Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth   Thursday, January 3 2002   Volume 01 : Number 716




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:41:25 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Running Rich (WAS: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's)

> This is my theory.  I think this logic of running our cars
> rich to suppress premature detanation is not wise.  You're
> solving a big problem (detonation) but creating a smaller
> one (knock).

I don't agree.  Knock is the weaker version of detonation.  You aren't
creating a new problem, you are still reducing a more severe problem into a
more manageable problem.  Knock can be at least partially compensated for by
retarding timing.  Detonation happens early during the compression stroke
and tries to force the crank in the wrong direction and causes parts to
dissociate from themselves.  (Not good)

> By running rich, the extra fuel that didn't get burned
> might ignite.  While the explosion from knock isn't as
> damaging as the explosion from detanation it is still
> damaging.

If you are running rich, there's no more oxygen to burn the "extra" fuel.
The extra fuel at this point helps reduce cylinder temperatures so you don't
melt parts or cause preignition.  Without oxygen to burn there's no further
reaction possible.

> You need something that will always keep your A/F
> stoichimetric.  I don't think the VPC or ARCII do a
> good enough job at this.

You can't run stoichimetric when on boost.  That burns way too hot with that
dense of a mixture.  Parts go boom, pistons melt, preigntion and detonation
show their ugly faces.  Overly hot exhaust gas temps = bad news and broken
pistons.  You can run stoichimetric on boost for one dragstrip run, but be
prepared for the nasty engine noises by the time you reach the 1/8 mile.

> If you want to cool the A/F mixture so you can run
> more boost you should be using a better intercooler,
> water injection, ram air, possibly an aftermarket hood
> with a cowl, etc.  Running rich isn't the solution.

Yup, tried more efficient intercoolers, and I use water injection...  "Ram
air" (I think you meant cold-air induction) or a hood designed to cool the
engine bay may be a benefit if your intercoolers aren't able to do their
job.  Better intercoolers should negate (or reduce) the need for a cooler
engine bay.

> How does everyone else feel about running rich to
> suppress detonation?

It is a necessity.  You can certainly go "too far" and run far too rich and
cause problems with the rings not sealing as well as simply making less
horsepower by running far too rich - but you do need "sufficient" fuel to
keep the cylinders cool enough.  Sufficient is substantially more than
stoich.  Stoich is great for cruising, no more - especially on a turbo
motor.

The optimum way (in my opinion) is to set a target EGT that you are
unwilling to risk going beyond, run enough fuel and/or water injection to
keep knock and detonation away while staying below your maximum EGT.  Adjust
the fuel and/or water to try to get good timing advance.  Take whatever
measures are possible to reduce hotspots in the cylinder (smooth pistons, no
cylinder irregularities, clean valves, no carbon deposits, colder range
spark plugs) to prevent preignition.  That's about 90% of the battle right
there.  Beyond that is tweaking to try to extract maximum horsepower - which
you are really going to need a dyno to do well.

One of the other problems with these cars is that the stock pistons are crap
and are easily destroyed.  Anything other than forged pistons in a
high-boost motor is really just asking for trouble, at least once you get in
the 15G and beyond set of mods - it is too easy for things to go bad very
quickly once you get to that point.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 01:03:15 -0600
From: "Philip V. Glazatov" <gphilip@umich.edu>
Subject: Team3S: Stock pistons question; was RE: Running Rich

At 11:41 PM 01/02/02, Jannusch, Matt wrote:
>One of the other problems with these cars is that the stock pistons are crap
>and are easily destroyed.  Anything other than forged pistons in a
>high-boost motor is really just asking for trouble, at least once you get in
>the 15G and beyond set of mods - it is too easy for things to go bad very
>quickly once you get to that point.

Sorry, this was probably discussed before. Do the piston leftovers and the
rods mess up the block when pistons shatter? I bet you need to replace the
head or at least put new valves it, but those of you who shattered their
pistons, did you guys have to replace or bore out the block too?

Thanks,

Philip


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 01:55:29 -0500
From: Romachka21@netscape.net (Roman)
Subject: RE: Team3S: Stock pistons question; was RE: Running Rich

Philip,

After my motor stalled and the Oil with Antifreeze started leaking I knew there was a problem. When the motor was opened up "at Altered Atmosphere" I had two holes through the block. My cylinder wall had a hole in it and no Piston was there. All I had was a rod with a pin. The pin is what actually punctured the whole in the cylinder wall. But, it looked like a bard of the piston went through the block it self. I will try to post pictures for people to see.
I ended up getting a new block "bottom end" and hopefully nothing within the engine bay is damaged from the debris flying at hundreds of miles per hour chopping everything in its way.
Also that is why the oil and antifreeze was leaking out. If you don't have oil leakage than you should be fine some what.
I hope that helps.

Roman G. 94 VR-4 still at AAM getting the race prepped motor to replace the one that blew.

"Philip V. Glazatov" <gphilip@umich.edu> wrote:

>At 11:41 PM 01/02/02, Jannusch, Matt wrote:
>>>Sorry, this was probably discussed before. Do the piston leftovers and the
>rods mess up the block when pistons shatter? I bet you need to replace the
>head or at least put new valves it, but those of you who shattered their
>pistons, did you guys have to replace or bore out the block too?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Philip
>
>
>***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
- --




__________________________________________________________________
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:08:33 -0500
From: "Aamer" <aamer.mail@verizon.net>
Subject: Team3S: Stoichimetric A/F ratio

Sorry if this is bit of a stupid question, but can someone tell me exactly
what is "stoichimetric" as far as A/F ratios are concerned? Refer to the
original message I have pasted below if you need to.

Thanks.

Aamer Abbas
'94 3000 GT (DOHC -- Naturally Aspirated)
email: aamer@thepentagon.com
fax: (707) 982-8817 [add +1 country code if faxing from outside the USA]

- --------------Original Message --------------------
<snip>
>> You need something that will always keep your A/F
>> stoichimetric.  I don't think the VPC or ARCII do a
>> good enough job at this.

>You can't run stoichimetric when on boost.  That burns way too hot with
that
>dense of a mixture.  Parts go boom, pistons melt, preigntion and detonation
>show their ugly faces.  Overly hot exhaust gas temps = bad news and broken
>pistons.  You can run stoichimetric on boost for one dragstrip run, but be
>prepared for the nasty engine noises by the time you reach the 1/8 mile.
<snip>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 07:12:04 -0600
From: "Philip V. Glazatov" <gphilip@umich.edu>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Stock pistons question; was RE: Running Rich

At 12:55 AM 01/03/02, Roman wrote:
>If you don't have oil leakage than you should be fine some what.

Thanks for the info. I my engine is fine and I am planning to keep it that
way. I am just trying to weigh the advantages of installing forged pistons
as a preventative measure before anything happens.

Philip


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 07:21:15 -0600
From: "Philip V. Glazatov" <gphilip@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Stoichimetric A/F ratio

It is a 14.7 ratio. It is not good for anything. You want something like
11-12 for power and 16-17 for fuel economy.

Philip

At 01:08 AM 01/03/02, Aamer wrote:
>Sorry if this is bit of a stupid question, but can someone tell me exactly
>what is "stoichimetric" as far as A/F ratios are concerned? Refer to the
>original message I have pasted below if you need to.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Aamer Abbas
>'94 3000 GT (DOHC -- Naturally Aspirated)
>email: aamer@thepentagon.com
>fax: (707) 982-8817 [add +1 country code if faxing from outside the USA]
>
>--------------Original Message --------------------
><snip>
> >> You need something that will always keep your A/F
> >> stoichimetric.  I don't think the VPC or ARCII do a
> >> good enough job at this.
>
> >You can't run stoichimetric when on boost.  That burns way too hot with
>that
> >dense of a mixture.  Parts go boom, pistons melt, preigntion and detonation
> >show their ugly faces.  Overly hot exhaust gas temps = bad news and broken
> >pistons.  You can run stoichimetric on boost for one dragstrip run, but be
> >prepared for the nasty engine noises by the time you reach the 1/8 mile.
><snip>
>
>
>***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:35:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Team3S: Re: Running Rich

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Philip V. Glazatov" <gphilip@umich.edu>
> To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Running Rich (WAS: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's)
>
> Running rich is not the answer. Read Roger's technical note for
> more insite: http://www.team3s.com/FAQknock.htm

There are several mis-statements in Roger's article that is referred
to.

1) "We only cured the sympton [sic]".
The "symptom" IS the problem. If you eliminate measurable knock, you
have eliminated the problem. Period. Knock is almost certain to occur
at some level of cylinder pressure and gasoline quality. It is
natural, not a sign that something is "wrong". But it is also
unwanted and damaging, and needs to be prevented as much as possible.

2) "... run way too rich as well as we'll lose some horses due to
this".
Many books show power output vs. A/F. The curve peaks around 12.5 A/F
and is less steep to the rich side than the lean side. This means
that power is much less sensitive to being "rich" than being "lean".

