or buy the Regulator for $140 and rebuild it myself.
Can I return the alternator now that it is already used for 500 miles?
MD197470     ALTERNA       $ 328.45      $ 262.76
MD611743     REGULATOR     $ 174.38      $ 139.50
Thanks in advance.
- --
Marc J. Jacobs '94 Blue VR-4
xDSL Hardware Development
Alcatel, USA     (919) 850-6386

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:31:00 -0700
From: "BlackLight" <BlackLight@Planetice.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Wow, and I had my heart set on the GC's. Is it really that bad? I wanted
the exact same thing, about stock feel, but just lower, but I wanted
lower than an inch, so I was going to get the GC's and basically max out
how low they would go while still being in spec for camber. I didn't
want to get Intrax because of what I have heard about having to modify
the rear suspension to get the camber in spec, but I may do that now if
the GC's are really that bad. Who else has GC's that has this problem,
or does not have the problem?

Matt Nelson
1994 RT TT
Computer Sales Consultant
Gateway Computers, Salem OR
Work Phone 503-587-7113
BlackLight@Planetice.Net
www.BlackLight.5u.com

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of cody
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:54 AM
To: 'Jeff Lucius'; team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


I wasn't impressed when we installed them on my friends Mazda on the
recommended spring rates...  Also had a bouncy ride (which I know is
attributable to the strut), but this was tooo bouncy...  It was just as
bad as when my friend with a '94 Talon cut an inch and a half off his
stock springs...  I also rode in a friends Mazda that had Intrax
springs, also with stock shocks, and there was very little bounce...
Both were good and working shocks...  I think honestly, for us 3/S
people, my personal recommendation is to either go Intrax/Eibach
"trapped" springs, or go all out with the Tein setup...

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Jeff Lucius
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:32 AM
To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


Ryan,
I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm

For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my web
page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm

So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I thought
it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and so started
with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so). Those springs
were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it could make you
car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the ECS is Sport mode
the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass every little bump in
the road up to the driver. I then installed 500 lb/in springs. Not
really much difference.

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the car
goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull back a
little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves up;
suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and just
sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is expanding.
They can only "push back" when the suspension is compressing. So when
the car goes over big dips, there is nothing controlling the suspension
except the struts/shock as the suspension expands.

I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS struts/shocks
in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the Tein suspension.
There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup, except I like the
car about 1" lower than stock.

Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
springs are?

Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?

Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
To: "Stealth List" <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:11 PM
Subject: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Anyone who has installed the Ground Control system. How difficult of an
install is it. Just a matter of taking out the struts, adding the
sleeves and springs and reinstalling? Or is that vastly oversimplified?
(I already know how to take out the struts)

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 16:53:09 GMT
From: aa2345@wayne.edu
Subject: Team3S: octane booster

Hello,

I was wondering what is the best way to boost octane?  Here in California, the
highest octane they currently sell is 91 (that sucks).  I am currently running
a boost controller set at 1 bar, but see it spike (for a small fraction of a
seccond) to 1.05 ~1.1 all the time, but it usually holds .9 ~ 1, and sometimes
even drops to as low as .75 close to redline, depending what gear I am in.  My
question is that running this high boost, is octane a problem?  I am from
Michigan, where I am going back in about a month, in which we have 94 octane
gas, and from some tests that somebody did, there is no knock using 94 octane
gas, but 91 octane, I don't know.  I have been using octane booster for the
past 2 months, ever since I came here in California, but from what I have
heard, those 4~7 points of octane boost is really 4~7 tenths of an octane
point, which means that you don't add much octane to the gas at all.  Is the
best way to raise octane just by mixing (half and half) say 100 octane gas with
91 octane, to get something like 95.5 octane gas?  I am just wondering what
some of the other people are doing where only like 91 or 92 octane gas exists,
and I am especially interested in hearing from people who have had a boost
controller in their cars for a prollonged period of time (say over a year) and
saw no reliability problems with the engine due to the low octane.  Thanks all
in advance.


John Raicu
94 Yellow
TT.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Team3S: Motul600 Brake Fluid Sale addition..

