Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth Thursday, April 11
2002 Volume 01 : Number
808
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 2002 13:48:25 +0200
From: "Mikael Kenson" <
vr4@bahnhof.se>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re:
Alcohol and O2 sensor safety
- ----- Original Message -----
From:
"Roger Gerl" <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
>
> In my tests I saw 96°C (!!!) in the y-pipe at 1.0 bar boost with the
13g.
> This was reduced with 100% water to around 68°C. On another test
(1h
> later), I saw 90°C and with 50% methanol it was reduced to 75°C.
The
> sprayed amount was the same and did not vary like in their
test.
(I haven't had time to read the whole thread so please forgive me
if I'm slightly out of topic)
What Roger say was almost the same data as
I collected on my Celica GT4 (turbo,awd) with WI/AI.
However the
temperature of the intake air isn't most important with WI. It's the cooling of
the combustion chamber. Measuring the intake temp to deceide if water or alcohol
is the best to prevent knock is just the WRONG way to do it.
With my
front mount IC I have 24 deg C in the intake plenum when it's 21 deg C outside.
This is with 1,5 bar boost! Even though my temps are very low WI will help alot
in preventing knock.
/Mikael
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:38:43
+0200
From: Roger Gerl <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: Re: Alcohol and O2 sensor safety
>What Roger say was
almost the same data as I collected on my Celica GT4
>(turbo,awd) with
WI/AI.
>
>However the temperature of the intake air isn't most
important with WI.
>It's the cooling of the combustion chamber. Measuring
the intake temp to
>deceide if water or alcohol is the best to prevent
knock is just the WRONG
>way to do it.
Yes and no. It depends
where you spray. For this I do have two jets, one
for additional
intercooling and one for detonation control. I still don't
know why my temp
readings are that high. I saw up to 144°C in the rear ic
piping at 1.1 bars
!
>With my front mount IC I have 24 deg C in the intake plenum when
it's 21
>deg C outside. This is with 1,5 bar boost! Even though my temps
are very
>low WI will help alot in preventing knock.
1.5 bar with
the GT FOUR ?? Have you monitored knock on this car then ? I
have just
installed two WIS in GT FOURS and they are not running more than
1.2 bars
right now (but they are running like hell). On one we mounted the
jet before
the water/air intercooler for better cooling and on one after
the core
(maybe too close to the TB).
Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:59:29
+0200
From: "Mikael Kenson" <
vr4@bahnhof.se>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re:
Alcohol and O2 sensor safety
- ----- Original Message -----
From:
"Roger Gerl" <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
>
Yes and no. It depends where you spray. For this I do have two jets, one
> for additional intercooling and one for detonation control.
IMHO The intake temp shall be cured with a good intercooler arrangement.
> 1.5 bar with the GT FOUR ??
NO NO Sorry, the intake temp in
the last example (24 deg C) is from my 3000gt not the GT4
>Have you
monitored knock on this car then ?
I did monitor knock on the GT four
and it was horrible before WI. With WI I ran 1.3 bar without
detonation.
Now I run up to 1,5 without waterinjection or race fuel in
the VR4 (gulp!)
/Mikael
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 07:57:04
-0700 (PDT)
From: menalteed <
menalteed@yahoo.com>
Subject:
Team3S: Lighting in interior well area
I have wanted to add some soft red
lighting into the
leg well area for road trips, I see we have a light
in
that area already that comes on when I open the door.
What I would like
to do is have the small leg well
lights work with the dash reostat and not
with the
door open lights. I wonder if this would be easy to
do, just
moving a wire over or something, has this
been done by anyone and if so was
it just a simple
thing. I don't have a Stealth electrical book right
now,
but hope to have one soon.
Peter 92 Stealth
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:45:18
-0500
From: "Geisel, Brian" <
Brian.Geisel@COMPAQ.com>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: Lighting in interior well area
Yeah, it shouldn't be too bad
actually. If you pull off the dash cover from under the steering wheel,
you can get at plenty of taps for the interior lighting at that point. It
should be pretty easy to run wire to where you want to mount that light
also. One of the few places in our cars where there happens to be some
room ;)
geis
- -----Original Message-----
From: menalteed
[mailto:menalteed@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:57 AM
To:
tam 3S
Subject: Team3S: Lighting in interior well area
I have
wanted to add some soft red lighting into the
leg well area for road trips, I
see we have a light in
that area already that comes on when I open the
door.
What I would like to do is have the small leg well
lights work with
the dash reostat and not with the
door open lights. I wonder if this would be
easy to
do, just moving a wire over or something, has this
been done by
anyone and if so was it just a simple
thing. I don't have a Stealth
electrical book right
now, but hope to have one soon.
Peter 92
Stealth
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:47:32
EDT
From:
DonBrando36@aol.comSubject: Team3S:
dynamic turbo
hey guys, i was looking through
dynamicturbo.com and i found a N/A mod
link. I am going to buy the DN
performance intake, unorthodox underdrive
pulley and the gate belt.
Does dynamic have a good reputation on shipping
and pricing. I jsut
dont want to get screwed like i've been. I ordered my
borla cat-back
from stillen 3 months ago and i still havent recieved it, they
told me the
new date is april 22.
thanks alot
brandon
93 3000GT n/a
long island
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:31:36
-0400
From: "Tom Terflinger" <
terflit@hotmail.com>
Subject:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
I went to the track over the weekend and ran a 13.757
@105mph w/ a 2.33 60'
time! I am not sure how to launch, I just read Bob
Fontana's launch FAQ and
I will try that next time. Anyhow I am pretty sure
my VPC and GCC have me
running way too rich but I am told better safe than
sorry dont go lean. At
the track I had 94 octane gas and ocatne boost up to
aroung 100 octane. Dose
that make the car run even richer? Also is it true
rich = more power less
gas mileage, is there a break point where too rich
=less power less gas
mileage? Anyhow I made 2 more passes both 13.8's @102
and 103mph. Any advice
is appreciated, I hope to have access by this weekend
to a pocketlogger and
am getting an air fuel gauge installed as
well.
92 VR4
Stock 9b turbos
Stillen DP
HKS Super Dragger
cat-back
HKS Duel Mushroom Filters
Greddy BOV
HKS VPC & GCC
HKS
EVC 4 (set @ 1 bar) I notice it only holds .75 bar unless the car isnt
working hard, like 5th gear @75 and floor it holds 1 bar easy.