3) ".. the gases cannot go out of the combustion chamber and will be
burst again in the next cycle ... causing a lean situation".
What? When running rich, all oxygen should be consumed and there
should be left over fuel. The phenomenon Roger refers to is called
exhaust gas reversion, where some of the spent fuel-air mixture
cannot leave the combustion chamber or is drawn back in to it, and so
prevents the chamber from filling completely with fresh charge. The
result of course in this case will be extra "fuel" in the chamber,
not a "lean" situation (extra oxygen).

Philip, you should select your "technical" articles more carefully,
as should Team3S.

Running rich IS the answer - up to a point. This is the standard way
to cool the combustion chamber to reduce knock. This happens to be
exactly what our ECM does in response to severe knock (as well as
reduce timing advance and boost). I have observed this using the
datalogger. There are of course better solutions, but non so easy as
to dump a little (or a lot of) extra fuel.

One solution is to improve the squish area (especially the clearance)
so that more turbulence is created to reduce "lean" areas in the
chamber. Cooler charge also helps (better intercooling, water
injection). Nitrous is a mixed bag as the N2O cools the intake charge
(a lot!) but the reduced N content increases the combustion heat.

If you guys need some REAL technical references for how engines work
look through these books.

A. Graham Bell, 1998, Four-Stroke Performance Tuning, 2nd ed.:
Haynes, 327 p.

John B. Heywood, 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals:
McGraw-Hill, 930 p.

Richard Stone, 1999, Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines, 3rd
edition: SAE International, 641 p.

There are many more listed on my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius/2-refs.htm

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:54:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?

I have service manuals for 1991-1996 plus 1999, but not (yet) for
1997 and 1998. Would someone tell me if the 1997 ECM connectors are
"like" the 1996? Also is the 1998 ECM "like" the 1999?

I need to make sure the info is accurate on my web page below.
http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius7/j7-2-ecu94.htm

Thanks,

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:49:56 -0500
From: "Alan C. Sheffield" <a92rttt@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Lucius" <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
> why do we *need* an aftermarket ECM? (I know some people just like
> to play, experiment, or be different.)

I think the answer is simple. Look at matts car Eletronic Boost Controller
and an arc2 with limited dataloggin abilitys.

An aftermarket ECU (based on AEM's claims) would give us all the abilitys in
one part for less(same?) than the cost of the EBC/ARC2 and you get full
datalogging abilitys.

If I were planning on major HP from my car I'd consider it as the correct
upgrade path.

Alan

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:06:18 -0500
From: "Furman, Russell" <RFurman2@MassMutual.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?

EUREKA!!!!!!   I do not know if anyone remembers my discussion of using a
voltage clamp to prevent fuel cut  ( I am not going to start that thread
again I promise)  But as I had suspected our ECU uses voltage ranges as
operating parameters.   This lends credence to my idea of using the Field
SFC and having different fuel maps for different boost settings and being
able to change between them at the push of a button :)  Instead of turning
2-3 knobs (sorry Jeff that is too much work for an unexpected street race)
See the link below from Jeff's site (thanks again Jeff)  and maybe point me
in the right direction( input or output terminals) as to help me experiment.
I still have the damn thing sitting on my desk b/c I refused sell it when I
sold the "other lady"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Lucius [SMTP:stealthman92@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:54 AM
> To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
> Subject: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?
>
> I have service manuals for 1991-1996 plus 1999, but not (yet) for
> 1997 and 1998. Would someone tell me if the 1997 ECM connectors are
> "like" the 1996? Also is the 1998 ECM "like" the 1999?
>
> I need to make sure the info is accurate on my web page below.
> http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius7/j7-2-ecu94.htm
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:10:31 -0500
From: "Furman, Russell" <RFurman2@MassMutual.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?

Sorry I forgot the link........ 

http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius7/j7-ecu91-2.gif

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Furman, Russell
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: 'Jeff Lucius'
> Cc: 'Team 3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?
>
> EUREKA!!!!!!   I do not know if anyone remembers my discussion of using a
> voltage clamp to prevent fuel cut  ( I am not going to start that thread
> again I promise)  But as I had suspected our ECU uses voltage ranges as
> operating parameters.   This lends credence to my idea of using the Field
> SFC and having different fuel maps for different boost settings and being
> able to change between them at the push of a button :)  Instead of turning
> 2-3 knobs (sorry Jeff that is too much work for an unexpected street race)
> See the link below from Jeff's site (thanks again Jeff)  and maybe point
> me
> in the right direction( input or output terminals) as to help me
> experiment.
> I still have the damn thing sitting on my desk b/c I refused sell it when
> I
> sold the "other lady"
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jeff Lucius [SMTP:stealthman92@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:54 AM
> > To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
> > Subject: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?
> >
> > I have service manuals for 1991-1996 plus 1999, but not (yet) for
> > 1997 and 1998. Would someone tell me if the 1997 ECM connectors are
> > "like" the 1996? Also is the 1998 ECM "like" the 1999?
> >
> > I need to make sure the info is accurate on my web page below.
> > http://www.geocities.com/lutransys/jlucius7/j7-2-ecu94.htm
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:24:21 -0600
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole

Alex,

As they probably mentioned to you it all depends on where the damage is and
how bad it is.  One option is to ship it to them to try to fix.  They may be
able to straighten it w/o having to re-chrome it.  Another option is to ask
if they have any used wheels that have been refurbished.  They sell ours for
about $350.  They told me the same thing about some rim damage and I asked
them to do the best job they could and they were able to fix it.  I think
that they were giving you a worst case scenario but it is ultimately up to
you.

Tom Gifford is the person to talk to over there.  They took care of me on 3
different occasions and I was very pleased with the results.

Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:20 PM
> To: Black, Dave (ICT)
> Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole
>
> I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I
> was
> told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be able
> to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would turn
> black.
>
>     Any ideas?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
> '95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
> To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it was
> bad
> > enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago
> area!
> > I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided to
> > replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had fixed.
> I
> > got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.
> They
> > were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per
> wheel).
> > These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies
> go
> > for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> > impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
> >
> > The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black from
> 3Si
> > sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
> >
> > Dave 95VR4
> > http://www.daveblack.net
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > > To: 'Team3S'
> > > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
> for?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >     Alex
> > >
> > > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:31:33 -0600
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

Since I can't go directly into the ECU since I have pre-OBDII, does anyone
know if the MSD Knock Alert sensor will work on a 1995 VR4?  I'm not sure if
it taps into the ECU or not.

Dave 95VR4

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Gerl [SMTP:roger.gerl@bluewin.ch]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:32 PM
> To: TEAM3S@STEALTH-3000GT.ST
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Data logger for 96 VR-4
>
> Alain,
>
> The Pocketlogger is a PALM Adapted TMO Datalogger and any OBDII software
> available currently cannot read the knock sensor. Believe me, it can't !
>
> Roger
> 93'3000GT TT
> www.rec.ch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alan C. Sheffield" <a92rttt@hotmail.com>
> To: <TEAM3S@STEALTH-3000GT.ST>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Data logger for 96 VR-4
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
> > > And how can the Pocketlogger log the knock sensor ?????????
> > >
> >
> > I have an 1st gen ODBI car so I can't answer that question.
> >
> > But, Why would it not be able to? The TMO Datalogger and the
> Pocketlogger
> > for ODBI can.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:39:31 -0700
From: "Moe Prasad" <mprasad01@earthlink.net>
Subject: Team3S: Brake Pads?

Has anyone used "Brutestop" brake pads from Raybestos?

Are they any good?

Rgds
Moe


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:41:20 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: 1997 & 1998 ECM?

> EUREKA!!!!!!  I do not know if anyone remembers my
> discussion of using a voltage clamp to prevent
> fuel cut  ( I am not going to start that thread
> again I promise)  But as I had suspected our ECU
> uses voltage ranges as operating parameters.

> This lends credence to my idea of using the
> Field SFC and having different fuel maps for
> different boost settings and being able to
> change between them at the push of a button :)

The ECU does not use voltage for the airflow signal - it uses a pulsed DC
frequency signal.  Those values you see in the are only the test values.
Notice that it shows the same test voltage at both idle and 2000 RPM in the
example...  That's because the meter is too slow to see the pulses and
squishes them together into an average voltage and displays that.


5V     +-----+     +-----+
       |     |     |     |
       |     |     |     |
0V  ___|     |_____|     |___


5V   +--+  +--+  +--+  +--+
     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
0V __|  |__|  |__|  |__|  |__


Both these waveforms will show around 2.5V DC if measured on a voltmeter,
but the signals show very different values to the ECU.  A "voltage clamp"
won't help prevent fuel cut because it isn't the voltage that is changing to
indicate more airflow - it is the frequency increasing.

Since the Field SFC is a voltage-type controller it won't work on a 3/S (or
a DSM or any other Karman-Vortex style MAF sensor).

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:28:42 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Running Rich

> There are several mis-statements in Roger's article that is referred
> to.