Ive just been informed that pricing on cases is up to $90/case from
$80/case.

Orders already placed at the $80/case level are -not- being asked to pony
up or lose the sale..they will still be shipped $10 or not.

Thank you..please drive thru

*New & Improved: http://www.speedtoys.com *

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:39:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: David Littau <littau@cs.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Team3s: Rebuild or Replace Alternator?

As far as I know, most places will not give a refund on electrical parts,
so you probably cannot return the alternator.

david

On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Marc Jonathan Jacobs wrote:

> I am trying to decide whether to rebuild or replace my alternator on my
> '94 VR-4 with 115K miles.  Here are the prices according to Rockville
> Mitsu with List and Sale price.  Has anyone done this before, or does
> everyone just replace their alternator?  I was forced to buy a rebuilt
> one this weekend, but it was $265 from Advanced Auto Parts.  I can get
> $65 core return, or buy the Regulator for $140 and rebuild it myself.
> Can I return the alternator now that it is already used for 500 miles?
> MD197470     ALTERNA       $ 328.45      $ 262.76
> MD611743     REGULATOR     $ 174.38      $ 139.50
> Thanks in advance.
> --
> Marc J. Jacobs '94 Blue VR-4
> xDSL Hardware Development
> Alcatel, USA     (919) 850-6386

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:09:19 EDT
From: Sportsmobile101@aol.com
Subject: Team3S: Where do i buy a chep fuel pump??

Hi everyone, i think my fuel pump just died on me, and i called the dealer and they want $500 bucks for that lil thing, where should i go for better pricing? Please Advice.  Thanx in advace.
Christian
92 SL

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:10:44 EDT
From: Sportsmobile101@aol.com
Subject: Team3S: Just correcting myself *Cheap* Fuel pump. Thanx.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:16:13 -0400
From: "Dennis and Anita Moore" <stealth@quixnet.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: 2nd Gen Headlights in a 1st Gen

This prompts a couple questions:
Do the stock 2nd gen headlights illuminate the road better than stock 1st
gen, or is the benefit purely aesthetic?

Any educated guesses as to whether or not one could mount the light
assemblies from a 2nd gen into the pop-up mechanism of a 1st gen?  I'd think
not, but haven't had an opportunity to study a 2nd gen recently.

Dennis
93 Stealth ES

- ----- Original Message -----
From: cody <overclck@starband.net>
To: Starnet <stealth@stls.verio.net>; <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 1:32 PM
Subject: Team3S: 2nd Gen Headlights in a 1st Gen


> Well, got my projector style (NON-POP-UP!!!!) Headlights for my 1st Gen.
>
>
> Regardless, I need some help from someone who has done the conversion.
> I have a bracket that seems to be in the way.  Of course, I can't really
> tell because my carbon fiber hood won't be here until Thursday.  Does
> anyone have pictures of the process?  I think I am going to have to cut
> out a small bracket in order to make it all fit correctly, but would
> like some pointers.  Of course, I could just be being stupid and not
> seeing how they fit correctly...
>
> Any help?
>
> -Cody

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:03:19 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: Team3S: Young punk kids 2, old farts 0, one DNF

As I have predicted all along, once the kids start coming out with their
fast reflexes and lack of fear, they will stomp us old farts. It happened
at Heartland Park: Mike Willis and Flash were the fastest, with 2:14 laps,
and the two old farts -- Chuck Willis and me (Rich the Old Poop) brought up
the rear with 2:15s. Jim Floyd broke his car early, so he gets a bye this
time.

Let's hope this encourages all you kids to bring your cars out to play.
(Cathy, my bee-utiful daughter, are you listening?)

LESSONS LEARNED

When you have five more-or-less identical cars on track at the same event,
you learn lots. For example:

1. Use Motul brake fluid.
This was discussed in an earlier post.

2. Yoko 032R tires are just as good as Kuhmos.

3.  Big Reds are better than Stillen/Brembo upgrades

Although Mike Willis was faster than me by a second a lap, I could
consistently outbrake him and his dad, Chuck Willis, into the corners. Mike
and I did lead/follow for several laps, and when he led, it was always the
same: Because he has a boost controller, he could pull away from me out of
corners, gaining maybe 15-50 yards on each straightaway. I made it up under
braking, getting it all back so that I entered each turn on his butt. Ergo,
the Big Reds are better brakes.

