Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth   Tuesday, October 23 2001   Volume 01 : Number 654




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:29:13 -0400
From: "Jeff VanOrsdal" <jeffv@1nce.com>
Subject: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

Does anyone make an adapter bracket to fit 996 calipers in place of the
stock TT calipers?  I may be able to get a good deal on a pair of them, but
I want to know if I can make them fit before I go to the expense.  Are there
any other things I would need to look out for?  Thanks.

Jeff VanOrsdal
1991 Stealth ESX Twin Turbo
jeffv@1nce.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:34:33 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

Aren't these the same that Bedell sells?  Or are those the 993 model?

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 with Brad's Big Red Brake Kit

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Jeff VanOrsdal
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:29
To: Team3s Tech List
Subject: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

Does anyone make an adapter bracket to fit 996 calipers in place of the
stock TT calipers?  I may be able to get a good deal on a pair of them,
but
I want to know if I can make them fit before I go to the expense.  Are
there
any other things I would need to look out for?  Thanks.

Jeff VanOrsdal
1991 Stealth ESX Twin Turbo
jeffv@1nce.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:23:52 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

At 10:40 AM 10/23/01 -0400, Darren Schilberg wrote:
>And I shouldn't comment how at Kansas Rich was doing his water spraying
>magic and not going 5 seconds faster than us ... should I?

Water spraying does not make me go faster. It keeps the pads from fading.
I'm not sure if it was the water spraying, but I could  outbrake both Mike
and Chuck, which was the only way I could keep up with them.  I had some
problems at HP, first with the Ford fluid boiling on Saturday. We  replaced
the Ford fluid with Motul, which helped a great deal. Then, when the brakes
were finally working great, I corded my Kuhmos on Sunday and ran the last
session on street tires. All in all, not a great weekend for setting fast
times.

 I think he
>was the fastest because there was human timing and only clocked him at
>most 0.5 second faster in the 7 sessions we timed. Just trying to add some
substance.  I know Heartland Park is not Road
>Atlanta.  And I know Rich was following Chuck's line to learn it more so
>I don't know if we ever saw Rich break out and have a best lap since he
>was doing more learning. Rich?  How much faster you think you coulda gone
without someone in
>front to slow you down?

I have gone 2 seconds a lap faster under different conditions -- colder and
on a new set of Kuhmos. Nevertheless, nobody was slowing me down that day.
It was all I could do to keep up with Chuck and Mike. They would pull away
with their boost controllers, and I'd catch up under braking, and we were
even through the corners. I learned a lot that day just comparing notes,
following Mike and Chuck, riding with Chuck, working with you on brake
fluid and swapping pads, and all that stuff. First time I ever ran with
another VR4. Much better than running alone.

If I had a boost controller, I'd smoke both of them. OTOH, if they had
better brakes, they'd smoke me. Maybe next time we'll all have improved
cars, all go two seconds a lap faster, and still lap nose to tail. I'd like
that.

Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:39:35 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Handbrake turns

I SAID GENERALLY, MATT.

How many AutoX their AWD car and do it well?  I know of one ... well ...
two now.  You and Scott White in Rochester, NY.

And if you are doing that well against the modded Porsches then those
drivers suck.  I can't even beat a 1976 911 with only stiffer anti-sway
bars and street tires.  Maybe we just have better people around here.
We do have the 2000 Street Mod National Champ (Kent Rafferty) race with
us.  I have inherited a host of tires from him.

Our biggest classes are G stock, H stock, C stock and the prepared
classes of those as well (Neons, Integras, Civics, CRXes, Sentras,
etc.).  Not many in A stock (last year's 3/S cars) or F stock (this
year's 3/S cars) and not too many Camaro, Mustang, or Trans Am either.
The courses are set up for small cars when Corvette AutoXes (I've not
been to one) are set up for large cars.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jannusch, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:18
 
> Just remember that our cars generally are not good at AutoX. 

I beg to differ.  ;-)  My times are very close to the modified Porsches
in
my class (A-Prepared) with my car on stock suspension and street tires
where
they are on full-out race rubber and have completely redone suspension
and
the whole works.  3/S cars can be competitive just as any other car can
be...  AutoX is 90% driver.

...and my friend took the season trophy in the entire Stock Street Tire
class with his completely bone-stock 1991 3000GT VR4 against all sorts
of
Integras, Probes, VW's, Neons, etc.

Go figure.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:55:52 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

Yes.  Track time with OTHER 3/S cars is the only way.  I am jealous
there will be so many at Sears Point this weekend.  Hopefully others
will start in the Northeast or Midwest for us to drive with.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Merritt [mailto:merritt@cedar-rapids.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:24
 
I have gone 2 seconds a lap faster under different conditions -- colder
and
on a new set of Kuhmos. Nevertheless, nobody was slowing me down that
day.
It was all I could do to keep up with Chuck and Mike. They would pull
away
with their boost controllers, and I'd catch up under braking, and we
were
even through the corners. I learned a lot that day just comparing notes,
following Mike and Chuck, riding with Chuck, working with you on brake
fluid and swapping pads, and all that stuff. First time I ever ran with
another VR4. Much better than running alone.

