Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth Monday, March 1
2004 Volume 02 : Number
383
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:06:59 -0500
From: "Spawn" <
spawn@rochester.rr.com>
Subject:
Team3S: "Audio for
sale"
>
** Rockford Fosgate Power
> 1000a2 **
>
> This amp
retailed for $1,389. I bought it for $1,200. I'm selling
it
for
> $700. Here's the Specs:
>
>
· All measurements @ 14 volts unless
otherwise specified
>
>
· Frequency Response (4-ohm IHF Load,
20 Hz to 20 kHz, 1 kHz
Ref.):
> +0 dB, –.23 dB
>
>
· Phase Response (4-ohm IHF Load, 20
Hz to 20 kHz, 1 kHz Ref.) —
> Phase Warp Out: +19 degrees, –10.25
degrees
>
> ·
Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Below Rated Output, “A” weighted): 119 dB
>
>
· Distortion at Rated Output (@ 1 kHz):
0.041% @ 275 watts x 2
>
>
· Output Power (resistive) minimum output 20
Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%
THD+N,
> all channels driven into 4 ohms: 383.9 watts
x 2 @ 14 V; 317.4 watts x 2 @
> 12.8 V; 215.7 watts x 2 @ 10.5
V
>
> · Output Power
(resistive) minimum output 20 Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%
THD+N,
> all channels
driven into 2 ohms: 487.1 watts x 2 @ 14 V; 466 watts x 2 @
> 12.8
V; 340 watts x 2 @ 10.5V
>
>
· Output Power (4-ohm IHF Reactive Load @ 1%
THD+N @ 60 Hz
bridged):
> 973.6 watts x 1
>
>
· Crosstalk @ rated output, 20 Hz to 20 kHz:
–72.3 dB
>
> · Damping
Factor @ 100 Hz: 1737
>
>
· Voltage for Rated Output: 300mV to
6.1V
>
> · Idle Current
Draw: 1.4 amps
>
> ·
Current Draw @ 1/3 Maximum Power: 79 Amps @ 389 watts
>
>
· Efficiency @ 1/3 Maximum Power:
35%
>
> · Power-Up Noise:
14 dB SPL
>
> · Power-Down
Noise: 14.8 dB SPL
>
>
> The Power 1100a2 is a
two-channel power amp featuring gold plated
> connections, switchable
high- or low-pass crossovers with variable cutoff
> frequency, a
275-watt x 2 power rating into 4 ohms, and the classic
> Rockford
cheese-grater from hell
heatsink.
>
>
* Performance *
> Pansy, wimp, or wuss are not adjectives that
you’re likely to come across
> in descriptions of the 1100a2. However,
powerhouse or current hog fit the
> bill
> quite well. Driving
a 4-ohm reactive load, this beast produced nearly a
> kilowatt on our test
bench and nearly 1400 watts driving a 4-ohm resistive
> load with a
14.6 V supply. (Rockford Fosgate recommends the use of large
> power
capacitors to bolster the amplifier if you experience any problems
>
with your stock electrical system.) This isn’t to say that you’ll be
>
disappointed with its real-world performance, but we had to parallel
two
> power supplies just to feed this thing. Our normal test DC
supply has a
> current limit of about 120 amps, and it fell short by a
considerable
margin.
> Noise floor, crosstalk, and turn on/off
numbers are really
low.
>
>
* Connections &
> Adjustments*
> Connections to the 1100a2
include RCA inputs and outputs, a spade-type
> remote turn on connector,
and captive-style receptacles for speaker and
> power connections.
Adjustments include input sensitivity for each
channel,
> crossover
mode select, crossover cutoff frequency, bass boost, and Phase
>
Warp adjustment. The Phase Warp appears to be an all-pass delay.
This
might
> prove useful in a multi-speaker SPL setup. It would allow
for close phase
> matching of multiple woofers. This, in theory,
could allow for a higher
SPL
> at the frequency for which they were
adjusted. The limitation of this
> circuit is that it would only work at
one frequency, and it would have to
be
> fairly low — perhaps below 500
Hz in a
car.
>
>
>
** Clarion ProAudio Am/Fm/CD
> Receiver DRX9375R**
>
> I
paid $640 for this. I'm selling it for $300. This is one sweet
tuner.
> It has lots of cool options, I'll list a few. This unit has
RCA hookups
for
> a TV & Dvd player. You can hook a changer
up to this. Has a visual EQ.
And
> a bunch of different screen
savers to play with and look at. Not to
mention
> a detachable face for
extra security. And for us lazy people...a remote
> control.