(And I don't even have the best Big Red setup!  Flash has brakes that will
put you through the windshield, Jack! I have never been in a car that
stopped like Flash's car: It's like hitting a brick wall. Maybe it's
because he runs race pads on the rears and I don't, but his car flat STOPS!!)

As for Yokos v Kuhmos, I could follow Mike through the turns at exactly the
same speed, neither gaining nor losing time. That means that his Yokos --
which some of us (ahem) have called "school tires"  -- stick just as good
as Kuhmos, which are supposed to be a superior tire. (Mike and I both have
GC suspensions with 550 front springs).

I am sick and tired of cording Kuhmos left and right, so I am ordering
another set of Yoko 032R tires to replace the three Kuhmos I corded this
weekend (I can see the cords just below the surface on the fourth tire, so
it's ready to go, too). (BTW, the Kuhmos are certainly good tires, but they
have no wear indicators, so ya never know how much tire is left.)

SMOOTH IS FAST
Chuck Willis gives the best demonstration of how smooth is fast. He was
slower than us by a second or so a lap, but when you ride with him you see
a master at work: He doesn't punish the car. He shifts at 5000, lifts early
for braking, stabs the brakes sanely, keeps it under 100 mph on the
straights, and takes no risks. Yet he turns into corners at amazingly high
speeds, keeps the car nicely balanced while it's skeetering at the limit,
shaves off a second here and a second there, and his seemingly slower pace
is only a second or so off the lap times of those of us who are divebombing
the course, pulling 7000 rpm shift points, and slamming on the brakes at
120+. If Chuck turned up the wick, he'd smoke all of us.

If you ever get a chance to run with us, take a few laps with Chuck.

BREAKING BRAKES
Heartland Park is a brake-eater, so when you come to play, bring spare pads.

I ate up a set of rear pads. They were stock pads (lifetime warranty!
Wonder what they will say when I bring them back with only four days use on
them?)
Flash went through a set of Pagid Orange front pads. They had been through
a couple of events, so it was just a matter of time.
Mike cracked BOTH of his Stillen drilled rotors. They cracked right through
the drilled part. The cracked rotors contributed to his eating a set of
front pads, too. Fortunately, it all happened late Sunday afternoon, so he
didn't miss much track time.
We had to bleed out my Ford fluid (had to do it twice before we got it all
out) and replace it with Motul before I could make it through an entire
session.

Needless to say, it looked like the Mitsubishi Brake Shop for most of the
weekend.

We still don't know what's wrong with Jim's car. He was in his second
session when something went CLANG in the front end, the steering wheel
turned halfway around, and he limped back to the paddock. He stayed over to
check with a front end shop on Monday morning, so I guess we'll hear about
it in a few days. Jim, Mike and Flash spent a lot of time under the car,
poking and prodding, but they didn't find anything seriously wrong. Chuck
let Jim drive his car for the rest of the sessions (what a guy!!).

As noted, Chuck does not run his car hard. Chuck did not have a single
problem with brakes, tires, overheating, or anything else this entire
weekend, and both he and Jim drove the car. There must be a lesson there
somewhere.

RUNNING WITH THE BIG BOYS
Three of us (Chuck, Mike and I) got put into Group 4, with the instructors.

We had about 20 cars in our group, and there were 11 Group 1 cars, so at
least 11 of those cars were instructors. Other cars in  group 4 included
race-prepped cars, such as a Speedvision world challenge (or whatever that
series is) Saleen Mustang, 911s with tall wings, and lots of cars with
stickers and lettering. Some of them would come up on us like a rocket ship
on the straights (like the Saleen), while others would catch us in the
twisty bits (like race prepped 914s). The 914s and such couldn't pass us on
the straights unless we let them, because they had no horsepower to speak
of, but we all let them by. They caught up to us because they didn't have
to slow down for corners (at least it seemed that way. Dang German go karts!).