Aha ?

> 1) "We only cured the sympton [sic]".
> The "symptom" IS the problem. If you eliminate measurable knock, you
> have eliminated the problem. Period. Knock is almost certain to occur
> at some level of cylinder pressure and gasoline quality. It is
> natural, not a sign that something is "wrong". But it is also
> unwanted and damaging, and needs to be prevented as much as possible.

Knock is a symptom that occurs due to some causes (misfires, too lean, hot
psots, carbon depostis, pre-ignition). Knock is the problem caused by some
things happend in the chamber.

> 2) "... run way too rich as well as we'll lose some horses due to
> this".
> Many books show power output vs. A/F. The curve peaks around 12.5 A/F
> and is less steep to the rich side than the lean side. This means
> that power is much less sensitive to being "rich" than being "lean".

Runing too rich costs power. Jeff, try this on the dyno, you can see how the
power decreases !

> 3) ".. the gases cannot go out of the combustion chamber and will be
> burst again in the next cycle ... causing a lean situation".
> What? When running rich, all oxygen should be consumed and there
> should be left over fuel. The phenomenon Roger refers to is called
> exhaust gas reversion, where some of the spent fuel-air mixture
> cannot leave the combustion chamber or is drawn back in to it, and so
> prevents the chamber from filling completely with fresh charge.

Same what I said only more words.

> The result of course in this case will be extra "fuel" in the chamber,
> not a "lean" situation (extra oxygen).

Aha, so you are saying that when the chamber cannot be filled that then
there is too much fuel ? But we do not have direct injection cars and a
mixture will enter the chamber. If it cannot enter so why can then the
mixture be rich ? This is what causes a temprarily lean situation in one or
more cycles in one or more cylinders.

> Philip, you should select your "technical" articles more carefully,
> as should Team3S.

Yes, Philip listen to Jeffrey and don't read others than his site ! Often
cannot be avoided, LOL

> Running rich IS the answer - up to a point. This is the standard way
> to cool the combustion chamber to reduce knock.

Standard way on Big Iron design ! Washing out cylinders, lots more carbon
deposits, fuel in the oil and more are the "benefits" of this too. But sure,
if you have enough fuel and the right amount of air can be delivered then
increase it until it rinses out of the tailpipe. And also check out out some
datalogs and you will see that even with a extreme rich mixture and high IDC
there is knock. So did increasing fuel help to prevent it ??

> This happens to be
> exactly what our ECM does in response to severe knock (as well as
> reduce timing advance and boost). I have observed this using the
> datalogger. There are of course better solutions, but non so easy as
> to dump a little (or a lot of) extra fuel.

Yes, the ECU does this as it tries to fight a cause for some time until it
gives up. But this doesn't mean that this fight must be always on. Better
not.

> One solution is to improve the squish area (especially the clearance)
> so that more turbulence is created to reduce "lean" areas in the
> chamber. Cooler charge also helps (better intercooling, water
> injection). Nitrous is a mixed bag as the N2O cools the intake charge
> (a lot!) but the reduced N content increases the combustion heat.

Good input, really :-)))

> If you guys need some REAL technical references for how engines work
> look through these books.

Yes, do so ! Afterwards write your own book like Jeffrey does.

Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch



***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:43:21 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

> Since I can't go directly into the ECU since I have
> pre-OBDII, does anyone know if the MSD Knock Alert sensor
> will work on a 1995 VR4?  I'm not sure if it taps into
> the ECU or not.

It uses its own knock sensor that you have to screw into the block..  I've
got one, but it isn't on the car yet.  I'll report my experiences once the
car gets back on the road.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:45:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Brake Pads?

Its made by Raybestos..nuff said.  :^)

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Moe Prasad wrote:

> Has anyone used "Brutestop" brake pads from Raybestos?
>
> Are they any good?
>
> Rgds
> Moe
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>

- ---
Geoff Mohler


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:49:55 -0600
From: overclck@ies.net (Cody Graham)
Subject: RE: Team3S: Brake Pads?

Yah, got my Porterfield R4S broken in (man was that stinky). 

There is no comparison.  I am sure your "brutestop" pads are ok street
pads, just don't try stopping too quickly too many times...

Am very happy I paid the little extra money for real pads...

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Geoff Mohler
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Moe Prasad
Cc: Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: Re: Team3S: Brake Pads?

Its made by Raybestos..nuff said.  :^)

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Moe Prasad wrote:

> Has anyone used "Brutestop" brake pads from Raybestos?
>
> Are they any good?
>
> Rgds
> Moe
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>

- ---
Geoff Mohler


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:52:35 -0500
From: "Payne, Scott" <SPayne@hunton.com>
Subject: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i

Was wondering what settings you guys are using on this controller? I am set
for 58, gain 15. Limiter set for 15.9 psi with a 7 for boost reduction if
limit is hit.

What is a safe boost to acheive with a 94 twin turbo, gutted cats, highflow
main cat, downpipe, y-pipe, HKS DLI ignition, K&N filter charger, BLITZ Dual
SBC-i  and NGK plugs?








***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:53:05 -0600
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Running Rich

[Willis, Charles E.]  Hard to say which of these is correct - the
partly combusted gasses will indeed contain some unburned fuel, and little
or no oxygen, but the concentration of unburned fuel in the exhaust gasses
will certainly be at a lower concentration than the fuel concentration in
the incoming fuel-air mixture.  The resulting mixture in the chamber will be
"richer" than the incoming fuel-air stream, that is more unburned
fuel-to-oxygen ratio than intended.

I think Jeff is right if all the oygen is indeed consumed in the
previous combustin cycle.

 
> > 3) ".. the gases cannot go out of the combustion chamber and will be
> > burst again in the next cycle ... causing a lean situation".
> > What? When running rich, all oxygen should be consumed and there
> > should be left over fuel. The phenomenon Roger refers to is called
> > exhaust gas reversion, where some of the spent fuel-air mixture
> > cannot leave the combustion chamber or is drawn back in to it, and so
> > prevents the chamber from filling completely with fresh charge.
>
> Same what I said only more words.
>
> > The result of course in this case will be extra "fuel" in the chamber,
> > not a "lean" situation (extra oxygen).
>
> Aha, so you are saying that when the chamber cannot be filled that then
> there is too much fuel ? But we do not have direct injection cars and a
> mixture will enter the chamber. If it cannot enter so why can then the
> mixture be rich ? This is what causes a temprarily lean situation in one
> or
> more cycles in one or more cylinders.
>
>

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:16:39 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's

I can't wait for the first experiences.... buy it, install it and ... report
please ;-)

Oh, AEM said that there is onyl one harness for all years ... interesting. I
emailed them again with the question regarding OBDII having troubles with a
non-existing stock ECU and non-respondign sub-devices. No answer
anymore.....

Gooood luck for the guinea-pig
Roger


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Todd D.Shelton" <tds@brightok.net>
To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's


>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jannusch, Matt <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
> To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Date: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's
>
>
> >
> >The PMS says it works on all years also - and it does!  You just tell
them
> >what year car you have and they send the right cables along.  Probably
> >something similar with the AEM.  At least you'd hope so.
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --
> --
>
> I hope so too since they (AEM) lists the part # as :
>
> 3000GT VR4  1992-00  30-1311
>
> They also say:
>
> This user-programmable system plugs directly into a vehicle's factory
>  ECU harness and requires no additional wiring.
>
> Something doesn't add up.  Not only are the plugs different
> but the wires/numbering don't match up exactly from 1st to
> 2nd generation.  Even when connecting something as "simple"
> as an ITC - you have to access a different wiring diagram depending
> on year and whether it is a US model or not.
>
> More for those that are interested:
>
> The AEM EMS's infinitely-adjustable software allows tuners to program
>  virtually any combination of engine control, power adders and auxiliary
> devices, and accurately deliver proper amounts of fuel and correct
>  ignition timing for ANY boost level or operating condition.
>
> Plug & Play Programmable Engine Management System
>
> Plug & Play Technology - No additional wiring necessary
> Installs in minutes!
>
> Runs on Windows™ Based Software
>
> 16/32 Hybrid High-Speed Processor
>
> Base Maps included
>
> Onboard datalogging
>
> Sequential Fuel Injection
>
> Interactive, User-friendly Manual
>
> Nitrous, Boost and Knock control
>
> Forced induction compatible
>
>
> They also sell a 2nd version called:
>
> The AEM Race Programmable Engine Management System
>
> And it lists:
>
> User configurable Windows™ software (requires a minimum Pentium 100 PC
> Onboard Datalogging
> Comes with complete library of tuning tips and system design
> User programmable inputs and outputs*
> Up to 10 cylinder sequential fuel injection with individual cylinder trim
> Up to 10 cylinder wasted spark distributor less ignition with individual
> cylinder trim
> Boost Control
> Comprehensive Nitrous Control
> Twin O2 sensor closed loop control (Wide range, and UEGO)
> Comprehensive easy to follow
> wiring instructions
> Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT) feedback
> Idle motor control
> Extensive Electronic Automatic
> transmission control
> 16/32 bit High Speed Processor
> Interactive User Friendly manual
> Twin Knock sensing control
> Requires Wiring of Vehicle
>
> __________________________________
>
> I can't hardly keep track of everything I'm monitoring/setting up now!
> Imagine all that .....
>
>
> - tds
>
>
>
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:11:31 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

Folks,

We all speak from this and that but in general we speak of our emeny we
would like fight against. No matter what Jeffrey and others are saying I
like to outline that knock is the final result and knock is the only thing
we can "hear" or measure (by a knock sensor). But knock appears due to
combustion problems. Pre-ignition, lean situtaions and others are such
causes that finally are detectable by ... knock.