If I had a boost controller, I'd smoke both of them. OTOH, if they had
better brakes, they'd smoke me. Maybe next time we'll all have improved
cars, all go two seconds a lap faster, and still lap nose to tail. I'd
like
that.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:06:05 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

So then isn't Brad's transition piece that part Jeff says he has a good
price for?  I'm confused.  Why would you need this if you aren't doing
Big Reds?  And if you are doing Big Reds then Brad's kit comes equipped
with it.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Floyd, Jim [mailto:Jim_Floyd@Maxtor.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:48
To: 'dschilberg@pobox.com'
Cc: 'Brad Bedell'
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters


Big Reds, 993 and 996 all use the same brake pads.

- ---------------------------------------------------------

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:20:34 -0400
From: "Jeff VanOrsdal" <jeffv@1nce.com>
Subject: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

I may be able to get a pair of used 996 calipers at a good deal. This is why
I would not purchase the full kit from Brad.  My problem then is I would
need the hardware alone.  Brackets, hoses, etc.  I'll also need to track
down rotors, but that seems simple enough.  I don't have Brad's email handy
(I'm on a business trip right now) otherwise I wouldn't have bothered the
list with this.

Jeff VanOrsdal
1991 Stealth ESX Twin Turbo
jeffv@1nce.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection effect on compression ratio and combustion chamber volume.

- --- Jim Floyd wrote:
>> I had a local mustang owner with NOS tell me this:
>> 1) Injecting NOS into your engine increases the compression
>> ratio of the combustion chamber while injecting NOS.

The actual (dynamic?) compression ratio (CR) is close to what the
static CR is. The static CR is determined simply as the volume in the
combustion chamber with the piston at BDC (bottom dead center)
divided by the volume in the combustion chamber with the piston at
TDC (top dead center). Adding NOS (nitrous oxide) or using forced
induction does not change this.

However, forced induction does change the *density* of the air
entering the combustion chamber - NOT THE VOLUME. Note that for
convenience only we usually refer to air flow as the amount of
*outside* air that has passed through the turbo or supercharger. The
turbo or supercharger compresses the air and *reduces* the volume to
that which can fit through the engine. Because the air is denser some
people refer to an effective CR. Regardless, the problem with denser
mixtures is that the flame front progresses faster than in less dense
mixtures and so the chances for detonation are increased.

NOS does not change the air density or volume by much. It changes the
relative percentages of components in the air. It increases the
oxygen content. Not denser (well maybe just a little because O is ~16
and N ~14 in the periodic table). No more volume. No change in CR.
BUT, more oxygen requires more fuel, essentially making a denser
mixture in the combustion chamber and so increasing the chance for
knock. The cooling effect of NOS may offset the increased potetntial
for knock; I am not that well versed in NOS.

Spraying NOS into the air (in the intake tube), just like spraying
water into the air, displaces the air. Because water contains no
available oxygen for combustion (at the temps we are talking about)
the amount of oxygen is always reduced as humidity rises. In an open
container such as our intake track, the air does not compress, it
gets pushed aside. NOS is providing a compound with more available
oxygen percentagewise so oxygen availablity increases.

>> 2) Injecting NOS increases the volume of gasoline in the
>> combustion chamber while injecting NOS.

Of course. More oxygen requires more fuel - mass for mass. This is
stating the trivial.

While on this subject, notice that the highest available octane
gasoline at high elevation locations (Colorado for instance) is lower
than the highest octane gas at lower elevations. The air is less
dense up here so the flame front progresses a little slower in the
combustion chamber. Less "octane" is needed. Well, less is needed for
NA cars. Our turbo cars still need the highest octane we can get.

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Floyd, Jim" <Jim_Floyd@Maxtor.com>
To: "'Team 3S'" <Team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 8:52 AM
Subject: Team3S: NOS injection effect on compression ratio and
combustion chamber volume.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:24:56 -0500
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Handbrake turns

> I SAID GENERALLY, MATT.
>
> How many AutoX their AWD car and do it well?  I know of one
> ... well ... two now.  You and Scott White in Rochester, NY.

Dennis Grant does reasonably well at Nationals in his AWD Talon.  Fedja
Jelosovik (sp?) was doing well at Nationals for a few years in the mid 90's
with his Eclipse GSX AWD.  Subaru WRX's are starting to do well also now (at
least on the local events I've seen).

> And if you are doing that well against the modded Porsches
> then those drivers suck.  I can't even beat a 1976 911 with
> only stiffer anti-sway bars and street tires.  Maybe we just
> have better people around here. We do have the 2000 Street
> Mod National Champ (Kent Rafferty) race with us.  I have
> inherited a host of tires from him.

I said the car can be competitive.  Like I said, autocross is 90% driver.
If you are losing, work on the driver.

Geez, give me a little credit that I at least partially know what the hell I
am doing.  Just because you don't know anyone running 3/S cars in autocross
and doing well doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Maybe if I bolted a Big Red kit on my car then I could be a racing expert
too.  Sheesh.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:29:45 +0100
From: "George Shaw" <george.shaw@btinternet.com>
Subject: Team3S: NOS injection

NOS injection, does it work on diesel engines?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:31:48 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

bbedell@austin.rr.com

Good luck.  How much can you get them for?

- - Rotors are stock Porterfield rotors from Mohler (cryo treating at your
request).
- - SS lines from Mohler who had a sale a bit ago or Bedell.
- - Brake fluid from Mohler.
- - Pads from Bedell (Pagid Orange), Carbotech (Panther Plus), or Mohler
(Porterfield).
- - Instructions from my web page
(www.speedtoys.com/~dschilberg/cars/brakes/BigReds_install.html).