18" tires
(do these help or hurt at the track?) should I have higher or
lower psi at
the track?
Alamo Y pipe
Thanks for any tips!
Tom
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:43:04
-0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <
dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Tom ... how did you get to 100 octane? You
didn't put in Octane Booster
did you? Remember that this changes by
points of octane which is then
divided by 100 so when it says it increases 5
points I think that is
actually 5 tenths of a point or something so instead
of 94 you have 94.5
octane. I think this went around a while
back. Not sure. I am lucky
enough to have 94 octane here and 100
octane at the track available. It
was hard driving through the Midwest
when the highest they had was 91.
- --Flash!
1995 VR-4
Pittsburgh,
PA
www.schilberg.com-
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Terflinger
Sent: Wednesday, April 10,
2002 14:32
I went to the track over the weekend and ran a 13.757
@105mph w/ a 2.33
60'
time! I am not sure how to launch, I just read Bob
Fontana's launch FAQ
and
I will try that next time. Anyhow I am pretty
sure my VPC and GCC have
me
running way too rich but I am told better
safe than sorry dont go lean.
At
the track I had 94 octane gas and ocatne
boost up to aroung 100 octane.
Dose
that make the car run even richer?
Also is it true rich = more power
less
gas mileage, is there a break
point where too rich =less power less gas
mileage? Anyhow I made 2 more
passes both 13.8's @102 and 103mph. Any
advice
is appreciated, I hope to
have access by this weekend to a pocketlogger
and
am getting an air fuel
gauge installed as well.
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:08:32
-0500
From: "Geisel, Brian" <
Brian.Geisel@COMPAQ.com>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Tom,
Here's a couple of things. No
offense, but 2.33 60' it terrible! You can do way better bud. I
pulled a 1.895 60' with a stock car (+K&N), by side-stepping the clutch at 7
grand or so (might have even been higher - rev limiter).
Soooo, if you
bring that down to 1.9, that's .4 off your 1/4 mi right there... usually the
rule of thumb is a .1 at the front is worth .2 on the back, so that's more like
.8. You should have no problem running 12's. My best time so far is
13.387 w/ 1.952 60'. I'm still running stock boost pressure (11.5 on '94
VR-4).
For tire pressure - you can lower it if you are getting too much
wheel spin, but I'm guessing you're not. Higher pressure = better speed
(i.e. higher trap speed), lower pressure = better launch (if and only if you're
getting wheel spin). Stock pressure (32/30) should be fine for you
though.
I'm off to the track tonight, I'll let you know how it turns
out. Just keep working on that launch until you can get down to like 1.7
or 1.8 60' times. Good luck man!
geis
- -----Original
Message-----
From: Tom Terflinger [mailto:terflit@hotmail.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:32 PM
To:
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
I went to the track over the weekend and ran a 13.757
@105mph w/ a 2.33 60'
time! I am not sure how to launch, I just read Bob
Fontana's launch FAQ and
I will try that next time. Anyhow I am pretty sure
my VPC and GCC have me
running way too rich but I am told better safe than
sorry dont go lean. At
the track I had 94 octane gas and ocatne boost up to
aroung 100 octane. Dose
that make the car run even richer? Also is it true
rich = more power less
gas mileage, is there a break point where too rich
=less power less gas
mileage? Anyhow I made 2 more passes both 13.8's @102
and 103mph. Any advice
is appreciated, I hope to have access by this weekend
to a pocketlogger and
am getting an air fuel gauge installed as
well.
92 VR4
Stock 9b turbos
Stillen DP
HKS Super Dragger
cat-back
HKS Duel Mushroom Filters
Greddy BOV
HKS VPC & GCC
HKS
EVC 4 (set @ 1 bar) I notice it only holds .75 bar unless the car isnt
working hard, like 5th gear @75 and floor it holds 1 bar easy.
18" tires
(do these help or hurt at the track?) should I have higher or
lower psi at
the track?
Alamo Y pipe
Thanks for any tips!
Tom
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:36:42
-0400
From: "Tom Terflinger" <
terflit@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fwd:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Correction, I meant to say I had 94 octane w/
octane boost so not actually
100 octane maybe 94.5-96. Dose this make the
car run even richer, ie I
should lean out the mixture w/ the vpc and gcc. I
havent got the air fuel
gauge installed yet so its a guessing
game.
>From: "Geisel, Brian" <
Brian.Geisel@COMPAQ.com>
>To:
"Tom Terflinger" <
terflit@hotmail.com>, <
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
>Subject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
>Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:08:32
-0500
>
>Tom,
> Here's a couple of things. No offense,
but 2.33 60' it terrible! You can
>do way better bud. I
pulled a 1.895 60' with a stock car (+K&N), by
>side-stepping the
clutch at 7 grand or so (might have even been higher -
>rev
limiter).
>
> Soooo, if you bring that down to 1.9, that's .4 off
your 1/4 mi right
>there... usually the rule of thumb is a .1 at the
front is worth .2 on the
>back, so that's more like .8. You should
have no problem running 12's. My
>best time so far is 13.387 w/
1.952 60'. I'm still running stock boost
>pressure (11.5 on '94
VR-4).
>
> For tire pressure - you can lower it if you are getting
too much wheel
>spin, but I'm guessing you're not. Higher pressure
= better speed (i.e.
>higher trap speed), lower pressure = better launch
(if and only if you're
>getting wheel spin). Stock pressure (32/30)
should be fine for you though.
>
> I'm off to the track tonight,
I'll let you know how it turns out. Just
>keep working on that
launch until you can get down to like 1.7 or 1.8 60'
>times. Good
luck man!
>
>geis
>
>-----Original
Message-----
>From: Tom Terflinger
[mailto:terflit@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 2:32
PM
>To:
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>Subject:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
>
>I went to the track over the weekend and ran
a 13.757 @105mph w/ a 2.33 60'
>time! I am not sure how to launch, I just
read Bob Fontana's launch FAQ and
>I will try that next time. Anyhow I am
pretty sure my VPC and GCC have me
>running way too rich but I am told
better safe than sorry dont go lean. At
>the track I had 94 octane gas and
ocatne boost up to aroung 100 octane.