Here a good explanation about preignition and detonation that causes knockI
have stored and unfortunately cannot find the source of the text again (but
Jeffrey, please note : it's not from me ... but maybe from you ??) :

The knocking sounds you hear are the cylinder walls set into oscillation by
intense pressure waves, caused by abnormal combustion. Normal combustion is
a controlled burn that starts from the spark plug and spreads outward,
causing a pressure rise in the combustion chamber. This pressure is then
converted into torque on the crankshaft. Ideally, the peak pressures will
occur about ten to fifteen degrees after top dead center (TDC), as the
piston is on its way down.

Detonation is a form of abnormal combustion that starts off right, but at
the last millisecond, something goes wrong. The remaining air-fuel mixture,
called the "end gas", explodes all at once, instead of burning in a
controlled way. Resultant engine damage is caused by an instantaneous
pressure rise that can excede 1500 psi. This is more than double the normal
peak combustion pressure, and will blow head gaskets, break piston ring
lands and hammer the rod bearings. Another form of damage seen is that the
tops of the pistons will be eroded and can even melt.

High octane fuels are resistant to detonation because they contain compounds
that slow down the chemical chain reaction we call combustion. If left
unchecked, these chain reactions would quickly escalate, resulting in
increasing damage to the piston and other engine components. All fuels,
regardless of octane, have a knock limit. This is reached when the
temperature of the "end gas" reaches an autoignition point. Combustion
chamber designers use high swirl inlets and large "quench areas" to fight
this "autoignition" problem. There are other factors beyond these mechanical
design features which influence "end gas" temperatures. Some of these are:
(1) Intake charge temperature, (2) Coolant temperature, (3) Compression
Ratio, (4) Boost pressure, (5) Spark timing, (6) Air-fuel ratio, and (6)
Humidity.

An increase in compression ratio, boost pressure, or spark timing will
increase peak cylinder pressure, which in turn raises the "end gas"
temperature. Higher inlet and coolant temperatures also increase the "end
gas" temperature. Richer mixtures can be used to cool the charge. At some
point beyond about 10:1, however, will again increase the tendency to
detonate. A decrease in humidity will also tend to increase detonation.

Preignition and detonation are two separate and distinct events. It was
first pointed out as far back as 1906 that the two phenomena were not only
quite distinct but were in fact not related to each other. In the first
place, preignition in itself does not produce an audible "knock" and if it
is audible at all it could be described as a "dull thud". Because
preignition is frequently brought about as a result of persistent
detonation, the distinct "knock or ping" of the latter came quite
erroneously to be associated with it.

It is by no means uncommon for preignition, or in this case it would be more
correct to describe it as autoignition, to occur at the same phase as the
timed spark. In this case the ignition can be switched off, and the engine
could continue to run perfectly steadily without the slightest observable
change in performance, sound, or any other characteristic. The danger,
however, lies in the fact that all control of timing can be lost and
ignition may creep in earlier in the cycle.

The danger of preignition lies not so much in the development of high
pressures but rather in the very great increase in heat flow to the piston
and cylinder walls when the ignition occurs too early in the cycle. This
increase in heat flow, in turn, raises still further the temperature of the
hot spot or surface which is causing the preignition resulting in even
earlier ignition. At some point the temperatures are elevated to the point
where the incoming charge is ignited, causing backfiring in the inlet tract.
The belief, still widely held, that preignition can give rise to dangerously
high cylinder pressures is totally false. Under no circumstances is the peak
pressure resulting from preignition appreciably higher than from a
spark-initiated ignition and, in both cases, the peak is reached when the
maximum pressure is attained at or just after top dead center, that is to
say, about 10 degrees earlier than the normal optimum. As the time of
ignition is further advanced by either advancing the time of the spark or by
earlier preignition, the maximum cylinder pressure falls again due to the
excessive heat loss, for the piston is then compressing gas at or about its
maximum temperature, and the intensity of heat flow is increased many times.
The danger lies not in the production of excessive pressures but of
excessive heat fow. The intense heat flow in the affected cylinder can
result in piston seizure followed by the breaking-up of the piston with
catastrophic results to the whole engine.

In nine cases out of ten, preignition is initiated by overheating of the
sparkplug electrodes or some sharp point or edge that has gone "critical".
We are accustomed these days to focus all our attention on the subject of
detonation for it is the limiting factor controlling the performance of a
spark-ignition engine. We are apt to forget that the real danger is that it
leads on to preignition. In itself, detonation is not dangerous... It is the
preignition it gives rise to that can so easily wreck an engine.


Hope I brought some light into this.

Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:33:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
> To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:11 AM
> Subject: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

> Jeffrey, please note : it's not from me ... but maybe from you ??)
:

Nope, not from me. I'm just a simple, country, mechanic. :)

More info for those that are interested in detonation.

The Mystery of Detonation By Dr. Robin Tuluie, Ph.D
http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mcrob/rt-fuel2.html

What is detonation and how to prevent it By Bob Hewitt
http://www.misterfixit.com/deton.htm

The Causes of Internal Engine Knock, and How to Eliminate it By Ray
T. Bohacz
http://zhome.com/ZCMnL/PICS/detonation/detonation.html

Lots more good stuff on the Tech page at my web site.

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 09:51:57 -0800
From: Michael Gerhard <gerhard1@llnl.gov>
Subject: Team3S: Braided brake lines

I'm trying to buy stainless steel braided brakes lines for my '91 3000GT
VR4 and am told by Auto Options Salon that there is a very long wait for
SMC brakes lines. They have been able to locate another supplier that can
offer Russell brake lines.

I'm wondering if anyone has heard of Russell and if they have any comments
or experience.

Auto Options Salon says they could get Russell brake lines in a week.

Thanks for any input you can provide.



- --------------------------------------------------------------
Michael A. Gerhard     1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4  Pearl White


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:44:01 -0500
From: "Berrios, Victor L  CIV" <VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil>
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i

Hi:
This unit has four channels. My fourth channel is set as follows:

Boost 14.7 PSI
Gain 25
Limiter 14.7, boost reduction limit 2.

I think 58 is kind of low (~8-9 PSI). Experts help me here.

Did you have it in the "auto" or "manual" mode?

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Payne, Scott [mailto:SPayne@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Team3S (E-mail)
Subject: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


Was wondering what settings you guys are using on this controller? I am set
for 58, gain 15. Limiter set for 15.9 psi with a 7 for boost reduction if
limit is hit.

What is a safe boost to acheive with a 94 twin turbo, gutted cats, highflow
main cat, downpipe, y-pipe, HKS DLI ignition, K&N filter charger, BLITZ Dual
SBC-i  and NGK plugs?








***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:51:43 -0500
From: "Furman, Russell" <RFurman2@MassMutual.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braided brake lines

SMC, is that the same as the Goodrich lines?   b/c I had Goodrich lines on
my MKIV and they were just a good quality as the TRD versions.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Gerhard [SMTP:gerhard1@llnl.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:52 PM
> To: Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
> Subject: Team3S: Braided brake lines
>
> I'm trying to buy stainless steel braided brakes lines for my '91 3000GT
> VR4 and am told by Auto Options Salon that there is a very long wait for
> SMC brakes lines. They have been able to locate another supplier that can
> offer Russell brake lines.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has heard of Russell and if they have any comments
>
> or experience.
>
> Auto Options Salon says they could get Russell brake lines in a week.
>
> Thanks for any input you can provide.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael A. Gerhard     1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4  Pearl White
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:45:10 -0500
From: "Berrios, Victor L  CIV" <VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil>
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

Hi Matt:
Where did you get it from? Price?

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4, Searching for knock alert


- -----Original Message-----
From: Jannusch, Matt [mailto:mjannusch@marketwatch.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:43 PM
To: Team3s (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?


> Since I can't go directly into the ECU since I have
> pre-OBDII, does anyone know if the MSD Knock Alert sensor
> will work on a 1995 VR4?  I'm not sure if it taps into
> the ECU or not.

It uses its own knock sensor that you have to screw into the block..  I've
got one, but it isn't on the car yet.  I'll report my experiences once the
car gets back on the road.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:53:24 -0600
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braided brake lines

Just bought some Russell brake lines for my boss' 1969 351 Mustang Mach I
(part of the "Ultimate Suck-up Crhistmas Package"). They appear to be the
same construction as the Goodridge brake lines we have on three VR4's.