Later, they merged Groups 4 and 5, so we got to run with even more
race-prepped cars, such as Vipers and stuff.

These were all some really serious folks, with years of experience, very
expensive cars, and lots of trailer queens and cars with no license plates.
I heard a little derision in the rest room about the Mitsubishis that were
"getting in the way." Hmm...we'll have to do something about that. We need
some serious cars of our own out there.

Once we solved my brake fluid problem, I was staying with the big boys, and
getting passed just by the race-prepped cars, so I was fairly happy with
the weekend. I've run 2:12 at HP before, but not in such intense heat.

The absolute best part, though, was having five cars there, with assorted
friends, family, tent, bbq, folding chairs, coolers, and our own instructor
(Chuck).  I'm ready to do it again. How about October 20-21 for the Audi
Quattro event at Heartland Park in Topeka, Kansa? Come join us. Let's have
TEN cars this time!

Rich/old poop.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 17:15:03 -0500
From: "Richard Fennell" <realmstl@home.com>
Subject: Fw: Team3S: Hesitation at less than 50% throttle

Did you check the TPS?

Rich
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael D. Crose" <ncsu4me@hotmail.com>
To: <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:12 AM
Subject: Team3S: Hesitation at less than 50% throttle


> When I am accelerating up to speed through second and third gears there is
a
> hesitation between 2,500-3,000 RPMs.  The hesitation sometimes occurs
twice
> in this RPM range.  It only occurs with less than 50% throttle and it
feels
> like I let up on the gas but then when it passes ~3,000 RPMs it returns to
> pulling smoothly.
>
> At first I thought the clutch might be slipping, but it doesn't occur at
> WOT.  Any ideas?
>
> Michael D. Crose
> 1992 VR-4
> Test pipe, FIPK

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Team3S: Re: 3S-Racers: Young punk kids 2, old farts 0, one DNF

> I ate up a set of rear pads. They were stock pads (lifetime warranty!
> Wonder what they will say when I bring them back with only four days use on
> them?)
- ---
You should upgrade..your bias is messed up causing the fronts to do more
work than they should, because the rears arent holding thier own here.
Free delivery!  *you know what I mean*

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:04:52 -0500
From: "bdtrent" <bdtrent@netzero.net>
Subject: Team3S: Wheel Spacer Help

Anyone care to comment on the foolhardiness of using the stock stud length
with 3/16 thk. spacers?  Otherwise, I'm not perfectly clear on whether or
not it's necessary to remove the entire steering nuckle to get the old studs
out and the longer studs in.  I very much want to avoid popping the lower
control arm and steering arm ball joints if I can help it.  Is there a
consensus on the best way to tackle this little dilemma?  Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Davet/92TT

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:57:07 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: Team3S: RE: 3S-Racers: Young punk kids 2, old farts 0, one DNF

Yes we all had a most fantastic time.  Let us not forget that we came from
Boulder, CO; Houston, TX; Cedar Rapids, IA; Pittsburgh, PA and wherever Mike
is from.  Combine those mileages and ... well ... it is mind-boggling.  I
drove 955 miles just to GET to the track or just under 2,200 miles
round-trip. <big grin>

We must have passed two dozen other 3/S cars getting here so if anybody
lives between PA and KS and was driving East on I-70 Friday or West on I-70
Monday then you missed me.  I met a kid in a gas station near Topeka who
owns a 1994 Green VR-4.  We all went to dinner on Sunday at the Outback and
happened to see another green VR-4 in the lot (Kansas plate "SAG") who was
not part of our group.  Where do they all come from.  There was a Stealth ES
for sale at the track even.  Belonged to a corner worker.

Incidentally, we were about to call this the First Ever VR-4 Kansas track
day since four second gen and one first gen VR-4 were in attendance.  Stay
tuned for pictures when they get developed.