>Dose
>that make the car run
even richer? Also is it true rich = more power less
>gas mileage, is there
a break point where too rich =less power less gas
>mileage? Anyhow I made
2 more passes both 13.8's @102 and 103mph. Any
>advice
>is
appreciated, I hope to have access by this weekend to a pocketlogger
and
>am getting an air fuel gauge installed as well.
>
>92
VR4
>Stock 9b turbos
>Stillen DP
>HKS Super Dragger
cat-back
>HKS Duel Mushroom Filters
>Greddy BOV
>HKS VPC &
GCC
>HKS EVC 4 (set @ 1 bar) I notice it only holds .75 bar unless the car
isnt
>working hard, like 5th gear @75 and floor it holds 1 bar
easy.
>18" tires (do these help or hurt at the track?) should I have
higher or
>lower psi at the track?
>Alamo Y
pipe
>
>Thanks for any tips!
>Tom
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:51:27
-0500
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <
dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Darren,
I live outside of Chicago and have
never heard of any place around here
having anything other than 87, 89, and
(92, 93, or 94 depending on where you
go). AFAIK we have premium
available most everywhere. What parts of the
midwest are you referring
to?
Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net-
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Schilberg
[mailto:dschilberg@pobox.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:43 PM
To:
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Tom ... how did you get to 100 octane? You
didn't put in Octane Booster
did you? Remember that this changes by
points of octane which is then
divided by 100 so when it says it increases 5
points I think that is
actually 5 tenths of a point or something so instead
of 94 you have 94.5
octane. I think this went around a while
back. Not sure. I am lucky
enough to have 94 octane here and 100
octane at the track available. It
was hard driving through the Midwest
when the highest they had was 91.
- --Flash!
1995 VR-4
Pittsburgh,
PA
www.schilberg.com-
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Terflinger
Sent: Wednesday, April 10,
2002 14:32
I went to the track over the weekend and ran a 13.757
@105mph w/ a 2.33
60'
time! I am not sure how to launch, I just read Bob
Fontana's launch FAQ
and
I will try that next time. Anyhow I am pretty
sure my VPC and GCC have
me
running way too rich but I am told better
safe than sorry dont go lean.
At
the track I had 94 octane gas and ocatne
boost up to aroung 100 octane.
Dose
that make the car run even richer?
Also is it true rich = more power
less
gas mileage, is there a break
point where too rich =less power less gas
mileage? Anyhow I made 2 more
passes both 13.8's @102 and 103mph. Any
advice
is appreciated, I hope to
have access by this weekend to a pocketlogger
and
am getting an air fuel
gauge installed as well.
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:00:10
-0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <
dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Dave,
Oklahoma, Topeka, KS (Heartland Park)
and on the way through Indiana and
to Kansas. 500 miles got me away
from Pittsburgh but into Kansas they
have nothing higher than 91 that I could
easily find. That was a year
ago. Maybe something
changed.
- --Flash!
- -----Original Message-----
From: Black,
Dave (ICT) [mailto:dblai@allstate.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002
15:51
To:
'dschilberg@pobox.com';
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Darren,
I live outside of Chicago and have
never heard of any place around here
having anything other than 87, 89, and
(92, 93, or 94 depending on where
you
go). AFAIK we have premium
available most everywhere. What parts of
the
midwest are you
referring to?
Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:03:03
-0600
From: "Floyd, Jim" <
Jim_Floyd@maxtor.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
91 in Colorado : (
- -----Original
Message-----
From: Darren Schilberg [mailto:dschilberg@pobox.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:00 PM
To:
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
Dave,
Oklahoma, Topeka, KS (Heartland
Park) and on the way through Indiana and
to Kansas. 500 miles got me
away from Pittsburgh but into Kansas they
have nothing higher than 91 that I
could easily find. That was a year
ago. Maybe something
changed.
- --Flash!
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:15:52
-0400
From: "Jerry B." <
scorpman@optonline.net>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
I have found a place here in NJ that sells 100..
I run that in mine all the
time. But very expensive. I pay 4.50 a gallon.
Costs mw about 68 dollars to
fill up every time. But if anybody here in the
NJ area is lookingfor it let
me know and I will give you information where yo
ucan find it. Thanks
Jerry 92 stealth e/s and 93 stealth rt/tt
-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Floyd, Jim" <
Jim_Floyd@maxtor.com>
To: <
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:03 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile
ET
>
> 91 in Colorado : (
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:04:35
-0700
From: "Bob Forrest" <
bf@bobforrest.com>
Subject: Re:
Team3S: dynamic turbo
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <
DonBrando36@aol.com>
>
hey guys, i was looking through dynamicturbo.com and i found a N/A
mod
link. I am going to buy the DN performance intake, unorthodox
underdrive
pulley and the gate belt. Does dynamic have a good
reputation on shipping
and pricing. I jsut dont want to get screwed
like i've been. I ordered my
borla cat-back from stillen 3 months ago
and i still havent recieved it,
they told me the new date is april
22.
> thanks alot
>
brandon
> 93 3000GT n/a
> long island
-
------------------------------------->
The Unorthodox (and any other
'unbalanced') pulley is NOT recommended for
our cars. The only
recommended pulley is made by Buscher Racing. Go to our
website and
read the FAQ page that tells you all about it. It's an article
put
together by Cody Graham, and includes comments from a number of
other
members; there's even one from Dynamic Racing (Matt's a Team3S member,
too)
in defense of the Unothodox UDP. The facts (and certainly the
theory)
appear to 'disagree' with their recommendations in this case.
Caveat
Emptor...
www.Team3S.com/FAQudp.htmBest,
Forrest
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:00:34
-0400
From: "Zobel, Kurt" <
KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: dynamic turbo
Can't comment on them, but site looks
interesting.
I'll bite, what is the 'gate belt' ?
Kurt
-
-----Original Message-----
From:
DonBrando36@aol.com
[mailto:DonBrando36@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:48 AM
To:
team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
Team3S: dynamic turbo
hey guys, i was looking through
dynamicturbo.com and i found a N/A mod
link. I am going to buy the DN
performance intake, unorthodox underdrive
pulley and the gate belt.