Try Goodridge.

Chuck Willis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Gerhard [SMTP:gerhard1@llnl.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
> Subject: Team3S: Braided brake lines
>
> I'm trying to buy stainless steel braided brakes lines for my '91 3000GT
> VR4 and am told by Auto Options Salon that there is a very long wait for
> SMC brakes lines. They have been able to locate another supplier that can
> offer Russell brake lines.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has heard of Russell and if they have any comments
>
> or experience.
>
> Auto Options Salon says they could get Russell brake lines in a week.
>
> Thanks for any input you can provide.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael A. Gerhard     1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4  Pearl White
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:54:39 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

> Hi Matt:
> Where did you get it from? Price?

Jeg's High Performance...

http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prrfnbr=26719&prmenbr=
76

Part number 121-8964

$143.00.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:56:26 -0500
From: "Payne, Scott" <SPayne@hunton.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i

channel 1 =48
channel 2 =53
channel 3 =58
channel 4=auto 15.9
gain is 15 on all channels

- -----Original Message-----
From: Berrios, Victor L CIV [mailto:VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:44 PM
To: 'tEAM3S@STEALTH-3000GT.ST'
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


Hi:
This unit has four channels. My fourth channel is set as follows:

Boost 14.7 PSI
Gain 25
Limiter 14.7, boost reduction limit 2.

I think 58 is kind of low (~8-9 PSI). Experts help me here.

Did you have it in the "auto" or "manual" mode?

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Payne, Scott [mailto:SPayne@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Team3S (E-mail)
Subject: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


Was wondering what settings you guys are using on this controller? I am set
for 58, gain 15. Limiter set for 15.9 psi with a 7 for boost reduction if
limit is hit.

What is a safe boost to acheive with a 94 twin turbo, gutted cats, highflow
main cat, downpipe, y-pipe, HKS DLI ignition, K&N filter charger, BLITZ Dual
SBC-i  and NGK plugs?








***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:14:51 -0500
From: "Berrios, Victor L  CIV" <VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil>
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i

Hi Scott:
I believe is your car is stock (pistons, fuel pump, regular fuel, No
alki/water, injectors, etc.), 15.9 in your channel 4 is kind of risky,
considering spiking and overboosting on the unit (and the very famous now
KNOCK!).
I rather play on the safe side (14.X), until an upgrade on the stock items.

Someone enlight us more on this. Thanks

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4
 

- -----Original Message-----
From: Payne, Scott [mailto:SPayne@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 5:56 PM
To: 'Berrios, Victor L CIV'; 'tEAM3S@STEALTH-3000GT.ST'
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


channel 1 =48
channel 2 =53
channel 3 =58
channel 4=auto 15.9
gain is 15 on all channels

- -----Original Message-----
From: Berrios, Victor L CIV [mailto:VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:44 PM
To: 'tEAM3S@STEALTH-3000GT.ST'
Subject: RE: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


Hi:
This unit has four channels. My fourth channel is set as follows:

Boost 14.7 PSI
Gain 25
Limiter 14.7, boost reduction limit 2.

I think 58 is kind of low (~8-9 PSI). Experts help me here.

Did you have it in the "auto" or "manual" mode?

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Payne, Scott [mailto:SPayne@hunton.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Team3S (E-mail)
Subject: Team3S: BLITZ Dual SBC-i


Was wondering what settings you guys are using on this controller? I am set
for 58, gain 15. Limiter set for 15.9 psi with a 7 for boost reduction if
limit is hit.

What is a safe boost to acheive with a 94 twin turbo, gutted cats, highflow
main cat, downpipe, y-pipe, HKS DLI ignition, K&N filter charger, BLITZ Dual
SBC-i  and NGK plugs?








***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:39:18 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

I do have it installed. The sensor is in the rear water plug but this is
exactly what I think is not good.

I tried to adjust it with the datalogger but was not yet successful in doing
that. At the moment (car is not properly running) it is not useful but for
tuning without the datalogger it should help.

Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
To: "'Berrios, Victor L CIV'" <VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil>;
<team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:54 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?


> > Hi Matt:
> > Where did you get it from? Price?
>
> Jeg's High Performance...
>
>
http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/ProductDisplay?prrfnbr=26719&prmenbr=
> 76
>
> Part number 121-8964
>
> $143.00.
>
> -Matt
> '95 3000GT Spyder VR4
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:47:36 -0600
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

Hi Victor,

After Matt mentioned it, I found it also at Summit Racing
http://www.summitracing.com

Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berrios, Victor L  CIV [SMTP:VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: 'team3s@stealth-3000gt.st'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?
>
> Hi Matt:
> Where did you get it from? Price?
>
> Victor
> '96 Pearl White VR-4, Searching for knock alert
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jannusch, Matt [mailto:mjannusch@marketwatch.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?
>
>
> > Since I can't go directly into the ECU since I have
> > pre-OBDII, does anyone know if the MSD Knock Alert sensor
> > will work on a 1995 VR4?  I'm not sure if it taps into
> > the ECU or not.
>
> It uses its own knock sensor that you have to screw into the block..  I've
> got one, but it isn't on the car yet.  I'll report my experiences once the
> car gets back on the road.
>
> -Matt
> '95 3000GT Spyder VR4
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:49:20 -0600
From: overclck@ies.net (Cody Graham)
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braided brake lines

Why don't ya contact Geoff Mohler and get a good deal on Porterfield SS
lines...

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Willis, Charles E.
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:53 AM
To: 'Michael Gerhard'; Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braided brake lines

Just bought some Russell brake lines for my boss' 1969 351 Mustang Mach
I
(part of the "Ultimate Suck-up Crhistmas Package"). They appear to be
the
same construction as the Goodridge brake lines we have on three VR4's.

Try Goodridge.

Chuck Willis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Gerhard [SMTP:gerhard1@llnl.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
> Subject: Team3S: Braided brake lines
>
> I'm trying to buy stainless steel braided brakes lines for my '91
3000GT
> VR4 and am told by Auto Options Salon that there is a very long wait
for
> SMC brakes lines. They have been able to locate another supplier that
can
> offer Russell brake lines.
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has heard of Russell and if they have any
comments
>
> or experience.
>
> Auto Options Salon says they could get Russell brake lines in a week.
>
> Thanks for any input you can provide.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael A. Gerhard     1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4  Pearl White
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:46:03 -0500
From: "Berrios, Victor L  CIV" <VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil>
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?

Thanks Dave/Roger:
How difficult is to install it? Where?

Victor
'96 Pearl White VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Black, Dave (ICT) [mailto:dblai@allstate.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 6:48 PM
To: 'Berrios, Victor L CIV'
Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?


Hi Victor,

After Matt mentioned it, I found it also at Summit Racing
http://www.summitracing.com

Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Berrios, Victor L  CIV [SMTP:VLBerrios@rroads.med.navy.mil]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 12:45 PM
> To: 'team3s@stealth-3000gt.st'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?
>
> Hi Matt:
> Where did you get it from? Price?
>
> Victor
> '96 Pearl White VR-4, Searching for knock alert
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jannusch, Matt [mailto:mjannusch@marketwatch.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:43 PM
> To: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Team3S: MSD Knock Alert?
>
>
> > Since I can't go directly into the ECU since I have
> > pre-OBDII, does anyone know if the MSD Knock Alert sensor
> > will work on a 1995 VR4?  I'm not sure if it taps into
> > the ECU or not.
>
> It uses its own knock sensor that you have to screw into the block..  I've
> got one, but it isn't on the car yet.  I'll report my experiences once the
> car gets back on the road.
>
> -Matt
> '95 3000GT Spyder VR4
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:57:48 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Running Rich

I've written a book? :)

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Running Rich

<Blathering snipped>

Yes, do so ! Afterwards write your own book like Jeffrey does.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:53:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Running Rich

The spent exhaust gas is mostly inert (for combustion purposes) and
will tend to "absorb" heat in the combustion chamber (assuming it is
still in there after it should not be). This is why we can
recirculate exhaust gas in the EGR system without upsetting the A/F.
The EGR serves to reduce combustion temps and so reduce NOx
production (note the EGR occurs when vacuum is in the plenum). The
temp reduction may also reduce tendency for detonation.

Rich? Lean? The exhaust gas is nearly inert and will not burn. But if
the exh gas is a result of a normal WOT situation, then it is the
result of a "rich"-burn and should contain no oxygen. The fresh
charge entering the chamber should be at the correct mixture (as
determined by the ECM). The presence of the inert exh gas in the
chamber should not change the A/F one way or another. But considering
that there may be some small amount of unexpected (by the ECM) "fuel"
left in the exh gas, and no oxygen, the mixture should tend to be a
little "richer" not "leaner", though it should be neither.