Price everything out and see how much you save.  It will cost a bit more
sending all the different items through the mail but I'm still
interested to see how much more you saved.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jeff VanOrsdal
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:21
 
I may be able to get a pair of used 996 calipers at a good deal. This is
why
I would not purchase the full kit from Brad.  My problem then is I would
need the hardware alone.  Brackets, hoses, etc.  I'll also need to track
down rotors, but that seems simple enough.  I don't have Brad's email
handy
(I'm on a business trip right now) otherwise I wouldn't have bothered
the list with this.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:43:39 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Handbrake turns

Okay ... enough slinging Matt.  When I talk about the road racers I know
it is the small minority of us out there (I don't think there are more
than 20-30 who do it regularly throughout the year).  Maybe it is the
same number of AutoXers as well (the AWD guys ... the FWD guys seem to
like drag strips and AutoX equally).

Those guys you mentioned are using the smaller and lighter weight AWD
cars.  I just never see in the standings where our cars are beating the
same technology but lighter cars, that's all.  Maybe I'm looking at the
wrong regions.

By bolting the Big Reds on does not mean I am an expert but I put them
on for use on high-heat and higher speed applications such as a road
course.  My mods are practically useless on an AutoX course:
- -Tires are for higher heat and longer wear applications
- -Rollbar is not required in AutoX or drag racing
- -Race seat DOES help in AutoX
- -Harnesses DO help in AutoX
- -Removing back seat does NOT help in AutoX since it weighs at most 20
pounds
- -Driving shoes are flame retardant and not required in AutoX
- -Driving suit it flame retardant and not required in AutoX
- -Gloves are flame retardant and not required in AutoX
- -K&N FIPK does not help at low speeds as much as high speeds and long
runs under full throttle.

There is definitely a difference in AutoX and road driving.  The only
main similarities I can note are ... well ... you press the brake to
slow down, press the throttle to speed up, turn the wheel to turn.
Other than that the similarity is done other than turns have turn-in
points, apexes, and track out points.  In road course driving you don't
burn a clutch starting on a road course (rolling starts from Pit lane),
you never shift into first gear unless you go off track, you get to
check your mirrors and gauges and interact with other cars on the
course, and you have a professional instructor giving pointers the whole
time.

I did learn tons in AutoX (the fact that the turns come faster, reaction
time is at a peak, etc.) but just prefer to road courses (they show off
the skills of the car better and give you more time to think about the
next turn).  Can't we just leave it at the fact that now that I've done
my AutoX events I prefer road courses?  I've done drag events just to
get a time but now I prefer road courses.  You think Big Reds help me on
the drag strip?  Nope.  Rollbar?  Nope.  I began to setup my car for
nothing but road courses.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 with heavy mods for the road course yet still the daily driver

- -----Original Message-----
From: Jannusch, Matt
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:25
 
Dennis Grant does reasonably well at Nationals in his AWD Talon.  Fedja
Jelosovik (sp?) was doing well at Nationals for a few years in the mid
90's
with his Eclipse GSX AWD.  Subaru WRX's are starting to do well also now
(at
least on the local events I've seen).

I said the car can be competitive.  Like I said, autocross is 90%
driver.
If you are losing, work on the driver.

Geez, give me a little credit that I at least partially know what the
hell I
am doing.  Just because you don't know anyone running 3/S cars in
autocross
and doing well doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Maybe if I bolted a Big Red kit on my car then I could be a racing
expert
too.  Sheesh.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection effect on compression ratio and combustion chamber  volume.

You increase cylinder pressure, nothing you do short of different
pistons/etc will change compression ratio.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Floyd, Jim wrote:
>  I had a local mustang owner with NOS tell me this:
> 1) Injecting NOS into your engine increases the compression ratio of
> the combustion chamber while injecting NOS.
> 2) Injecting NOS increases the volume of gasoline in the combustion
> chamber while injecting NOS.
>     Because you have to increase gas volume during NOS injection.
>
> Is this true ?
- ---
Geoff Mohler

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

FWIW, the adaptors do not reduce the cost of the kit much, its mostly in
the calipers/brakes/lines. 

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Jeff VanOrsdal wrote:

> I may be able to get a pair of used 996 calipers at a good deal. This is why
> I would not purchase the full kit from Brad.  My problem then is I would
> need the hardware alone.  Brackets, hoses, etc.  I'll also need to track
> down rotors, but that seems simple enough.  I don't have Brad's email handy
> (I'm on a business trip right now) otherwise I wouldn't have bothered the
> list with this.
>
> Jeff VanOrsdal
> 1991 Stealth ESX Twin Turbo
> jeffv@1nce.com

Geoff Mohler

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:01:10 -0400
From: "Furman, Russell" <RFurman2@MassMutual.com>
Subject: Team3S: Random ? on Brakes

While we are on the topic of brakes.... Does anyone know if the second gen
rotors/calipers in the REAR are larger than those found on the first gen?  I
am looking at Binder upgrades for the spring...was kicking around going with
the AP Racing 13.5/6 pot upgrade for the front and 2nd Gen binders in the
rear if they are larger.

Thanks Guys/Gals

Russ F
CT

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Random ? on Brakes

They are a different part number 585=1st gen, 786=2nd gen.