I know the CA guys have their days at Thunderhill and Laguna Seca and a few
at Road America (WI), and Steve Lasher at Road Atlanta (GA), so let's get
some more out there to the great tracks (Mid-Ohio, Watkins Glen, Summit
Point, VIR, Lime Rock, etc.).  Not only was it fun to partake in a driving
event (it is not considered racing really) it helped to diagnose problems
such as a loose front anti-sway bar, if a Mustang wheel fits over the Big
Reds, where to place jackstands under a car, etc.  Lots of good technical
knowledge this past weekend.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4
www.speedtoys.com/~dschilberg


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:02:38 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: Team3S: RE: Mustang wheels

> it helped to diagnose problems
>such as a loose front anti-sway bar, if a Mustang wheel fits over the Big
>Reds,

No they don't. We tried a 2001 Cobra SVT wheel, and although the wheel
pattern matches, the spokes do not clear the calipers (by a long shot!).
The Cobra guy said maybe a 1998 wheel would fit, because it has a big
offset, but there wasn't a 98 to be found. Other Mustang wheels are four
bolts, so they don't fit either. If somebody has a buddy with a 98 SVT
Mustang, please check it out. Those wheels are only $150 each.

Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Team3S: To EVERYONE that lives on/near I80..

...between San Francisco and Chicago..

FREE DELIVERY of porterfield/motul pads/rotors!

You -have- to get your order in by noon PST Wednesday, you -have- to pay
via paypal, and you have to live on I80, or very near it.

I'll be glad to make a 5 minute stop on my road trip to Toronto early next
week..

The savings:  $10 cheaper because you dont have to pay a drop-ship fee
from porterfield, and additional savings because you only have to pay
shipping to my house in San Jose, CA...instead of all the way to you.

*New & Improved: http://www.speedtoys.com *

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:20:16 -0700
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Thanks Jeff. Very informative web page.  I think you've talked me out of the
GC system.

I disagree with the idea that the stock springs might act in both
directions. They are not "captured" in the context that they also work in
tension. They would have to be physically tied to the strut top and bottom
seats for this to happen. They are not, they just press against them. Plus,
I think this would be undesirable, as you want the suspension to press down
as far as possible and as fast as possible. Otherwise, the wheels would tend
to "float" over rough terrain rather than keep contact with the ground.

I didn't think it was possible to do as much to these engines as you've
done. Nice job!

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of Jeff Lucius
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:32 AM
To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


Ryan,
I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm

For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my
web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm

So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I
thought it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and
so started with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so).
Those springs were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it
could make you car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the
ECS is Sport mode the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass
every little bump in the road up to the driver. I then installed 500
lb/in springs. Not really much difference.

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
expands.

I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS
struts/shocks in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the
Tein suspension. There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup,
except I like the car about 1" lower than stock.

Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
springs are?

Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?

Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:30:40 -0500
From: "cody" <overclck@starband.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

I think the intent of the "captured" spring was that say you get your
car off the ground, well, the way the GC's are made, there will be
unsprung travel, meaning that if the car extends over how much the GC's
can extend, then there will be no spring factor whatsoever, leaving the
strut left to "crash down" on the GC's actual spring once the car starts
coming back down...  (Am I confusing anyone?)  With stock springs,
Eibach, or Intrax springs, this can never happen as the strut fully
extends while still under tension from the spring, and also having an
amount of pre-load on the spring also...

Not sure how this would affect anything...

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Ryan Peterson
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:20 PM
To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


Thanks Jeff. Very informative web page.  I think you've talked me out of
the
GC system.

I disagree with the idea that the stock springs might act in both
directions. They are not "captured" in the context that they also work
in
tension. They would have to be physically tied to the strut top and
bottom
seats for this to happen. They are not, they just press against them.
Plus,
I think this would be undesirable, as you want the suspension to press
down
as far as possible and as fast as possible. Otherwise, the wheels would
tend
to "float" over rough terrain rather than keep contact with the ground.

I didn't think it was possible to do as much to these engines as you've
done. Nice job!

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of Jeff Lucius
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:32 AM
To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


Ryan,
I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm

For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my
web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm

So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I
thought it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and
so started with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so).
Those springs were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it
could make you car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the
ECS is Sport mode the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass
every little bump in the road up to the driver. I then installed 500
lb/in springs. Not really much difference.

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
expands.