Does dynamic have a good reputation on shipping
and pricing. I jsut
dont want to get screwed like i've been. I ordered my
borla cat-back
from stillen 3 months ago and i still havent recieved it, they
told me the
new date is april 22.
thanks alot
brandon
93 3000GT n/a
long island
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:51:25
-0500
From: "xwing" <
xwing@wi.rr.com>
Subject: Team3S: Re:
Octane Booster Real Effect
I had heard the "5 points means 0.5 octane
raise" before, so I sent letter
to 104+ Octane Booster's company. Here
is my letter and their reply (oh oh,
I didn't get permission from them to
reprint this!)
-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear
Jack:
Thank you for your inquiry. Our Super 104+ Octane booster boosts
octane
effect 5 to 7 (whole) points, not tenths of a point (.5-.7) as you
have
heard.
Sincerely,
Gold Eagle
From: xwing
[mailto:xwing@wi.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001
To:
marketing@goldeagle.comSubject:
104+ octane boost Question
I have a question: I've used 104+ octane boost for
years, thinking it raised
the octane of 93 octane pump gas to about 98-100
octane.
I have now heard from some people that when 104+ Brand advertises
that it
increases the octane by "5 to 7 points" it does NOT mean from 93 to
98-100
octane, but REALLY MEANS from 93.0 to 93.5-93.7 octane.
In other
words, it increases it by 0.5-0.7 octane, not by 5.0-7.0 octane.
WHAT is the
TRUTH? I am writing you so I have the truth in writing from
your
company.
Thanks!
Jack Tertadian M.D.
Auto Enthusiast
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
------------
From: "Darren Schilberg" <
dschilberg@pobox.com>
> Tom ...
how did you get to 100 octane? You didn't put in Octane Booster
>
did you? Remember that this changes by points of octane which is
then
> divided by 100 so when it says it increases 5 points I think that
is
> actually 5 tenths of a point or something so instead of 94 you have
94.5
> octane. I think this went around a while back. Not
sure.
> --Flash!
> From: Tom Terflinger
> running way too
rich but I am told better safe than sorry dont go lean.
> At the
track I had 94 octane gas and ocatne boost up to aroung
100
octane.
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:49:55
-0700
From: "ek2mfg" <
ek2mfg@foxinternet.com>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: dynamic turbo
If I may add to this......
I bought a DN
intake tube for my NA and the quality of the welds is
very poor...I actually
have a hole in the pipe but is covered by the
hose clamp....not the air inlet
hole either...a burn through from a
welder....I was told it wasn't a big deal
and DN left it at
that....for 150.00 I would toss in the money from the pipe
and get a
buschur UD pully.....it has a balancer and not an aluminum
pully
only...the gains should be exactly the same but the stress on
the
motor will be much less with the balanced pully....or
harmonic
balanced pully as it were....MR. 316 has a very long explanation
of
this and I believe his words.....its 350 for it though not 200 but
the
intake tube is nothing more than a 150 chromie to sit under the
hood......not
a mod that will add performance in any sense...those
who dream will claim 5hp
but I for can tell no difference...only in
sound with my K&N and tube
together. Bottom line...your money...your
car.
The gates belt is a
brand name.....nothing more. Much like gator back
belts from good
year.
bobk.
93 r/t 99 conversion
paint job to be completed by
4/22
see ya'll this summer on the roads :)
- ---- Original Message
----
From:
KURT.ZOBEL@ca.comTo:
DonBrando36@aol.com,
team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: dynamic turbo
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:00:34
-0400
>Can't comment on them, but site looks
interesting.
>
>I'll bite, what is the 'gate belt'
?
>
>Kurt
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
DonBrando36@aol.com
[mailto:DonBrando36@aol.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:48
AM
>To:
team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>Subject:
Team3S: dynamic turbo
>
>
> hey guys, i was
looking through dynamicturbo.com and i found a
>N/A mod
>link. I am going to buy the DN performance intake, unorthodox
>underdrive
>pulley and the gate belt. Does dynamic have a
good reputation on
>shipping
>and pricing. I jsut dont want
to get screwed like i've been. I
>ordered my
>borla cat-back
from stillen 3 months ago and i still havent recieved
>it, they
>told me the new date is april 22.
> thanks
alot
>
>brandon
>93 3000GT n/a
>long
island
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:53:00
-0500
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <
dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
I meant to say that I haven't heard of premium being
unavailable from
"within the Midwest". I guess my "Midwest" region is
WI, IN, IL, MI, etc.
Forgot about heading down by OK, KS,
etc.
Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net-
-----Original Message-----
From: Floyd, Jim
[mailto:Jim_Floyd@maxtor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:03 PM
To:
Team3S@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: 1/4 Mile ET
91 in Colorado : (
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:19:23
-0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <
gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: dynamic turbo
> The Unorthodox (and any other
'unbalanced') pulley is NOT recommended for
- ---
You mean
undampened..didnt cha?
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:35:54
-0500
From: "Trevor James" <
trevor@kscable.com>
Subject: Re:
Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
That's nuts...the stuff that it's
made out of (Xylene and Toluene) are only
117 & 114 octane
respectively.
http://www.vtr.org/maintain/gasoline-octane.htmlThere's
no way that little bottle is going to raise octane by 5-7
whole
number...unless you added a whole 16 oz. bottle per 1/2 gallon of 92
octane
in your tank.
Trevor
- ----- Original Message
-----
From: "xwing" <
xwing@wi.rr.com>
To: <
team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:51 PM
Subject: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real
Effect
> I had heard the "5 points means 0.5 octane raise" before, so
I sent letter
> to 104+ Octane Booster's company. Here is my letter
and their reply (oh
oh,
> I didn't get permission from them to reprint
this!)
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Dear Jack:
> Thank you for your inquiry. Our Super 104+ Octane booster
boosts octane
> effect 5 to 7 (whole) points, not tenths of a point
(.5-.7) as you have
> heard.
> Sincerely,
> Gold
Eagle
>
> From: xwing [mailto:xwing@wi.rr.com]
> Sent:
Thursday, November 29, 2001
> To:
marketing@goldeagle.com>
Subject: 104+ octane boost Question
> I have a question: I've used 104+
octane boost for years, thinking it
raised
> the octane of 93 octane
pump gas to about 98-100 octane.
> I have now heard from some people that
when 104+ Brand advertises that it
> increases the octane by "5 to 7
points" it does NOT mean from 93 to 98-100
> octane, but REALLY MEANS from
93.0 to 93.5-93.7 octane.