This amp is a ProAudio tuner THEREFORE has NO INTERNAL POWER
>
SOURCE. If you're not familiar with audio ESPECIALLY ProAudio
equipment
> then I'll break this down for you. Basically there's no
internal
amplifier
> in this unit so you HAVE to have a amp to make
this unit work. If you try
> and run it without one...they'll be NO
SOUND. I wasn't aware if this when
I
> bought it and I didn't
have any amps at the time...so I learned VERY
>
quickly.
>
>
>
** (2) 1st Gen SoloBaric
Kicker
> SL710 Subwoofers
**
>
> I paid $335 each for these. But I'm selling these
for way less. $220
each
> or both for $400. These are Dual
4 OHM Voicecoil Subs. These were the
> turning stone design for
subs. These are the high end square shaped
> subwoofers. They
take up less cubic space(When making a box) than a round
> sub would and
hit WAY harder than any other 10" subwoofer. These subs are
> rated
between 500-600 Watts each. So you can push these babies hard.
And
> the special design for these subs make them able to flex alot more
than
any
> other normal round subwoofer. Also I have the awesome
looking grills for
> these subs too. I'm selling these for $15 each
or if you buy both
> subwoofers and want both grills I'll give it all to
you for $420.
>
> With this sound system I've
won:
>
> 1st Place Sound System @ Ocean City Maryland 2002
(ECG2002)
> Best of Show @ Ocean City Maryland 2002
(ECG2002)
> 1st Place Sound & Entertainment @ Rochester NY (NEG
II) 2002
> Best install @ Signature Audio's Soundoff (Batavia NY)
2002
> 1st Place Sound System @ Rochester NY (NEG III)
2003
> Best of Show @ Rochester NY (NEG III)
2003
>
> Also at Custom Radio's Soundoff (Buffalo NY) I hit
148.6 Decibels with
this
> setup. Now the box I have these subs
in is designed more for show so it's
> about 3/4 the size it's supposed to
be. If this box was made for the
right
> specs for these speakers
then I would have hit more. This is just a vague
> idea of what this
stuff can do.
>
> I have pictures if anyone's interested in any of
this stuff. Email
> inquiries to:
spawn@rochester.rr.com>
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 7:59:42
+0000
From: <
swoosh4435@fuse.net>
Subject:
Team3S: FOR SALE
1994 Dodge Stealth R/T
A list of mods are on my page
at
www.cardomain.com/id/94steathrt
Asking 7,000 o.b.o
Really fast car with alot of potential to be
faster
120k miles on it.. did 60k tune up at 105k miles (belts,water
pump,timing belt, new alternator, clutch master cylinder, slave cylinder, and a
new stage 2 clutch with 500miles on it) also have a compustar alarm with remote
start and keyless entry.
I live in the Cincinnati area, but would be willing
to meet half way or somehthing
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:46:59
+0100
From: "Roger Gerl" <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject:
Team3S: Qs on water injection - Answers from ERL
Long time ago that this
thread was active. I now have contact to ERL again
who wll answer soem Q's.
Especially as Dan had a misunderstanding of the
flow rates. Here's the first
answer from Richard at ERL :
-
----------------------------------------------
Roger,
There were a
few in-accuracy on the post regarding pressure (re: Dan
Labonte's post) . The
standard aquamist pump can maintain 90psi at
300cc/min. It was originally
designed for the WRC engines at 300BHP. The
flow rate of the aquamist pump
can be doubled for $20 quick easily.
Snow performance's water pump is
made by Shurflo? -I think. We also supply
Shurflo pumps for high flow
applications, should anyone be requesting a high
flow system from us. There
are many water injection suppliers who also use
the same pump, Carroll
Supercharging Inc, plus a handful of DIY based
system. They are all priced
between 250-500dollars.
Anyone can buy a Shurflo pump from
www.Notherntool.com, price
ranging
between $69.99-$110 dollars. Add a few connectors, a hobb switch and
a water
jet from any oil heater suppliers - you end up with a water injection
system
perform far better than the aquamist system - IN FLOW RATE
TERMS. The best
place for getting information on a low budget system is
by visiting
www.h20injection.com.
There is no
point for us to supply a simple Shurflo based system where most
people can
almost make a DIY WI system under 120 dollars. The
important
question one should really ask is: Is a high flow WI system a
better
system?
If that is the case, then one should just couple up a
mechanical pump to the
engine and you can almost get unlimited amount of
water delivery for less
than 20 dollars - remember you can buy a simple water
delivery attachment
that is driven by an electric drill? Attach it to
you crank belt, the
delivery will be linear to your engine speed, no need to
have any electronic
control at all. Load related delivery can be
controlled directly by engine
vacuum via a raising rate pressure regulator.
It will cost you another 25
dollars.
The point I am trying to make
here is, since we made considerable effort and
attempt to manufacture a well
engineered system for the more demanding users
over the last ten years and
have brought some creditability back to the
water injection concept.