I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS
struts/shocks in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the
Tein suspension. There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup,
except I like the car about 1" lower than stock.

Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
springs are?

Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?

Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:49:39 -0700
From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Ok, my bad.

Ryan Peterson
www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp

- -----Original Message-----
From: cody [mailto:overclck@starband.net]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:31 PM
To: ryanp@crcwnet.com; team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?


I think the intent of the "captured" spring was that say you get your
car off the ground, well, the way the GC's are made, there will be
unsprung travel, meaning that if the car extends over how much the GC's
can extend, then there will be no spring factor whatsoever, leaving the
strut left to "crash down" on the GC's actual spring once the car starts
coming back down...  (Am I confusing anyone?)  With stock springs,
Eibach, or Intrax springs, this can never happen as the strut fully
extends while still under tension from the spring, and also having an
amount of pre-load on the spring also...

Not sure how this would affect anything...

- -Cody

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:42:15 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: Team3S: RE: 3S-Racers: RE: Mustang wheels

Rich -- How heavy were those wheels?  As heavy?  Lighter?  I would not want
to recommend a wheel that is aluminum instead of beefy steel or something.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-3sracers@speedtoys.com
[mailto:owner-3sracers@speedtoys.com]On Behalf Of Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 12:03 AM
To: 3sracers@speedtoys.com; Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: 3S-Racers: RE: Mustang wheels


> it helped to diagnose problems
>such as a loose front anti-sway bar, if a Mustang wheel fits over the Big
>Reds,

No they don't. We tried a 2001 Cobra SVT wheel, and although the wheel
pattern matches, the spokes do not clear the calipers (by a long shot!).
The Cobra guy said maybe a 1998 wheel would fit, because it has a big
offset, but there wasn't a 98 to be found. Other Mustang wheels are four
bolts, so they don't fit either. If somebody has a buddy with a 98 SVT
Mustang, please check it out. Those wheels are only $150 each.

Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:08:10 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Notes on Big Reds

Dave,

   At Heartland Park I saw Brad Bedell's first step at a two-piece rotor
that utilized the entire pad surface area.  I like that.  I should have put
those rotors on my car now that I think about it.  Anyway, a solution is out
there but it needs more testing before becoming a hit or a bomb.
   On your weights you failed to report one thing: sprung weight vs.
unsprung weight.  Who cars how much the Big Red caliper weighs (8#) since it
does not go round and round.  The rotor DOES go round and round so that is
more weight to stop.  Just FYI.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 with Big Reds and Porterfield rotors

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of bdtrent
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:18 PM
To: Team 3S
Subject: Team3S: Notes on Big Reds


For those interested, the big reds weigh approx. 1lb. more than the stock
front calipers.  The 2nd gen rotors weigh 18lbs. ea. vs. 15lbs. for the
first gen. rotors.  (It is worth noting how much more affective the cooling
vanes appear to be on the 2nd gen rotors).  Factor in the pads and brackets
and its safe to say the big red conversion adds at least 5lbs. per wheel.
Mostly trivial given the indicated benefits.  I was more concerned with the
fact that the 2nd gen. rotors appear to leave 5-10% of the big red pad
completely unused.  If our rotors were about a 1/4" wider, we would be
getting more of the full benefit of the Brembos.  Just some FYI as I embark
on the big red conversion journey.

Regards,
DaveT/92TT

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:12:46 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Hood Scoop for TT

Shane,

No, it makes sense now.  Sealing off the air box makes a different pressure
than under the hood.  Thanks for clarifying.  I'll stand by ready to see the
results.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of Shane Thoms
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 11:21 PM

No no, you guys are missing it.  The front "grabber" is sealed to a intake
or stuffing box.
The rear would be designed to evacuate the under hood air.  AS far as
pressure... dunno.  Just
thought a double ended scoop would be cool.


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:15:53 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: H & R Wheel Spacers

???  My Big Reds fit under factory 1995 18" wheels and 1999 17" wheels with
stock offsets.  Adding offset would only help any clearance problems since
it would space the wheel away from the rotors.  What else are we missing?  I
have all stock studs, hub, knuckle, etc.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 with Big Reds

- -----Original Message-----
From: bdtrent
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 4:38 PM

Does anyone know if it's nessesary to replace the factory wheel studs when
using the H & R 5mm offset wheel spacer?  The big reds won't clear the
aftermarket 18" wheels I'm using.