The main consequence of exhaust gas reversion is a reduction in
volumetric efficiency of the engine, that is, the volume of fresh
charge entering the combustion chamber is less than the displacement
and less even than it would be under "normal" situations ("normal"
meaning the natural consequences of throttling and head design).

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
To: <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:53 AM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Running Rich


[Willis, Charles E.]  Hard to say which of these is correct - the
partly combusted gasses will indeed contain some unburned fuel, and
little or no oxygen, but the concentration of unburned fuel in the
exhaust gasses will certainly be at a lower concentration than the
fuel concentration in the incoming fuel-air mixture.  The resulting
mixture in the chamber will be "richer" than the incoming fuel-air
stream, that is more unburned fuel-to-oxygen ratio than intended.

I think Jeff is right if all the oygen is indeed consumed in the
previous combustin cycle.
 
> > 3) ".. the gases cannot go out of the combustion chamber and will
be
> > burst again in the next cycle ... causing a lean situation".
> > What? When running rich, all oxygen should be consumed and there
> > should be left over fuel. The phenomenon Roger refers to is
called
> > exhaust gas reversion, where some of the spent fuel-air mixture
> > cannot leave the combustion chamber or is drawn back in to it,
and so
> > prevents the chamber from filling completely with fresh charge.
>
> Same what I said only more words.
>
> > The result of course in this case will be extra "fuel" in the
chamber,
> > not a "lean" situation (extra oxygen).
>
> Aha, so you are saying that when the chamber cannot be filled that
then
> there is too much fuel ? But we do not have direct injection cars
and a
> mixture will enter the chamber. If it cannot enter so why can then
the
> mixture be rich ? This is what causes a temprarily lean situation
in one
> or
> more cycles in one or more cylinders.
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:04:45 -0600
From: "Alex Pedenko" <apedenko@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Wheels/Tires

Would you be interested in selling those to me?

If so, please let me know ASAP and please include some info (tire type/size
tread remaining, etc.)

Thanks,

    Alex.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <Flash95vr4@aol.com>
To: <apedenko@attbi.com>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Wheels/Tires


> The first owner (5 years) was from NY where they use salt.  They use a
good
> bit here in PA too and I used the ones on the car for last winter (6th
year)
> then bought these extra wheels from Rich "Old Poop" Merritt on the list
and
> have had them for a year now.
>
> The extra wheels are for doing Driver's Ed events on open tracks (Watkins
> Glen, Mid-Ohio, Lime Rock, etc.) and make it easy to switch to winter
tires
> since it is just jack the car up and swap wheels.
>
> I bought them for $500 and would love to sell them for more but not many
> people will offer too much more since I won't be able to replace them for
the
> same price (I need beefy wheels that hold up to a 2G loading from 3,000
> pounds of car compressing after a bump on a track when doing 120 mph ... I
> don't want a wheel to break at that point on the track).
>
> --Flash!




***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:01:18 -0500
From: "Zobel, Kurt" <KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole

Check these guys, they may have a deal if they're close to you.
http://www.fixrim.com/

I had found a place in ontario,ca offering VR4 replacement rims, rechromed, for $200.
Can't find it now, but it would only be $50-$75 more if a core charge applied, ie they could not use your old wheel. 

Kurt

- -----Original Message-----
From: Alex Pedenko [mailto:apedenko@attbi.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Black, Dave (ICT)
Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole


I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I was
told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be able
to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would turn
black.

    Any ideas?

    Thanks,

    Alex

'95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole


> Hi Alex,
>
> You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it was
bad
> enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago area!
> I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided to
> replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had fixed.
I
> got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.  They
> were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per wheel).
> These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies go
> for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
>
> The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black from
3Si
> sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
>
> Dave 95VR4
> http://www.daveblack.net
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > To: 'Team3S'
> > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> >
> > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
for?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >     Alex
> >
> > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> >
> >
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***



***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:18:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole

Ive used fixrim..and its also a heat applied method..not too much to
damage my OEM coated wheels, but there is some heat involved.

Im a very happy customer of thiers...and if you do a lotta road race work,
you become a regular customer.

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Zobel, Kurt wrote:

> Check these guys, they may have a deal if they're close to you.
> http://www.fixrim.com/
>
> I had found a place in ontario,ca offering VR4 replacement rims, rechromed, for $200.
> Can't find it now, but it would only be $50-$75 more if a core charge applied, ie they could not use your old wheel. 
>
> Kurt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Pedenko [mailto:apedenko@attbi.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: Black, Dave (ICT)
> Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I was
> told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be able
> to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would turn
> black.
>
>     Any ideas?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
> '95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
> To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it was
> bad
> > enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago area!
> > I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided to
> > replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had fixed.
> I
> > got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.  They
> > were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per wheel).
> > These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies go
> > for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> > impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
> >
> > The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black from
> 3Si
> > sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
> >
> > Dave 95VR4
> > http://www.daveblack.net
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > > To: 'Team3S'
> > > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
> for?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >     Alex
> > >
> > > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>

- ---
Geoff Mohler


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:53:06 -0800
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

Thanks for all the info, everybody - I've certainly learned a few things
from this thread.   I hope they're the correct things though :-)

One follow-up question:

If detonation is what we're trying to avoid (either in and of itself or
because it leads to pre-ignition), then do you think that using smaller
spark plug gaps would contribute to this?

I often hear of people running high boost reducing their gaps from the stock
0.039"-0.043" down as low as 0.028" to combat spark "blow-out" at high
boost.  If a "smaller" spark can cause incomplete (or irregular?) combustion
events, then could the reduced spark plug gap be increasing the engine's
tendency to detonate (knock)?

- --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:26:10 -0600
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole

I live in Houston and didn't have a good experience with the local store.
They were real snotty about the remote possibility of repairing my dented
chrome wheel and that was sight unseen.  The flat rate price to fix aluminum
wheels is good, but the "cost plus" pricing on the chrome wheels is a little
scary.  Also they were rude about the possibility of any inhouse stock of
refurbished VR4 wheels ("Huh, lots o' luck!  I used to have some of those,
but haven't seen them for years".)

I hope this is an anomaly.  My "tire bitch" has a good relationship with
them and the stores have a good reputation.  I wound up driving down to
Clear Lake/Friendswood to get my wheel repaired.

Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zobel, Kurt [SMTP:KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
> To: Alex Pedenko
> Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
>
> Check these guys, they may have a deal if they're close to you.
> http://www.fixrim.com/
>
> I had found a place in ontario,ca offering VR4 replacement rims,
> rechromed, for $200.
> Can't find it now, but it would only be $50-$75 more if a core charge
> applied, ie they could not use your old wheel. 
>
> Kurt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Pedenko [mailto:apedenko@attbi.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: Black, Dave (ICT)
> Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I
> was
> told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be able
> to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would turn
> black.
>
>     Any ideas?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
> '95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
> To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it was
> bad
> > enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago
> area!
> > I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided to
> > replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had fixed.
> I
> > got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.
> They
> > were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per
> wheel).
> > These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies
> go
> > for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> > impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
> >
> > The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black from
> 3Si
> > sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
> >
> > Dave 95VR4
> > http://www.daveblack.net
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > > To: 'Team3S'
> > > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
> for?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >     Alex
> > >
> > > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:29:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

No, a smaller gap wont detonate (or cause it I should say) because
detonation it a hot spot (or just too hot of an intake charge).

Now, a plug with the wrong heat range can cause it, because its running
too hot.

On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Gross, Erik wrote:

> Thanks for all the info, everybody - I've certainly learned a few things
> from this thread.   I hope they're the correct things though :-)
>
> One follow-up question:
>
> If detonation is what we're trying to avoid (either in and of itself or
> because it leads to pre-ignition), then do you think that using smaller
> spark plug gaps would contribute to this?
>
> I often hear of people running high boost reducing their gaps from the stock
> 0.039"-0.043" down as low as 0.028" to combat spark "blow-out" at high
> boost.  If a "smaller" spark can cause incomplete (or irregular?) combustion
> events, then could the reduced spark plug gap be increasing the engine's
> tendency to detonate (knock)?
>
> --Erik
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>

- ---
Geoff Mohler


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:55:25 -0600
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

On a followup note, are there plugs other than stock NGK Platinum that
should be used?  Are the stock NGK's cold enough for high-boost
applications?

Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoff Mohler [SMTP:gemohler@www.speedtoys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:30 PM
> To: Gross, Erik
> Cc: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)
>
> No, a smaller gap wont detonate (or cause it I should say) because
> detonation it a hot spot (or just too hot of an intake charge).
>
> Now, a plug with the wrong heat range can cause it, because its running
> too hot.
>
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Gross, Erik wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all the info, everybody - I've certainly learned a few things
> > from this thread.   I hope they're the correct things though :-)
> >
> > One follow-up question:
> >
> > If detonation is what we're trying to avoid (either in and of itself or
> > because it leads to pre-ignition), then do you think that using smaller
> > spark plug gaps would contribute to this?
> >
> > I often hear of people running high boost reducing their gaps from the
> stock
> > 0.039"-0.043" down as low as 0.028" to combat spark "blow-out" at high
> > boost.  If a "smaller" spark can cause incomplete (or irregular?)
> combustion
> > events, then could the reduced spark plug gap be increasing the engine's
> > tendency to detonate (knock)?
> >
> > --Erik
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
>
> ---
> Geoff Mohler
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:45:50 -0800
From: "Jamie Marzonie" <jsmarzonie@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

Smaller gap = less resistence = less of a chance for detonation.  Running
the stock 0.044 gap is too large, as well as plat plugs. Plat plugs are ONLY
used so you don't have to tear off the intake plenum and runners as often. 
Run some ngk V power, the ones for a 3g64 turbo work well, I'd go a range or
two colder though.  I'm setting the gap to ~0.038.. maybe 0.035...  turbo
will cause your gap to widen over time.

Jamie... OUT-


>From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
>To: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
>CC: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st
>Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)
>Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:29:49 -0800 (PST)
>
>No, a smaller gap wont detonate (or cause it I should say) because
>detonation it a hot spot (or just too hot of an intake charge).
>
>Now, a plug with the wrong heat range can cause it, because its running
>too hot.
>
>On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Gross, Erik wrote:
>
> > Thanks for all the info, everybody - I've certainly learned a few things
> > from this thread.   I hope they're the correct things though :-)
> >
> > One follow-up question:
> >
> > If detonation is what we're trying to avoid (either in and of itself or
> > because it leads to pre-ignition), then do you think that using smaller
> > spark plug gaps would contribute to this?
> >
> > I often hear of people running high boost reducing their gaps from the
>stock
> > 0.039"-0.043" down as low as 0.028" to combat spark "blow-out" at high
> > boost.  If a "smaller" spark can cause incomplete (or irregular?)
>combustion
> > events, then could the reduced spark plug gap be increasing the engine's
> > tendency to detonate (knock)?
> >
> > --Erik
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
>
>---
>Geoff Mohler
>
>
>***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:22:14 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

> On a followup note, are there plugs other than stock NGK
> Platinum that should be used?  Are the stock NGK's cold
> enough for high-boost applications?

The stock NGK's are too hot for high-boost applications and are probably
contributing to all the knock that we see at boost levels higher than 15psi.
How much of the knock it might be causing needs to be researched, but in
general for every 100 HP increase over stock you should go one range colder.

I'm switching to copper NGK's 2 ranges colder than stock.  I'll have to
report my experience with them after the car gets reassembled.  They'll need
to be changed probably every 12-15,000 miles but it isn't that difficult
after you've done it a couple times.  If you choose a range that's too cold
then the plugs might foul if you don't drive hard enough (ie: spend a lot of
time idling in heavy traffic).  We'll have to experiment to find a happy
medium for the plug temperatures, and each car will probably be a little
different.

On a happy note - my rods are done.  Reassmbly should commence this weekend.
:-)

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:28:49 -0800
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

> Smaller gap = less resistence = less of a chance for
> detonation. 

I'm not sure I understand - can you elaborate?  I get that a smaller gap
means less resistance and that you have a more reliable spark (especially
when air density increases), but how does this reduce the chance of
detonation?


> Running the stock 0.044 gap is too large,

Why do I hear this so often as a blanket statement?  Even if you add "for
running XX psi" to the end of the sentence, it's still dependent on your
ignition and ambient conditions (temp, pressure).  And I'm pretty sure that
the value of "XX" is above 16 for most conditions. 

Maybe I'll pull my plugs before I have to replace them and check the gaps...
AFAIK, they're the original plugs with 37,XXX miles on them and I run up to
14psi on a regular basis.  I've briefly run up to 16psi (NOT intentionally)
and never, NEVER, ever had spark blow out.  Even on a cold, humid, rainy PNW
night going up a loooong hill with it floored in 4th gear from around
3000RPM to 6000RPM.  What gives?  I'm really curious to see if I get any
spark blow-out when I get my WI system installed and tuned...  maybe I'll
have to chew some words then and close my gaps....  but hopefully I won't
:-)

- --Erik
'95 VR-4 (BPU+)

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:04:45 -0500
From: "WALTER D. BEST" <WDBO39@erols.com>
Subject: Team3S: Polished and powder spark plug plates

Just wanted to let you all know that I have received my complete shipment of
spark plug plates today.  If anyone is interested, in picking up a polished
plate with powder coated letters, in about any color you would like please
let me know.

The plates are etched with Twin Turbo, GTO both with and without the
Mitsubishi diamonds, 3000GT, with and without the Mitsubishi diamond (one
diamond) and Stealth.  I currently have two on ebay now.

Blue Stealth plate:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=599709988&
r=0&t=0&showTutorial=0&ed=1010284152&indexURL=0&rd=1

Red 3000GT plate:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=599710854&
r=0&t=0&showTutorial=0&ed=1010285225&indexURL=0&rd=1

If you guys are interested don't worry about bidding just come to me
directly.  I sell them for $60, shipping runs around $4 in the US, again
done in any color you like.

I'll have a Stealth plate and a GTO (without diamonds) both done in red on
ebay this next week if you like to take a look.

I polish/powder coat plenums and valve covers, if interested let me know and
I can send you some picutres of my work.

Thanks guys just want to make sure you knew you could get these with out
bidding, and save some $.

Dave Best








***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:05:14 -0600
From: "Alex Pedenko" <apedenko@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole

Thanks for everybody's suggestions.

    I went to the place out in Chicago (trans wheel) and had a similar
experience. The guy took one look at the wheel, cringed and said that there
is nothing he can do - the wheel will crack if he tries anything. As far as
replacements go, he told me that new, the 18" chrome costs ~700 and he gets
2, maybe 3 per year so "tough luck"

I'm gonna take some pics and throw them up on the web, see what ppl say.

Thanks,

    Alex

'95 VR4

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
To: "'Zobel, Kurt'" <KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com>; "Alex Pedenko" <apedenko@attbi.com>
Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole


> I live in Houston and didn't have a good experience with the local store.
> They were real snotty about the remote possibility of repairing my dented
> chrome wheel and that was sight unseen.  The flat rate price to fix
aluminum
> wheels is good, but the "cost plus" pricing on the chrome wheels is a
little
> scary.  Also they were rude about the possibility of any inhouse stock of
> refurbished VR4 wheels ("Huh, lots o' luck!  I used to have some of those,
> but haven't seen them for years".)
>
> I hope this is an anomaly.  My "tire bitch" has a good relationship with
> them and the stores have a good reputation.  I wound up driving down to
> Clear Lake/Friendswood to get my wheel repaired.
>
> Chuck
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zobel, Kurt [SMTP:KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
> > To: Alex Pedenko
> > Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
> >
> > Check these guys, they may have a deal if they're close to you.
> > http://www.fixrim.com/
> >
> > I had found a place in ontario,ca offering VR4 replacement rims,
> > rechromed, for $200.
> > Can't find it now, but it would only be $50-$75 more if a core charge
> > applied, ie they could not use your old wheel.
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alex Pedenko [mailto:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:20 PM
> > To: Black, Dave (ICT)
> > Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> > Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole
> >
> >
> > I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I
> > was
> > told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be
able
> > to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would
turn
> > black.
> >
> >     Any ideas?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >
> >     Alex
> >
> > '95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
> > To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> > Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
> > Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
> >
> >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it
was
> > bad
> > > enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago
> > area!
> > > I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided
to
> > > replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had
fixed.
> > I
> > > got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.
> > They
> > > were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per
> > wheel).
> > > These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies
> > go
> > > for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> > > impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
> > >
> > > The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black
from
> > 3Si
> > > sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
> > >
> > > Dave 95VR4
> > > http://www.daveblack.net
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > > > To: 'Team3S'
> > > > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> > > >
> > > > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > > > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > > > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
> > for?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >     Alex
> > > >
> > > > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> >
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***



***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 16:59:57 -0600
From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)

Matt,

Then what would the appropriate plug gaps be for the colder plugs?  Do you
have the part numbers for the copper plugs?

Thanks!