I can get sizes if anyone needs to know specifically.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Furman, Russell wrote:

> While we are on the topic of brakes.... Does anyone know if the second gen
> rotors/calipers in the REAR are larger than those found on the first gen?  I
> am looking at Binder upgrades for the spring...was kicking around going with
> the AP Racing 13.5/6 pot upgrade for the front and 2nd Gen binders in the
> rear if they are larger.
>
> Thanks Guys/Gals
>
> Russ F
> CT

Geoff Mohler

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:14:37 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Merritt [SMTP:merritt@cedar-rapids.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:24 AM
> To: dschilberg@pobox.com; 'Team3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water
>
> At 10:40 AM 10/23/01 -0400, Darren Schilberg wrote:
> >And I shouldn't comment how at Kansas Rich was doing his water spraying
> >magic and not going 5 seconds faster than us ... should I?
>
> Water spraying does not make me go faster. It keeps the pads from fading.
> I'm not sure if it was the water spraying, but I could  outbrake both Mike
> and Chuck, which was the only way I could keep up with them.
[Willis, Charles E.] 
Late braking is a standard racing trick for catching up with
anybody.  Unless Michael and I were braking at the threshold of wheel lockup
at the last possible moment, anyone can wait until our lights go on and then
hit their brakes a little harder a little farther down the track and
overtake with the same turnin speed.  Rich describes "standing" on the
brakes.  I don't do that.  Neither does Mike, but he also has F40 calipers.
When I drove behind Mike and Rich (as Jim can testify as a passenger), their
brake lights came on far sooner than I started braking - best example turn
1.  

> I have gone 2 seconds a lap faster under different conditions -- colder
> and
> on a new set of Kuhmos. Nevertheless, nobody was slowing me down that day.
> It was all I could do to keep up with Chuck and Mike. They would pull away
> with their boost controllers, and I'd catch up under braking, and we were
> even through the corners. I learned a lot that day just comparing notes,
> following Mike and Chuck, riding with Chuck, working with you on brake
> fluid and swapping pads, and all that stuff. First time I ever ran with
> another VR4. Much better than running alone.
>
[Willis, Charles E.]  I think Rich and Mike are faster because of
better skills and reaction times, respectively.  Give Rich a boost
controller and he would keep up with Mike.  An advanced instructor this
weekend said the only thing he thinks I need to decrease my lap times on my
home track is bigger braking power, which both Mike and Rich already have.
Mike wore his brakes down to the backers and broke two rotors.  Rich
chuncked his tires.  I corded my front right tire. Driving with other VR4's
is terrific!

> If I had a boost controller, I'd smoke both of them. OTOH, if they had
> better brakes, they'd smoke me. Maybe next time we'll all have improved
> cars, all go two seconds a lap faster, and still lap nose to tail. I'd
> like that.
> Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:14:47 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

> > Just remember that our cars generally are not good at AutoX. 
>
> I beg to differ.  ;-) 

I'm gonna have to beg to differ as well :-)  Especially here in the
NW (where we've already used up our 3 sunny days for the year), AWD cars
often have a significant advantage when it's wet.  They also seem to do
fairly well in the dry as well. 
Two weekends ago, I ran my 2nd AutoX competition, and I had one of
the *best times* (in my class) in the morning session.  The track was wet
from the night before, and it only sprinkled for about 10 minutes during the
session.  In the novice class, almost all of the 15 people ahead of me in
the standings for the day ran the afternoon session (when the track had
dried out).  In the morning session I ran, there were some people who had
better raw times than I, but most of them hit a cone or two.  I hit a total
of one cone in my first 3 runs, and I was pushing it hard.  I could not
believe the car stuck with what I was asking of it.  I was amazed at the
speed with which I could enter/leave "C" boxes and slaloms.  On top of that,
I was only running 0.5 Bar on my boost controller, since I hadn't had time
to recalibrate it for the Stillen downpipe and didn't want to worry about
boost spikes.
As of that event, I've been to 2 AutoX events, one AutoX school, and
one Track Day.  And I've only owned my VR-4 for 5 months.  So, given that
there were many people out there at that AutoX who've done this for YEARS
and have many, many more hours of track time than I, the VR-4 must at least
be competitive, if not provide an some advantage.  I pick up on things
quickly, but not THAT quickly.  The comments I got from instructors riding
with me early in the day at the AutoX school (it was dry) were:  1) "You
need to push your car harder - it can take a lot more than you think.  Spend
more time at WOT." (first few runs of the day as I was getting used to the
course) 2) "You know your car well - you're very smooth with the controls.
Perhaps you need to be a little quicker with your steering input.
Slow-fast-slow as one continuous motion."  (later on in the day) and 3) "I
can't believe a car this big and heavy handles this well." (slalom/hairpin
station).
Yeah, I'll be out there next AutoX season with my VR-4.

- --Erik
- ------                                             ----------
Erik Gross                                         DuPont, WA
'95 Black 3000GT VR-4 (6MT, AWD, 4WS, ECS)          36,000 mi
   Track Setup:  FIPK, HKS TT Exhaust, GReddy PRofecA,
   GReddy TypeS BPV, Stillen DP, TEC Front ST Brace,
   Cusco Rear ST Brace, Optima RedTop, SpeedBleeders,
   Porterfield Cryo Front Rotors, R4S Front Pads,
   Firehawk SZ50EP 245/45/ZR17 @43/37(AutoX), '94 VR-4 Wheels
'94 Algae-Blue "fun to slide around corners" Corolla 80,000mi
http://www.Team3S.com/~egross

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:17:12 -0500
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Handbrake turns

> Okay ... enough slinging Matt.

You implied I don't know how to drive by saying that the other drivers that
I'm competing with suck.  They are road racers who generally win those types
of events.