> In other words, it increases it by 0.5-0.7
octane, not by 5.0-7.0 octane.
> WHAT is the TRUTH? I am writing you
so I have the truth in writing from
> your company.
>
Thanks!
> Jack Tertadian M.D.
> Auto Enthusiast
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:41:31
-0500
From: "Jeff" <
spydervr4@attbi.com>
Subject: Re:
Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
Actually I've had really good luck
with VP brand octane boost. In my
Eclipse I was only able to run 15psi
with no knock and when I added a bottle
of VP to about 3/4 tank, I could run
19psi. It was a HUGE difference. Of
course it's $10 per bottle
and it's the only one I found that said it could
damage oxygen sensors and
catalytic converters.
jeff
'95 Mitsubishi Spyder VR-4
'01 Chevrolet
Silverado HD Duramax
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor
James" <
trevor@kscable.com>
To:
<
team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent:
Wednesday, April 10, 2002 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster
Real Effect
> That's nuts...the stuff that it's made out of (Xylene
and Toluene) are
only
> 117 & 114 octane respectively.
>
http://www.vtr.org/maintain/gasoline-octane.html>
There's no way that little bottle is going to raise octane by 5-7 whole
>
number...unless you added a whole 16 oz. bottle per 1/2 gallon of
92
octane
> in your tank.
>
> Trevor
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:48:16
-0700
From: Damon Rachell <
damonr@mefas.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S:
Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
that's totally right. I just did the
calculations and if you used 1
gallon (about 8 times more than what one of
those bottles consists of)
then the relative octane of the booster (mixed
with 15 gallons of 91)
has to be:
200 octane would give a tank full
of 97.8
170 octane would give a tank full of 95.9 octane.
That would
mean that the booster itself, in it's pint size, would be 4
times that
octane!!!
Even if it's tetraethyl lead (former octane booster before
unleaded) in
pure form, it would not be able to get the octane that
high.
This is total BS and I would not believe it for a
minute.
Damon
Trevor James wrote:
> That's nuts...the stuff
that it's made out of (Xylene and Toluene) are only
> 117 & 114 octane
respectively.
>
http://www.vtr.org/maintain/gasoline-octane.html>
There's no way that little bottle is going to raise octane by 5-7 whole
>
number...unless you added a whole 16 oz. bottle per 1/2 gallon of 92
octane
> in your tank.
>
> Trevor
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:51:03
-0700
From: Damon Rachell <
damonr@mefas.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S:
Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
BTW, I've made up an excel spreadsheet
with relative octane numbers per
tankful. If anyone wants it, e-mail
me at
damonr@mefas.com and I'll
send
it off list.
It's kinda cool to see how much difference 103 vs 100
makes. Great for
making out cost
comparisons.
Damon
Trevor James wrote:
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:31:08
+0200
From: "Roger Gerl" <
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: Under drive pulley
Yes, for sure he meant that
.)
Regarding the UDPs, it's true that it "may" cause bad things. But
the
reality shows that no car that is using it ever had or runned into
problems
due to the pulley. I myself are runnign and UDP now due to the only
positive
experiences. Althoug the theroy says no and I said "to never isntall
one" I
did install it and there are indeed no side
effects.
Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:08:14
-0700
From: "dakken" <
dougusmagnus@attbi.com>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
I find this discussion
interesting. I have found a good web site that
explains octane rating
in easy to understand terms.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question90.htmCould
it be that the octane boosters work the same way that tetraethyl lead
worked
before it was banned?
Doug
92 Stealth RT TT
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:11:20
-0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <
gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: Under drive pulley
Granted its just theory, but theres solid
engineering principles
underneath it.
Toyota's seem to find off #1
main bearing wear with a cheap UDP, and im
sure its the longer I6 that helps
make it more visible there.
But in that a proper alternative IS
available, I see no need to push the
Unorthadox part.
On Thu, 11 Apr
2002, Roger Gerl wrote:
> Yes, for sure he meant that .)
>
> Regarding the UDPs, it's true that it "may" cause bad things. But
the
> reality shows that no car that is using it ever had or runned into
problems
> due to the pulley. I myself are runnign and UDP now due to the
only positive
> experiences. Althoug the theroy says no and I said "to
never isntall one" I
> did install it and there are indeed no side
effects.
>
> Roger
> 93'3000GT TT
>
www.rtec.ch*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:11:23
-0700
From: "fastmax" <
fastmax@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S:
Under drive pulley
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Gerl"
<
roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
>
Yes, for sure he meant that .)
>
> Regarding the UDPs, it's true
that it "may" cause bad things. But the
> reality shows that no car that
is using it ever had or runned into problems
> due to the pulley. I myself
are runnign and UDP now due to the only positive
> experiences. Althoug
the theroy says no and I said "to never isntall one" I
> did install it
and there are indeed no side effects.
>
> Roger
> 93'3000GT
TT
=======================================================
You forgot
to add one important word to your paragraph on the underdrive
pulley.
The last sentence should read:
"Although the theory
says no and I said "to never isntall one" I
did install it and there
are indeed no side effects ---
yet."
Jim
Berry
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:49:48
-0500
From: "cody" <
overclck@satx.rr.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
"Eighty-seven-octane gasoline is
gasoline that contains 87-percent
octane and 13-percent heptane (or some
other combination of fuels that
has the same performance of the 87/13
combination of octane/heptane)."
Quoted from that page above... I
have one question... How is this
possible, or are they in err. Cause,
if you have over 100 octane, it
would mean it has more than 100% of octane in
the fuel... That's just
not possible, as we all know...
-
-Cody
- -----Original Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of dakken
Sent: Wednesday,
April 10, 2002 6:08 PM
Cc:
team3s@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
Re: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
I find this discussion
interesting. I have found a good web site that
explains octane rating
in easy to understand terms.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question90.htmCould
it be that the octane boosters work the same way that
tetraethyl
lead
worked before it was banned?
Doug
92 Stealth RT
TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:14:52
-0400
From: "Chris" <
cm1994@qx.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Re:
Octane Booster Real Effect
They are in err...Octane is not an ingredient
in gasoline. It is a rating
of the fuels resistance to knock in a
controlled lab engine.