Dave 95VR4
http://www.daveblack.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jannusch, Matt [SMTP:mjannusch@marketwatch.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: Team3s (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Knock, detonation, pre-ignition (kinda long)
>
> > On a followup note, are there plugs other than stock NGK
> > Platinum that should be used?  Are the stock NGK's cold
> > enough for high-boost applications?
>
> The stock NGK's are too hot for high-boost applications and are probably
> contributing to all the knock that we see at boost levels higher than
> 15psi.
> How much of the knock it might be causing needs to be researched, but in
> general for every 100 HP increase over stock you should go one range
> colder.
>
> I'm switching to copper NGK's 2 ranges colder than stock.  I'll have to
> report my experience with them after the car gets reassembled.  They'll
> need
> to be changed probably every 12-15,000 miles but it isn't that difficult
> after you've done it a couple times.  If you choose a range that's too
> cold
> then the plugs might foul if you don't drive hard enough (ie: spend a lot
> of
> time idling in heavy traffic).  We'll have to experiment to find a happy
> medium for the plug temperatures, and each car will probably be a little
> different.
>
> On a happy note - my rods are done.  Reassmbly should commence this
> weekend.
> :-)
>
> -Matt
> '95 3000GT Spyder VR4
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:01:52 -0600
From: "xwing" <xwing@wi.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's

I told Jason Siebels, now at AEM responsible for the "AEM Computer", way
back in 3 or 4/2000 that there were 3 main ECU versions of 3000GTVR4--91-93
OBDI, 94-95 OBDI with OBDII harness, and 96+ OBDII.  I told him I'd need a
version for my 93, and a different one with proper pinout adjustments for my
94.

They are NOT the same; most are same but there are changes, which is why
even the relatively SIMPLE HKS VPC needed wiring change to work at all on
the 94.  If they aren't making different versions for the different years,
they just don't care enough to do the job right and will wait for complaints
before "looking into it".  I hope they WILL have the proper versions from
the get-go, maybe they are working on that now.
Since the computer was supposed to come out in December/January (you know,
THIS MONTH) let's see just what comes out when.
I sure hope it comes out and works properly someday; it has looked great fpr
over 2 years now...

Gumball Rally, re: Jag that wouldn't start:
"It's an elegant design."  "Yeah.  I only wish it RAN."

From: "Roger Gerl" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002
Subject: Re: Team3S: Aftermarket ECU's
> I can't wait for the first experiences.... buy it, install it and ...
report please ;-)
>  AEM said that there is only one harness for all years ... interesting. I
> emailed them again with the question regarding OBDII having troubles with
a
> non-existing stock ECU and non-responding sub-devices. No answer
> anymore.....
> Gooood luck for the guinea-pig
> Roger

> From: "Todd D.Shelton" <tds@brightok.net>
> > From: Jannusch, Matt <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
> > To: team3s@stealth-3000gt.st <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
> > Date: Wednesday, January 02, 2002
> > >The PMS says it works on all years also - and it does!  You just tell
them
> > >what year car you have and they send the right cables along.  Probably
> > >something similar with the AEM.  At least you'd hope so.

> > I hope so too since they (AEM) lists the part # as :
> > 3000GT VR4  1992-00  30-1311
> > They also say:
> > This user-programmable system plugs directly into a vehicle's factory
> >  ECU harness and requires no additional wiring.
> > Something doesn't add up.  Not only are the plugs different
> > but the wires/numbering don't match up exactly from 1st to
> > 2nd generation.  Even when connecting something as "simple"
> > as an ITC - you have to access a different wiring diagram depending
> > on year and whether it is a US model or not.
> > More for those that are interested:
> > The AEM EMS's infinitely-adjustable software allows tuners to program
> >  virtually any combination of engine control, power adders and auxiliary
> > devices, and accurately deliver proper amounts of fuel and correct
> >  ignition timing for ANY boost level or operating condition.
> > Plug & Play Programmable Engine Management System
> > Plug & Play Technology - No additional wiring necessary
> > Installs in minutes!
> > Runs on Windows™ Based Software
> > 16/32 Hybrid High-Speed Processor
> > Base Maps included
> > Onboard datalogging
> > Sequential Fuel Injection
> > Interactive, User-friendly Manual
> > Nitrous, Boost and Knock control
> > Forced induction compatible
> > They also sell a 2nd version called:
> > The AEM Race Programmable Engine Management System
> > And it lists:
> > User configurable Windows™ software (requires a minimum Pentium 100 PC
> > Comes with complete library of tuning tips and system design
> > User programmable inputs and outputs*
> > Up to 10 cylinder sequential fuel injection with individual cylinder
trim
> > Up to 10 cylinder wasted spark distributor less ignition with individual
> > cylinder trim
> > Twin O2 sensor closed loop control (Wide range, and UEGO)
> > Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT) feedback
> > Idle motor control
> > Extensive Electronic Automatic
> > transmission control
> > Interactive User Friendly manual
> > Twin Knock sensing control
> > Requires Wiring of Vehicle
> > I can't hardly keep track of everything I'm monitoring/setting up now!
> > Imagine all that .....
> > - tds



***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:11:14 -0800
From: "Jim Berry" <fastmax@home.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole

Alex

I have an extra set of 94 VR-4 rims for sale --- condition varies from very good
to OK at 15 feet. They currently have a set of worn A032's on them that I was
going to remove. The tires probably have one good weekend of open track left
in them.

        Jim Berry
=================================================

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Pedenko <apedenko@attbi.com>
To: Willis, Charles E. <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>; 'Zobel, Kurt' <KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com>
Cc: Team3s (E-mail) <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole


> Thanks for everybody's suggestions.
>
>     I went to the place out in Chicago (trans wheel) and had a similar
> experience. The guy took one look at the wheel, cringed and said that there
> is nothing he can do - the wheel will crack if he tries anything. As far as
> replacements go, he told me that new, the 18" chrome costs ~700 and he gets
> 2, maybe 3 per year so "tough luck"
>
> I'm gonna take some pics and throw them up on the web, see what ppl say.
>
> Thanks,
>
>     Alex
>
> '95 VR4
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
> To: "'Zobel, Kurt'" <KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com>; "Alex Pedenko" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
>
>
> > I live in Houston and didn't have a good experience with the local store.
> > They were real snotty about the remote possibility of repairing my dented
> > chrome wheel and that was sight unseen.  The flat rate price to fix
> aluminum
> > wheels is good, but the "cost plus" pricing on the chrome wheels is a
> little
> > scary.  Also they were rude about the possibility of any inhouse stock of
> > refurbished VR4 wheels ("Huh, lots o' luck!  I used to have some of those,
> > but haven't seen them for years".)
> >
> > I hope this is an anomaly.  My "tire bitch" has a good relationship with
> > them and the stores have a good reputation.  I wound up driving down to
> > Clear Lake/Friendswood to get my wheel repaired.
> >
> > Chuck
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Zobel, Kurt [SMTP:KURT.ZOBEL@ca.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:01 PM
> > > To: Alex Pedenko
> > > Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> > > Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > > Check these guys, they may have a deal if they're close to you.
> > > http://www.fixrim.com/
> > >
> > > I had found a place in ontario,ca offering VR4 replacement rims,
> > > rechromed, for $200.
> > > Can't find it now, but it would only be $50-$75 more if a core charge
> > > applied, ie they could not use your old wheel.
> > >
> > > Kurt
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alex Pedenko [mailto:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 1:20 PM
> > > To: Black, Dave (ICT)
> > > Cc: Team3s (E-mail)
> > > Subject: Re: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > >
> > > I called that twice, and both time got a different answer - first time I
> > > was
> > > told that they could do it. Second time I was told that they would be
> able
> > > to do it, but since they use heat to straighten it, the chrome would
> turn
> > > black.
> > >
> > >     Any ideas?
> > >
> > >     Thanks,
> > >
> > >     Alex
> > >
> > > '95 Vr4 w/ a chrome pain in the *ss
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Black, Dave (ICT)" <dblai@allstate.com>
> > > To: "'Alex Pedenko'" <apedenko@attbi.com>
> > > Cc: "Team3s (E-mail)" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
> > > Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 9:43 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Team3S: Pothole
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > You may now have some wheel vibration and possibly a rim leak if it
> was
> > > bad
> > > > enough.  I have had this happen many times.....living in the Chicago
> > > area!
> > > > I have had 2 rim leaks on 2 different wheels.  One of which I decided
> to
> > > > replace with a restored OEM 18" chromie wheel and the other I had
> fixed.
> > > I
> > > > got a restored wheel from a place called TransWheel for about $350.
> > > They
> > > > were also the ones that straightened out my other wheels ($100 per
> > > wheel).
> > > > These were pretty cheap prices considering that the stock 18" chromies
> > > go
> > > > for about $561 from Tallahassee Mitsu.  The restored ones are next to
> > > > impossible to tell from brand new so why pay the extra money?
> > > >
> > > > The number is 1-800-892-3733.  Ask for Tom and tell him Dave Black
> from
> > > 3Si
> > > > sent you.  The website is http://www.transwheel.com
> > > >
> > > > Dave 95VR4
> > > > http://www.daveblack.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Alex Pedenko [SMTP:apedenko@attbi.com]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 4:00 PM
> > > > > To: 'Team3S'
> > > > > Subject: Team3S: Pothole
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, I hit a pothole that dented my chrome 18" rims :'( ...
> > > > > The dent is about an inch deep towards the center of the wheel. Tire
> > > > > pressure seems to be holding okay. Anything I should check/watch out
> > > for?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > >     Alex
> > > > >
> > > > > '95 VR4 (with a limp)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> > > >
> > > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> > >
> > > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

End of Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth V1 #716
***************************************