All I did was mention that perceptions like "Just remember that our cars
generally are not good at AutoX.  I routinely get beat by a New Beetle, FWD
Talon, Integra (NON Type R), etc." can be misleading as our cars CAN be and
are capable of holding their own against those cars.  Even in autocross.

- -Matt

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:18:38 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

correction - rotors are stock SECOND GEN VR4 or custom two piece like Jim's.
Jeff is not going to be able to use his stock 1st gen rotors with Brad's
caliper adapter.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:32 AM
> To: 'Team3s  Tech List'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters
>
> bbedell@austin.rr.com
>
> Good luck.  How much can you get them for?
>
> - Rotors are stock Porterfield rotors from Mohler (cryo treating at your
> request).
> - SS lines from Mohler who had a sale a bit ago or Bedell.
> - Brake fluid from Mohler.
> - Pads from Bedell (Pagid Orange), Carbotech (Panther Plus), or Mohler
> (Porterfield).
> - Instructions from my web page
> (www.Team3S.com/~dschilberg/cars/brakes/BigReds_install.html).
>
> Price everything out and see how much you save.  It will cost a bit more
> sending all the different items through the mail but I'm still
> interested to see how much more you saved.
>
> --Flash!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff VanOrsdal
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:21

> I may be able to get a pair of used 996 calipers at a good deal. This is
> why
> I would not purchase the full kit from Brad.  My problem then is I would
> need the hardware alone.  Brackets, hoses, etc.  I'll also need to track
> down rotors, but that seems simple enough.  I don't have Brad's email
> handy
> (I'm on a business trip right now) otherwise I wouldn't have bothered
> the
> list with this.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

I routinely kicked asses in AS and BSP in our VR4, everytime we'd travel
to another region to go play, we'd BOTH walk away with 1st and 2nd places.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Gross, Erik wrote:

> > > Just remember that our cars generally are not good at AutoX. 
> >
> > I beg to differ.  ;-) 
>
> I'm gonna have to beg to differ as well :-)  Especially here in the
> NW (where we've already used up our 3 sunny days for the year), AWD cars
> often have a significant advantage when it's wet.  They also seem to do
> fairly well in the dry as well. 
> Two weekends ago, I ran my 2nd AutoX competition, and I had one of
> the *best times* (in my class) in the morning session.  The track was wet
> from the night before, and it only sprinkled for about 10 minutes during the
> session.  In the novice class, almost all of the 15 people ahead of me in
> the standings for the day ran the afternoon session (when the track had
> dried out).  In the morning session I ran, there were some people who had
> better raw times than I, but most of them hit a cone or two.  I hit a total
> of one cone in my first 3 runs, and I was pushing it hard.  I could not
> believe the car stuck with what I was asking of it.  I was amazed at the
> speed with which I could enter/leave "C" boxes and slaloms.  On top of that,
> I was only running 0.5 Bar on my boost controller, since I hadn't had time
> to recalibrate it for the Stillen downpipe and didn't want to worry about
> boost spikes.
> As of that event, I've been to 2 AutoX events, one AutoX school, and
> one Track Day.  And I've only owned my VR-4 for 5 months.  So, given that
> there were many people out there at that AutoX who've done this for YEARS
> and have many, many more hours of track time than I, the VR-4 must at least
> be competitive, if not provide an some advantage.  I pick up on things
> quickly, but not THAT quickly.  The comments I got from instructors riding
> with me early in the day at the AutoX school (it was dry) were:  1) "You
> need to push your car harder - it can take a lot more than you think.  Spend
> more time at WOT." (first few runs of the day as I was getting used to the
> course) 2) "You know your car well - you're very smooth with the controls.
> Perhaps you need to be a little quicker with your steering input.
> Slow-fast-slow as one continuous motion."  (later on in the day) and 3) "I
> can't believe a car this big and heavy handles this well." (slalom/hairpin
> station).
> Yeah, I'll be out there next AutoX season with my VR-4.
>
> --Erik
> ------                                             ----------
> Erik Gross                                         DuPont, WA
> '95 Black 3000GT VR-4 (6MT, AWD, 4WS, ECS)          36,000 mi
>    Track Setup:  FIPK, HKS TT Exhaust, GReddy PRofecA,
>    GReddy TypeS BPV, Stillen DP, TEC Front ST Brace,
>    Cusco Rear ST Brace, Optima RedTop, SpeedBleeders,
>    Porterfield Cryo Front Rotors, R4S Front Pads,
>    Firehawk SZ50EP 245/45/ZR17 @43/37(AutoX), '94 VR-4 Wheels
> '94 Algae-Blue "fun to slide around corners" Corolla 80,000mi
> http://www.Team3S.com/~egross

Geoff Mohler


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:27:38 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

Chuck -- You also teach to hit the brakes harder at first and then back
off of them, right?  I was always taught this is the worst thing to do
(maybe with your stock brakes and Panther pads it works).  When I do
that with my Big Reds they grab so hard initially that the wheel locks
up (not sure which one) and the backend gets loose.  In-car footage of
this also.

I now have to start braking and get harder as the corner gets closer.

I also wore down to the backing plate on the front pads.  Didn't crack a
rotor luckily.  Racing ... er ... driving with other 3/S cars is truly a
blast.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Charles E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:15
 
Late braking is a standard racing trick for catching up with
anybody.  Unless Michael and I were braking at the threshold of wheel
lockup
at the last possible moment, anyone can wait until our lights go on and
then
hit their brakes a little harder a little farther down the track and
overtake with the same turnin speed.  Rich describes "standing" on the
brakes.  I don't do that.  Neither does Mike, but he also has F40
calipers.
When I drove behind Mike and Rich (as Jim can testify as a passenger),
their
brake lights came on far sooner than I started braking - best example
turn
1.  
 