Chris
93 Stealth R/T TT
- -----Original
Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of cody
Sent: Wednesday, April
10, 2002 7:50 PM
To: 'dakken'
Cc:
team3s@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
"Eighty-seven-octane gasoline
is gasoline that contains 87-percent
octane and 13-percent heptane (or some
other combination of fuels that
has the same performance of the 87/13
combination of octane/heptane)."
Quoted from that page above... I
have one question... How is this
possible, or are they in err. Cause,
if you have over 100 octane, it
would mean it has more than 100% of octane in
the fuel... That's just
not possible, as we all know...
-
-Cody
- -----Original Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of dakken
Sent: Wednesday,
April 10, 2002 6:08 PM
Cc:
team3s@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
Re: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
I find this discussion
interesting. I have found a good web site that
explains octane rating
in easy to understand terms.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question90.htmCould
it be that the octane boosters work the same way that
tetraethyl
lead
worked before it was banned?
Doug
92 Stealth RT
TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:43:26
-0500
From: Matt Jannusch <
mjannusch@attbi.com>
Subject: Re:
Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
Chris wrote:
>They are
in err...Octane is not an ingredient in gasoline. It is a rating
>of
the fuels resistance to knock in a controlled lab engine.
>
Octane is
an ingredient in common gasoline. The octane rating indicates
what
percentage of the mix is iso-octane (or more specifically,
"2,2,4-trimethylpentane").
The reason you can get octane numbers
higher than 100 (representing 100%
iso-octane) is because you can use other
compounds in the fuel that are
more knock-resistant than iso-octane (like
toluene (114 octane), xylene
(117 octane), MTBE (118 octane),
etc).
What's the "controlled lab engine"? In order to determine
knock
resistance the compression ratio would need to be adjustable, so I'd
think using a particular engine as a standard would defeat the purpose
of the test.
If I'm wrong, clue me in here...
- -Matt
'95
3000GT Spyder VR4
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 19:10:18
-0700
From: Damon Rachell <
damonr@mefas.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S:
Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
I thought MTBE was an oxider? Hence
the term oxygenated gas? I'm just
reading off of the california
pumps.
To truly test whether these octane additives do what they say,
someone
with a data logger should up boost until their car begins to
detonate.
Then add the octane additive, and see how much boost you can
increase
until detonation. I'd say that if cylender pressures are
significatly
higher (several psi boost higher) then the additives have to
significantly increase octane rating.
Damon
Matt Jannusch
wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>
>> They are in err...Octane is
not an ingredient in gasoline. It is a
>> rating
>> of
the fuels resistance to knock in a controlled lab engine.
>>
>
Octane is an ingredient in common gasoline. The octane rating indicates
> what percentage of the mix is iso-octane (or more specifically,
> "2,2,4-trimethylpentane").
>
> The reason you can get
octane numbers higher than 100 (representing 100%
> iso-octane) is
because you can use other compounds in the fuel that are
> more
knock-resistant than iso-octane (like toluene (114 octane), xylene
> (117
octane), MTBE (118 octane), etc).
>
> What's the "controlled lab
engine"? In order to determine knock
> resistance the compression
ratio would need to be adjustable, so I'd
> think using a particular
engine as a standard would defeat the purpose
> of the test.
>
> If I'm wrong, clue me in here...
>
> -Matt
> '95
3000GT Spyder VR4
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:38:41
-0400
From: "Chris" <
cm1994@qx.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Re:
Octane Booster Real Effect
Matt wrote:
>What's the "controlled
lab engine"? In order to determine knock
>resistance the compression
ratio would need to be adjustable, so I'd
>think using a particular engine
as a standard would defeat the purpose
>of the test.
>If I'm
wrong, clue me in here...
>-Matt
>'95 3000GT Spyder
VR4
Copied from
http://www.grapeaperacing.com/GrapeApeRacing/tech/fueloctane.cfmThe
motor octane rating, referred to as MON (motor octane number), is the
best
rating to use when selecting fuel for your race or high compression
engine.
When testing MON, the fuel is heated to 300? F and the intake air is
heated
to 100? F. The test engine is a single cylinder 4 cycle engine that
is run at
900 rpm. Ignition timing is varied with compression ratio. Engine
load is
varied during test.
Research Octane Rating
Known as RON (research
octane rating). Tested at 600 rpm with a fixed timing
of 13? BTDC. The fuel
temp is not controlled at all and the intake air temp
is varied with
barometric pressure. This is done to covert everything to a
SAE standard day,
which is 60? F, 0% Humidity, and 29.92 inches barometric
pressure. The RON
should not be used when selecting fuel for a race or high
performance engine.
The RON will always be higher than the MON.
Chris
93 Stealth R/T
TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:24:19
EDT
From:
ThorHolth@aol.comSubject: Team3S: ECU
repair
Sometime ago, I mentioned that I was having problems with the
number three
and six cylinders not firing on my 1991 stealth r/t turbo. (got
a code 53
from the MPI connector) After swapping around the coils, i
found that they
were not the problem, so I swapped out the ignition chip
right next to the
coils (thank you Norco for not taking all of my money,
like the local dodge
dealer), yet the code 53 persists after a brief absence
for about a week. It
used to come and go, but now its misfiring all of
the time. I guess I'm in
for a ECU replacement or rebuild, because the
harness checks out.
I already did the capacitor repair a few months ago,
suspecting that that
that might be the problem too, but nothing has
worked.
Here's the question:
I looked online and found Full
Logic and ECM World (in CA and TX), but a
search of the message boards
on Team 3s doesn't turn up any solid
recommendations. I want the thing
repaired correctly, but don't want to pay
an arm and a leg if it's just
another capacitor.
Also, can any of the repair
facilities test the ECU to make sure it'll be
okay.
finally, what about a facility that offers an
exchange?
_any help would be appreciated.
-
-Thor
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 20:25:04
-0700
From: "fastmax" <
fastmax@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S:
Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
They use a single cylinder, variable
compression test engine to determin when
knock occures --- the pump number
is research method + motor method divided
by
2.
Jim
Berry
============================================
- ----- Original
Message -----
From: "Matt Jannusch" <
mjannusch@attbi.com>
>
> What's the "controlled lab engine"? In order to determine knock
> resistance the compression ratio would need to be adjustable, so I'd
> think using a particular engine as a standard would defeat the purpose
> of the test.