Just as the market has begun to turn slowly
in-favour of water injection as
opposed to the nick name of " band-aid to
poor tuning". Everyone seemed
to be jumping on the band wagon. We have no
objections on that what so
ever. I see it as a positive trend.
The most unfair part, in my opinion
is, people on the chat rooms has often
overlooked the very
essence that makes a water injection work to it full
potential. Every
aspect of the delivery machine must be considered to be
equally important -
not just delivery rate. Diagnostics capabilities and
flow monitoring is
vital to a healthy engine. No one can make a perfect
system that never breaks
down - but if the system has an early faulty
detection system incorporated -
the engine will live much longer. At
present, some people would only be
interested on how much more their system
can flow compared to the aquamist
system and how much cheaper it is. Would
you risk your engine on
a system that cannot provide an add-on attachment to
save your engine in the
event of a WI break down?
The Aquamist system is no way near perfect, not
even close. We are slowly
and steadily making our system better and
more durable and also at the same
time investing some of the incomes from the
sales on the diagnostics
capabilities. When we supply a Shurflo pump based
system to our customers,
it will be fully integrated system with all the
necessary part to ensure the
system will work reliability and effectively. It
will not be sold at
$299.99.
Regards
Richard from
Aquamist
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Labonte"
<
danlabonte@cox.net>
To: <
team3s@team3s.com>
Sent: Monday,
January 12, 2004 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Qs on water
injection
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From:
"Roger Gerl" <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
> To:
<
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Qs on water
injection
> Roger I will have to disagree with you on a few
points. The ERL system
pump
> is not designed for high HP
applications. With a 350hp car you will be
> running about
375-450ml/minute assuming a 50/50 mix of water methonal.
The
> ERL pump
drops off at 300ml/minute to 40psi injection pressure. With a
>
boost pressure of 18-20psi your WM effective injection pressure is only
>
20psi. The goal of WM is to get the most cooling with the least
quanity
> injected as the water displaces the oxygen of the air
charge. Thus you
want
> high pressure to atomise the WM as much
as possible. The injection nozzel
> is also an important factor in
the system. Both the ERL and
SnowPerformance
> (SP) kits use a
two chamber nozzel, but the SP nozzel has a venturie type
> orafise were
as the ERL is not. You will get better atomization with the
SP
>
nozzel.
>
> The SP pump is designed to maintain 140psi at a flow
rate of 1.5
> gallons/minute. There is also a larger pump that can
do 220psi at
> 2.2gal/min, but this usually used on large turbo deisel
engines. Don't
get
> me wrong, the ERL is a good system, but it
is designed for smaller engine
> (4cyl) applications.
>
> The
50/50 mix is a better choice then just straight water injection.
The
> methonal helps work as anti-detonation and adds to HP. You can
get about
> 40HP with the SP system running water and about 80HP running
WM, this has
> been dyno tested. So no reason to leave that extra
40HP on the table.
>
> > What you must think about is that
pre-pressurized tanks are not a great
> > option as they go out too
quickly and are for sure not the size you want
> to
> > find a
spot for in your engine bay.
>
> I agree not to use a
pre-pressurized tank, only leads to problems. Tank
> options for our
cars could include the following:
>
> 1) 1gallon Euro style washer
fluid tank that mounts under front clip. (I
> think Roger can sell
these)
>
> 2) 2qt radiator overflow tank from 99 model monunts under
clip ($35 is
what
> I paid for mine from one of the good guy
dealers)
>
> 3) Convert the stock washer fluid tank for WM injection
(but then no
window
> washing) Note: rear washer tank is to small for
any practical road racing
> use.
>
> 4) The SP kit comes with
a square 2qt tank with level sensor that could be
> monted in place of the
battery (would require you to relocate battery to
> use)
>
>
> The ERL System 1 comes with a boost sensor that electrically
switches
the
> > pump on at a specific boost level.
> So does
the SP stage one kit for about $120 less.
>
> > I do have the ERL
System 2 installed that comes with additional
controller
> > and
water valve that aloows to control the amount of water sprayed in
> >
relation to boost and rpm (3D mapping). Thsi is like a fuel or ignition
>
map
> > that is related to two other dimensions.
> The ERL system
is not true 3D mapping. It uses the injector dutycycle to
> control
pump speed (which is not a bad thing) and a boost switch to
controll
>
on/off. Yes it works with two different variables or inputs but is not
a
> true 3D map.
> The SP controller measures boost pressure and has
two user adjustable
> settings, Start and Full On. Start is the
boost pressure required to
> activate the system and Full On is the boost
pressre for max injection
qty.
> Start is adjustable from .5 to 8 psi
and Full On goes from 2 to 25psi.