I think Rich and Mike are faster because of
better skills and reaction times, respectively.  Give Rich a boost
controller and he would keep up with Mike.  An advanced instructor this
weekend said the only thing he thinks I need to decrease my lap times on
my
home track is bigger braking power, which both Mike and Rich already
have.
Mike wore his brakes down to the backers and broke two rotors.  Rich
chuncked his tires.  I corded my front right tire. Driving with other
VR4's is terrific!

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:29:54 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

Sorry that I can't memorize everyone's cars and applications all the
time.  Remember that Jeff is the one with a VR-4 motor in his Stealth ES
I recall.  How do I know he didn't already upgrade to second gen VR-4
brakes?  At least, I think this is the car I saw at Ocean City.  Hence
the letter "X" in the badge.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Charles E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:19
 
correction - rotors are stock SECOND GEN VR4 or custom two piece like
Jim's.
Jeff is not going to be able to use his stock 1st gen rotors with Brad's
caliper adapter.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> I now have to start braking and get harder as the corner gets closer.
- ---
This sounds like you could be braking more later and still avoid lockup.

Dunno, I havent driven a 3S in so long anyway..
 
> I also wore down to the backing plate on the front pads.  Didn't crack a
> rotor luckily.  Racing ... er ... driving with other 3/S cars is truly a
> blast.
>
> --Flash!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willis, Charles E.
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:15

> Late braking is a standard racing trick for catching up with
> anybody.  Unless Michael and I were braking at the threshold of wheel
> lockup
> at the last possible moment, anyone can wait until our lights go on and
> then
> hit their brakes a little harder a little farther down the track and
> overtake with the same turnin speed.  Rich describes "standing" on the
> brakes.  I don't do that.  Neither does Mike, but he also has F40
> calipers.
> When I drove behind Mike and Rich (as Jim can testify as a passenger),
> their
> brake lights came on far sooner than I started braking - best example
> turn
> 1.  

> I think Rich and Mike are faster because of
> better skills and reaction times, respectively.  Give Rich a boost
> controller and he would keep up with Mike.  An advanced instructor this
> weekend said the only thing he thinks I need to decrease my lap times on
> my
> home track is bigger braking power, which both Mike and Rich already
> have.
> Mike wore his brakes down to the backers and broke two rotors.  Rich
> chuncked his tires.  I corded my front right tire. Driving with other
> VR4's
> is terrific!

Geoff Mohler

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:42:55 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Handbrake turns

Okay ... fair enough.

Now I can send you to the page of results so you can see that when I get
beat I don't care most times what percentage that is.  In raw numbers it
was by between 0.75 and 3.0 seconds.  Not long to most people but on a
45-second course that is between 1.6% and 6.6% faster.  Take them to a
road course and I spank them by a full 10 seconds (at Nelson Ledges)
over 1:40 which is a full 10%.  The same % different in AutoX (6%) on
the road course of Watkins Glen (2:35) is a difference of 9.3 seconds
and I would beat them more than that on that course.  Get them on a
small, tight, twisty course and they beat me.  No questions asked.

The mods I do to my car are for the road course.  Not to make it look
pretty.  Not for a dragstrip.  Not for AutoX.  Not for car shows.  Not
for touring the highway.  We have all of those people on the list
however.  Sorry they had to sit through these non-technical emails.

> You implied I don't know how to drive by saying that the other drivers

> That I'm competing with suck.  They are road racers who generally win
> those types of events.

What types of events?  Road events or AutoX events?  Remember that road
events are not AutoX events by any stretch of imagination.  I have never
personally witnessed a 3/S car mostly stock do good at any small-course
AutoX.  There is one two hours away in Ohio with 60+ second courses that
might be better-suited and the Nationals are probably better suited but
I have not seen our car without suspension or engine mods do well.  End
of story.

From now on, you are God, Matt.  You are the best damned racer I've ever
known.  Fair enough?  You and I need to meet up sometime I guess to bury
the hatchet.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:43:39 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

Who taught you to ease onto the brakes?  I don't know any book or high
performance driving school that teaches that. That is exactly what is taught
in street driver's education for the comfort of the passengers. Threashold
braking is to get on the brakes hard initially APPROACHING wheel lockup, not
CAUSING wheel lockup.  If the back end gets loose when you brake hard
initially, then I'd be willing to bet the wheels weren't pointed in a
straight line - I can make the rear end get loose all day doing that.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:28 PM
> To: 'Team3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water
>
> Chuck -- You also teach to hit the brakes harder at first and then back
> off of them, right?  I was always taught this is the worst thing to do
> (maybe with your stock brakes and Panther pads it works).  When I do
> that with my Big Reds they grab so hard initially that the wheel locks
> up (not sure which one) and the backend gets loose.  In-car footage of
> this also.
>
> I now have to start braking and get harder as the corner gets closer.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:46:52 -0500
From: "cody" <overclck@starband.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: NOS injection

No...  there is "propane" injection...  But that's all I know about it.

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of George Shaw
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Team3S Technical Forum
Subject: Team3S: NOS injection


NOS injection, does it work on diesel engines?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:47:51 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

Again ... this is a modded car.  BC, downpipe, exhaust, front strut
tower brace.  Not stock by any means.