Regards,
DaveT/92TT


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:07:11 -0400
From: "Dg B" <dbretton@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

Hi Ryan,

   You are correct in your statement.  The springs are not tied to the
spring perches., so they cannot assist in slowing rarification (sp?) of the
strut.  However, the springs are designed such that their max height matches
the maximum extension that the struts may have.  That is, there should be no
noticible separation between the strut and the spring perches when the strut
is fully extended.  By doing this, the action of the spring is effectively
"tied" to the action of the strut on compression.

Regards,
   Dennis


>From: "Ryan Peterson" <ryanp@crcwnet.com>
>To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
>Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?
>Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:20:16 -0700
>
>Thanks Jeff. Very informative web page.  I think you've talked me out of
>the
>GC system.
>
>I disagree with the idea that the stock springs might act in both
>directions. They are not "captured" in the context that they also work in
>tension. They would have to be physically tied to the strut top and bottom
>seats for this to happen. They are not, they just press against them. Plus,
>I think this would be undesirable, as you want the suspension to press down
>as far as possible and as fast as possible. Otherwise, the wheels would
>tend
>to "float" over rough terrain rather than keep contact with the ground.
>
>I didn't think it was possible to do as much to these engines as you've
>done. Nice job!
>
>Ryan Peterson
>www.crcwnet.com/~ryanp
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
>Of Jeff Lucius
>Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 9:32 AM
>To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
>Subject: Re: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?
>
>
>Ryan,
>I have some tips for the GC kit at my web page below.
>http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-gc-springs.htm
>
>For those that want some info on R&Ring the struts/shocks look at my
>web page below.
>http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius8/j8-2-shockremoval.htm
>
>So far, I do not care for the GC adjustable-height spring kit. I
>thought it would be good to stay with close to stock spring rates and
>so started with 400 lb/in springs in front (stock is like 258 or so).
>Those springs were horrible. The car bounced down the road so bad it
>could make you car sick. That was in Tour mode with the ECS. With the
>ECS is Sport mode the bounce is fairly eliminated but the struts pass
>every little bump in the road up to the driver. I then installed 500
>lb/in springs. Not really much difference.
>
>Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
>thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
>stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
>car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
>back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
>expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
>up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
>just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
>expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
>compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
>controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
>expands.
>
>I am considering going to 700 lb/in springs, but I don't see how they
>can make the bounce any better - at least with stock ECS
>struts/shocks in Tour mode. So I am also considering going to the
>Tein suspension. There is really nothing wrong with the stock setup,
>except I like the car about 1" lower than stock.
>
>Does anyone know if the Tein Springs are "trapped" the way the stock
>springs are?
>
>Does anyone with Teins think the ride is too bouncy?
>
>Am I the only one who thinks the GC springs have too bouncy a ride?
>
>Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:20:13 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Ground Control - how hard to install?

I assume this "short GC spring not helping the suspension like stock" was
what the "helper springs" took care of ... like in the Tein setup.  This
aligns the springs when the car is up on jackstands and when there is no
weight on the wheel.  Can't say but that is why I keep looking forward to
the Teins (like two or three years away) instead of the GC stuff.  You get
what you pay for remember.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 with stock suspension

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lucius
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 12:32 PM

Reading through some old posts on this subject (thanks Matt J.) and
thinking about the problem, here's what I think the problem is. The
stock springs are "trapped" in the upper and lower "seats". When the
car goes up or down, the springs are involved - that is they pull
back a little when the car goes up (wheel goes down; suspension
expands) and push out a little when the car goes down (wheel moves
up; suspension compresses). The GC springs are shorter than stock and
just sit there. They cannot get involved when the suspension is
expanding. They can only "push back" when the suspension is
compressing. So when the car goes over big dips, there is nothing
controlling the suspension except the struts/shock as the suspension
expands.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

End of Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth V1 #576
***************************************