The
> controller has its own PWM
contol for the pump and will vary the ramp rate
> of the injection qty
linearlly between the two settings. Also not a
lookup
> table or
3D mapping.
>
> > Adding alcohol may increase the octane rating
but you'll never know how
> much
> > octane you are really
running at the moment. ERL has now also a flow
meter
> > available
where you can see how much water is injected. With this the
>
exact
> > amount of water to fuel can be determined.
>
> No
big science here as the qty required is based on the HP of the car and
>
then correctly sizeing the nozzel for the application. See
>
http://www.snowperformance.net/installation.htm
for more details on this.
>
> The ERL 2s system sells for $750 at
3SX, SP stage 2 kit is only $399. The
> ERL is a good system, but is
it really worth $350 more?
>
> Dan Labonte
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:06:59
-0800
From: Gizmo <
kdmorg@comcast.net>
Subject: Team3S:
Re: power door switch
Erik is probably pointing you in the right
direction. The window
regulator has some plastic type parts/pulleys that
crack because of age
and the cable slips into these cracks and fouls things
up so your window
doesn't operate properly.
If you get another
regulator, don't buy one from a wrecking yard. Those
are just as old as
yours is and may well be ready to crack or break
also. A new one from
NORCO cost me $10 more that the wrecking yard
wanted for a used dirty
POS.
After replacing my driver side window regulator it worked
fine.
Regards,
Keith/Gizmo
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:13:46
-0500 (EST)
From: Michael Baldwin <
mbaldwin@alumni.tufts.edu>
Subject:
Team3S: Speedbleeders
A couple of questions for those of you with
speedbleeders:
1) Are they prone to leaking? I have heard they are, but
is this just a
matter of making sure they are tight enough?
2) Anyone
know quality differences between speedbleeder speedbleeders vs.
Russel
Speedbleeders?
3) Stainless steel - worth it (approximately $15 vs.
$7/bleeder) or not?
4) Necessary to bleed all 4 brakes at once? I have
directions on how to do
the front two, but I have heard the correct way is to
bleed rear
passenger, front driver, rear driver, front
passenger.
Thanks
Mike 97 vr4
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:55:31
-0600
From: "William J. Crabtree" <
wjcrabtree@earthlink.net>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: Speedbleeders
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com >
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf Of Michael Baldwin
> Sent:
Sunday, February 29, 2004 7:14 PM
> To:
Team3S@team3s.com> Subject: Team3S:
Speedbleeders
>
>
> A couple of questions for those of you
with speedbleeders:
>
> 1) Are they prone to leaking? I have heard
they are, but is
> this just a matter of making sure they are tight
enough?
I've had mine in for a while now(1 year plus on both my jeep
and
stealth)....haven't seen any leaks yet
>
> 3) Stainless
steel - worth it (approximately $15 vs.
> $7/bleeder) or
not?
Can't see the stainless ones being worth the extra cost. It's
not like
they're gonna rust.
>
> 4) Necessary to bleed all 4
brakes at once? I have directions
> on how to do the front two, but I
have heard the correct way
> is to bleed rear passenger, front driver,
rear driver, front
> passenger.
If you have ABS, you must bleed
all four lines to get all of the air and
old fluid out of the
system.
- -Jeff Crabtree
'91 Stealth R/T TT (3SI #0499)
2K Jeep TJ
Sport
St. Louis, MO
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 20:31:23
-0700
From: "Suzanne and da boys" <
mrjjsmkr@charter.net>
Subject:
Team3S: Suspension and Tranny Question.
First off we
own a 92 Dodge Stealth R/T NA with 90,000+ miles. With a
manual 5 Speed. When
we hit a hill with the cruise on or step on the gas in
5th it pops out of
gear.
Second we are going to replace the front struts and
rear shocks it has
the ECS does anybody know what would be the best ones for
keeping the car
flat on corners? KYB GR-2's, Stock..... And lowering it is
not an option.
Matt
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 07:19:34
-0700
From: "Bobby Vaughn" <
bobvaughn@bresnan.net>
Subject:
Team3S: Speedbleeders
I just had to do mine. I have speedbleeder
speedbleeders and they don't
leak fluid, but I do have to bleed the system
about once a year. It's not
bad though. It just gets a bit of air
into the lines. To me, they are
worth the hassle though. It's
rare that I could ever get someone over to my
house to help me bleed my
brakes, so I'll deal with an air issue just to be
able to bleed them
myself! I only know of one other person (personally)
that has them on
their car as well and they are beginning to notice the same
thing with
theirs. They've had theirs in for a little over a year now.
Hope this
helps.
Bobby
92 White VR4
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
End of Team3S: 3000GT &
Stealth V2
#383
***************************************