Kudos, though Erik.  We only get to race in dry conditions at AutoX.  No
fun for me.  They don't run in the rain/snow.  Delay it until the rain
stops and most people don't even run when it is wet.  They just come
back next week.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of Gross, Erik
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:15
To: 'Team3S List (E-mail)'
Subject: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

> > Just remember that our cars generally are not good at AutoX. 
>
> I beg to differ.  ;-) 

I'm gonna have to beg to differ as well :-)  Especially here in
the
NW (where we've already used up our 3 sunny days for the year), AWD cars
often have a significant advantage when it's wet.  They also seem to do
fairly well in the dry as well. 
Two weekends ago, I ran my 2nd AutoX competition, and I had one
of
the *best times* (in my class) in the morning session.  The track was
wet
from the night before, and it only sprinkled for about 10 minutes during
the
session.  In the novice class, almost all of the 15 people ahead of me
in
the standings for the day ran the afternoon session (when the track had
dried out).  In the morning session I ran, there were some people who
had
better raw times than I, but most of them hit a cone or two.  I hit a
total
of one cone in my first 3 runs, and I was pushing it hard.  I could not
believe the car stuck with what I was asking of it.  I was amazed at the
speed with which I could enter/leave "C" boxes and slaloms.  On top of
that,
I was only running 0.5 Bar on my boost controller, since I hadn't had
time
to recalibrate it for the Stillen downpipe and didn't want to worry
about
boost spikes.
As of that event, I've been to 2 AutoX events, one AutoX school,
and
one Track Day.  And I've only owned my VR-4 for 5 months.  So, given
that
there were many people out there at that AutoX who've done this for
YEARS
and have many, many more hours of track time than I, the VR-4 must at
least
be competitive, if not provide an some advantage.  I pick up on things
quickly, but not THAT quickly.  The comments I got from instructors
riding
with me early in the day at the AutoX school (it was dry) were:  1) "You
need to push your car harder - it can take a lot more than you think.
Spend
more time at WOT." (first few runs of the day as I was getting used to
the
course) 2) "You know your car well - you're very smooth with the
controls.
Perhaps you need to be a little quicker with your steering input.
Slow-fast-slow as one continuous motion."  (later on in the day) and 3)
"I
can't believe a car this big and heavy handles this well."
(slalom/hairpin
station).
Yeah, I'll be out there next AutoX season with my VR-4.

- --Erik
- ------                                             ----------
Erik Gross                                         DuPont, WA
'95 Black 3000GT VR-4 (6MT, AWD, 4WS, ECS)          36,000 mi
   Track Setup:  FIPK, HKS TT Exhaust, GReddy PRofecA,
   GReddy TypeS BPV, Stillen DP, TEC Front ST Brace,
   Cusco Rear ST Brace, Optima RedTop, SpeedBleeders,
   Porterfield Cryo Front Rotors, R4S Front Pads,
   Firehawk SZ50EP 245/45/ZR17 @43/37(AutoX), '94 VR-4 Wheels
'94 Algae-Blue "fun to slide around corners" Corolla 80,000mi
http://www.Team3S.com/~egross

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:55:56 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

I believe it was Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book that told me to start
braking at 10% then 20% then 40% then 60%.  I'll have to find it in the
book.  I don't think anyone SLAMS on the brakes and then eases off of
them.  That is just nuts.  You start at 0 and apply harder, harder, and
harder and then release.  Now the time going from 0% to 80% braking
might be 0.25 seconds or it might be over 300 feet but still you start
easy and get harder.

The wheel lockup point was at Mid-Ohio.  Backstretch.  Braking at the
400 foot mark initially until I got used to what to do.  Doing 120 mph
at that point.  Perfectly straight line.  I pushed the pedal to the
floor and we dove forward (stock suspension remember) a chirp was heard
(most likely one of the front wheels) and the back end got squirrely.
Hands were perfectly straight (meaning the front wheels were straight as
well).  Have that on video for proof.

Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
slam on the brakes?  Rich?

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Charles E. [mailto:cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:44
 
Who taught you to ease onto the brakes?  I don't know any book or high
performance driving school that teaches that. That is exactly what is
taught
in street driver's education for the comfort of the passengers.
Threashold
braking is to get on the brakes hard initially APPROACHING wheel lockup,
not
CAUSING wheel lockup.  If the back end gets loose when you brake hard
initially, then I'd be willing to bet the wheels weren't pointed in a
straight line - I can make the rear end get loose all day doing that.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:55:04 -0400
From: Curtis McConnel <CMcConnel@Pulte.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: NOS injection

Just out of curiosity.... Can you not run NOS in a diesel because it will
cool the chamber too much?

Curtis 1995 V4-4 Spyder

- -----Original Message-----
From: cody [mailto:overclck@starband.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:47 AM
To: george.shaw@btinternet.com; 'Team3S'
Subject: RE: Team3S: NOS injection


No...  there is "propane" injection...  But that's all I know about it.

- -Cody

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
Of George Shaw
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:30 AM
To: Team3S Technical Forum
Subject: Team3S: NOS injection

NOS injection, does it work on diesel engines?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:01:48 -0700
From: "Jim Berry" <fastmax@home.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection

I would expect NOS would work on a diesel but the cylinder pressures are
very high to start with, you 're likely to blow the heads off.