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:41:01
-0500
From: David Allison <
daedel@mac.com>
Subject: Team3S: Test
Pipe Sizing Chart
I know there was a question about exhaust size when
buying the test pipe
for our cars and I found this chart on the
grapeaperacing.com web site
that Chris just linked to. The NAs only need 2
1/4 " piping according to
the table as they fall into the smallest range. I
believe that's the
kind of engine the question was for.
Horsepower
Range Single Exhaust Diameter Dual Exhaust Diameter
200-300
3" 2 1/4"
300-400
3 1/2" 2 1/2"
375-450
4" 3"
450-550
4 1/2" 3 1/2"
550-650
5" 3 1/2"
650-800
- 4"
800-1000
- 4 1/2"
1000 +
- 5"
- -David
94 3000GT NA - and proud of it ;)
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:54:32
-0400
From: "Bill vp" <
billvp@highstream.net>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
what is the (R+M)/2 that it
always says on the pump is the way the octane is
rated?
-
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of Chris
Sent: Wednesday, April
10, 2002 9:15 PM
To: cody; 'dakken'
Cc:
team3s@stealth-3000gt.stSubject:
RE: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
They are in err...Octane is
not an ingredient in gasoline. It is a rating
of the fuels resistance
to knock in a controlled lab engine.
Chris
93 Stealth R/T
TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:10:33
-0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Rayman <
theturbodog@yahoo.com>
Subject:
RE: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
Uh, you kinda took that out of
context a little I think. I think
what they were saying esentially is
that octane has a rating of 100
and heptane has a rating of zero. If
you mix 87% iso-octane and 13%
heptane you end up with a reference fuel
having a rating of exactly
87 octane. If a variable compression engine
is set exactly where the
87 octane reference fuel detonates and then the fuel
is changed to
some other fuel you want to rate. If the fuel does not
detonate then
it is of higher octane rating than the 87 octane reference
fuel, if
it does then it is of a lower octane rating. The proportions
of
octane and heptane could be changed around until you found a
reference
fuel that closely approximated your experiment fuel and
then you would know
the octane rating of your fuel.
Octane ratings are not linear
functions. Mixing 100 octane and 90
octane fuel in equal porportions
does not equal 95 octane because
probably 95% of what is in the tank is
gasoline while the other 5%
are the additions that alter the properties of
the fuel. I don't
know off the top of my head what the octane rating of
lead was, but
only a very very small amount was needed to raise the octane
rating
several points.
I have "proven" this by cutting half a tank of
pump gas(93) with half
a tank of race gas(105). This combination was
certainly not 105
octane but it was real close, probably 103 or better.
Casey
- --- cody <
overclck@satx.rr.com> wrote:
>
"Eighty-seven-octane gasoline is gasoline that contains 87-percent
>
octane and 13-percent heptane (or some other combination of fuels
>
that
> has the same performance of the 87/13 combination of
>
octane/heptane)."
>
> Quoted from that page above... I have
one question... How is this
> possible, or are they in err. Cause,
if you have over 100 octane,
> it
> would mean it has more than 100%
of octane in the fuel... That's
> just
> not possible, as we
all know...
>
> -Cody
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On
> Behalf
> Of dakken
>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 6:08 PM
> Cc:
team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
>
> I find this
discussion interesting. I have found a good web site
> that
>
explains octane rating in easy to understand terms.
>
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question90.htm>
> Could it be that the octane boosters work the same way that
>
tetraethyl
> lead
> worked before it was banned?
>
>
Doug
> 92 Stealth RT TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 21:35:48
-0700
From: "fastmax" <
fastmax@cox.net>
Subject: Fw: Team3S:
Re: Octane Booster Real Effect
They use a single cylinder, variable
compression test engine to determin when
knock occures --- the pump
number is research method + motor method divided
by
2.
Jim
Berry
============================================
>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Jannusch" <
mjannusch@attbi.com>
>
>
>
> > What's the "controlled lab engine"? In order to
determine knock
> > resistance the compression ratio would need to be
adjustable, so I'd
> > think using a particular engine as a standard
would defeat the purpose
> > of the test.
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:57:43
-0400
From: "Philip V. Glazatov" <
gphilip@umich.edu>
Subject: Team3S: No
Brakes - Need Help
Hi Team,
There is probably nobody on the
internet who knows brakes better than
Team3S. Here is my question:
My
brakes suck. I am going racing on Friday and I the brakes are completely
no
good even for daily driving. I bled them and they suck even worse. Could
it
be that I bled them incorrectly? Or could there be anything in the brake
system that went bad?
My brakes were normal until about two months
ago when it was freezing cold
outside and I made several runs around the
block, then tried to slow down
and the pedal was stiff initially, but the
car just kept going. Then the
pedal slowly travelled about half the way and
I had almost full braking
power back. At that time I though that I caught
air somehow. So, today, I
bled the brakes and they are now worse than
before. How could this be? The
pedal has to slooo-o-ww-lly travel through
about 2/3 of the stroke and only
then some braking actions starts. It I hit
the pedal fast it feels like a
shock absorber - the faster you hit it the
harder it is to make it travel.
Meanwhile the car is not stopping until the
pedal travels about 2/3 through
the stroke.
I bled brakes on many
cars before, but never on a car with an ABS. My
friend was helping me, so he
is a witness that I did not do anything weird.
Is there still air trapped
somewhere where I cannot get is, or could there
be something wrong with the
master cylinder or the ABS? I used up two 32 oz
bottles of brake fluid
already. I also bled with the engine running. How do
I get that air out?
Thank you.
Philip
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:26:44
-0500
From: "
merritt@cedar-rapids.net" <
merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: No Brakes - Need Help
Philip:
Yep, sounds like air in
the system. And I agree that it probably happened during the freezing
incident.
First, look for a damaged brake line. It's possible that you
have a leak in one of the lines, and it allows air in. Conversely, it should be
letting fluid out, so you should be able to track it down easily by looking for
brake fluid leaks. Unfortunately, the leak can be anywhere in the system, front
or rear.
Next, it's possible that the freezing temperature somehow
damaged one of the calipers, and it has an internal leak. You can check those by
removing the wheel, removing the spring clamp on the caliper, and sticking a
screwdriver between the pads and the rotor to push back the pistons (as if you
were removing the pads). Then have a friend apply the brakes to see if all
four pistons on that wheel apply pressure properly.
These are the
simplest things I can think of to check at home in your garage.
Rich/slow old poop
>My brakes were normal until about two
months ago when it was freezing cold
>outside and I made several runs
around the block, then tried to slow down
>and the pedal was stiff
initially, but the car just kept going. Then the
>pedal slowly travelled
about half the way and I had almost full braking
>power back. At that
time I though that I caught air somehow. So, today, I
>bled the brakes
and they are now worse than before. How could this be?
***
Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 00:57:34
-0500
From: "cody" <
overclck@satx.rr.com>
Subject: RE:
Team3S: No Brakes - Need Help
I was sent these instructions taken out of
the service manual when I had
troubles with my brakes...
It's a simple
check, cause honestly, it sounds to me like your brake
master
cylinder...
- -Cody
Here are the steps out of the repair
manual.
1. Run the engine for one or two minutes and then stop
it.
2. Step on the breke pedal several times with normal
pressure.
If the pedal dresses fully the first time but
gradually becomes
higher when depressed succeeding times, the booster is
operating
properly.
If the pedal height remains
unchanged, the booster is faulty.
3. With the engine stopped, step
on the brake pedal several times with
the same pressure to make sure the
pedal height will not change.
Then step on the brake pedal
and start the engine.
If the pedal moves doward slightly,
the booster is in good
condition. If there is no change, the booster is
faulty.
4. With the engine running, step on the brake pedal and
then stop the
engine.
Hold the pedal depressed for 30
seconds. If the pedal height does
not change, the booster is in good
condition. If the pedal rises, the
booster is faulty.
-
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of
merritt@cedar-rapids.netSent:
Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:27 AM
To: Philip V. Glazatov;
team3s@team3s.comSubject: Re: Team3S: No
Brakes - Need Help
Philip:
Yep, sounds like air in the system. And
I agree that it probably
happened during the freezing incident.
First,
look for a damaged brake line. It's possible that you have a leak
in one of
the lines, and it allows air in. Conversely, it should be
letting fluid out,
so you should be able to track it down easily by
looking for brake fluid
leaks. Unfortunately, the leak can be anywhere
in the system, front or rear.
Next, it's possible that the freezing temperature somehow damaged one
of
the calipers, and it has an internal leak. You can check those
by
removing the wheel, removing the spring clamp on the caliper,
and
sticking a screwdriver between the pads and the rotor to push back
the
pistons (as if you were removing the pads). Then have a friend apply
the
brakes to see if all four pistons on that wheel apply
pressure
properly.
These are the simplest things I can think of to
check at home in your
garage.
Rich/slow old poop
>My brakes
were normal until about two months ago when it was freezing
cold
>outside and I made several runs around the block, then tried to
slow
down
>and the pedal was stiff initially, but the car just kept
going. Then
the
>pedal slowly travelled about half the way and I had
almost full braking
>power back. At that time I though that I caught
air somehow. So, today,
I
>bled the brakes and they are now worse than
before. How could this be?
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 23:02:05
-0700
From: "dakken" <
dougusmagnus@attbi.com>
Subject:
Re: Team3S: No Brakes - Need Help
It could be a leak somewhere. Has
your fluid level been going down the past
two weeks?
One easy way to
check for a leak is to park your car on a clean piece of
concrete. I
say concrete because leaks show up more on concrete than on
black pavement or
you can use several cardboard boxes. Mark with chalk
where your wheels
are. Start the engine and pump your breaks a lot. Do it
for at
least 2 minutes strieght. Then pull foward past the chalk marks
and
check for wet spots on the pavement. Use a tape measure to figure
out
exactly where the leaks are from the stains and check those areas on
your
car.
If you can't find a leak then it could be your brake booster
is not working.
Check the vacuum line to it first.
If your brake
booster is working fine then your master cylinder may
need
rebuilding.
The last thing to check is the ABS. It also
happens to be the most
expensive.
Doug
92 Stealth RT
TT
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 02:22:57
-0400
From: "Infernalist" <
baali@wwnet.net>
Subject: Team3S: tranny
help please!!!!!
Greets all, im having a really bad day and need some
advice asap please.
I just installed an rps Max series clutch and fidanza
flywheel, my second
time on the clutch so it went pretty smooth. i just (30
minutes ago)
finished buttoning it up and filled the tranny, tranny fluid was
coming out
of the back near the transfer case, i immediately pulled the
exhaust and
transfer case again and noticed it seems to be coming from the
output shaft
? is there a seal there i can replace or something? i assume i
need to pull
the tranny again (sigh) any help would be GREATLY
appreciated.
Ron
1992 RT/TT
Apexi AVC-R (.95 Bar)
Gutted
Rear Precat
TurboXS H-RFL BOV
DN Performance Y-Pipe
Stillen
DownPipe
Fidanza Flywheel
RPS Max Series Clutch
15g's (on the
way)
8mm Wires
Autometer Boost Gauge on A-pillar
K&N FIPK
Lead
Foot <---- That mod was free ;)
*** Info:
http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm
***
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 03:34:23
-0400
From: "Omar Malik" <
ojm@iname.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: No
Brakes - Need Help
I agree with cody on using this test procedure.
Symptoms sound to me like a
faulty brake booster or brake booster check
valve. That would be the first
thing to check. The reason I say faulty check
valve is because it takes the
engine a few seconds after coming off the gas
for vacuum to build up.
Normally the check valve keeps the booster under
vacuum only, not allowing
any pressure to get in when you're under boost. The
booster keeps a vacuum
reserve for stepping on the brakes immediately off the
throttle.. If the
check valve were faulty.. There is no vacuum reserve and
you have to wait
for vacuum to build up in the intake before the brakes
appear to work. Or..
it could be the booster itself is faulty.. Check both
and let us know how it
goes.
Omar
92 r/t
- -----Original
Message-----
From:
owner-team3s@team3s.com
[mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com]On Behalf
Of cody
Sent: Thursday, April
11, 2002 1:58 AM
To:
merritt@cedar-rapids.net; 'Philip V.
Glazatov';
team3s@team3s.comSubject:
RE: Team3S: No Brakes - Need Help
I was sent these instructions taken out
of the service manual when I had
troubles with my brakes...
It's a
simple check, cause honestly, it sounds to me like your brake
master
cylinder...
- -Cody
Here are the steps out of the repair
manual.
-------------snip----------->