        Jim Berry
============================================
- ----- Original Message -----
From: cody <overclck@starband.net>
To: <george.shaw@btinternet.com>; 'Team3S' <team3s@mail.speedtoys.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Team3S: NOS injection


> No...  there is "propane" injection...  But that's all I know about it.
>
> -Cody
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-team3s@team3s.com [mailto:owner-team3s@team3s.com] On Behalf
> Of George Shaw
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:30 AM
> To: Team3S Technical Forum
> Subject: Team3S: NOS injection
>
>
> NOS injection, does it work on diesel engines?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:07:01 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

> Again ... this is a modded car.  BC, downpipe, exhaust, front strut
> tower brace.  Not stock by any means.

Technically, yes.  But as I said, I had my BC set at 7psi, so I was nowhere
near stock horsepower, let alone "modified" power.  Intake and exhaust help
with throttle response and turbo spool, but I think setting the BC at 7psi
pretty much negates those modifications for the purposes of our discussion.
The front and rear strut tower braces help some with handling (exactly how
much, I don't know), but just about EVERY car at this AutoX had strut tower
braces.  Thus I think that's a wash as well.  I ran with full interior,
spare tire, jack, tools, seats, FULL tank of gas, etc.  I also had stock
wheels (from a '94, but who cares? :-) and DOT-legal tires.  I even had my
stock brakes on that day since I didn't have time to change to the R4S ones.
Stock?  No.  Reasonably close?  Yeah.

> Kudos, though Erik.  We only get to race in dry conditions at
> AutoX.  No fun for me.  They don't run in the rain/snow.
> Delay it until the rain stops and most people don't even
> run when it is wet.  They just come back next week.

Thanks - you need to get the guys out there to stop being wussies <g> and
run in the wet!  It's so much fun :-)  I'm curious to see how I'll do next
season when I get a few more dry events under my belt.  ...I wish we got
snow here (too close to the water) - AutoX in the snow...  that'd be
interesting.

- --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:09:40 -0500
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: AutoX/Solo II and VR-4s WAS: Handbrake turns

> Thanks - you need to get the guys out there to stop being
> wussies <g> and run in the wet!  It's so much fun :-)  I'm
> curious to see how I'll do next season when I get a few more
> dry events under my belt.  ...I wish we got snow here (too
> close to the water) - AutoX in the snow...  that'd be interesting.

Around here we do it on dirt (snow is too dangerous)...  They call it
RallyCross.  I don't do it in the 3000, but I tried it a few times with my
Eclipse GSX - lotsa fun, but lots of cleaning afterwards!  Ice racing is
fun, too.

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 11:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection

Diesels need oxygen also.

Here are a couple of places that sells kits for diesel engines.
http://www.magnumforceracing.com/store4/nitrous_kits_diesel.htm
http://speeddepot.com/NOS.htm

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George Shaw" <george.shaw@btinternet.com>
To: "Team3S Technical Forum" <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: Team3S: NOS injection

NOS injection, does it work on diesel engines?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:11:18 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

Chuck -- Read below an excerpt from a book.  What did Geoff just say?
He would take info from a book over the advice from someone's mouth any
day?  In this case so do I.  Like I said, your stock brakes might
perform differently than my Big Reds.  I can not slam.  Front wheel
lockup and rear end dancing.  Maybe you should remember this before
instructing someone with huge front brakes and a heavy car next time.
<grin>

Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book
Page 73
Chapter 5: Braking and Entering
Block 1: Throttle-Brake Transition
Section: No Slams

"Here, you're moving your foot from the throttle to the brake pedal
*fast*, but the build up of pressure is a hard-squeeze as opposed to a
"slam."  Slamming on the brakes is a common mistake.  Some drivers hit
the brake pedal as if driving a nail with a hammer.  This often results
in instantaneous front wheel lockup.  This lockup occurs because the
front brakes start slowing down the front tires before load transfer can
help deliver extra grip."

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4

- -----Original Message-----
From: Darren Schilberg
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:56
 
I believe it was Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book that told me to start
braking at 10% then 20% then 40% then 60%.  I'll have to find it in the
book.  I don't think anyone SLAMS on the brakes and then eases off of
them.  That is just nuts.  You start at 0 and apply harder, harder, and
harder and then release.  Now the time going from 0% to 80% braking
might be 0.25 seconds or it might be over 300 feet but still you start
easy and get harder.

The wheel lockup point was at Mid-Ohio.  Backstretch.  Braking at the
400 foot mark initially until I got used to what to do.  Doing 120 mph
at that point.  Perfectly straight line.  I pushed the pedal to the
floor and we dove forward (stock suspension remember) a chirp was heard
(most likely one of the front wheels) and the back end got squirrely.
Hands were perfectly straight (meaning the front wheels were straight as
well).  Have that on video for proof.

Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
slam on the brakes?  Rich?

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Charles E. [mailto:cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:44
 
Who taught you to ease onto the brakes?  I don't know any book or high
performance driving school that teaches that. That is exactly what is
taught
in street driver's education for the comfort of the passengers.
Threashold
braking is to get on the brakes hard initially APPROACHING wheel lockup,
not
CAUSING wheel lockup.  If the back end gets loose when you brake hard
initially, then I'd be willing to bet the wheels weren't pointed in a
straight line - I can make the rear end get loose all day doing that.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:26:12 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:56 PM
> To: 'Team3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water
>
> I believe it was Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book that told me to start
> braking at 10% then 20% then 40% then 60%.  I'll have to find it in the
> book.  I don't think anyone SLAMS on the brakes and then eases off of
> them.  That is just nuts.  You start at 0 and apply harder, harder, and
> harder and then release.  Now the time going from 0% to 80% braking
> might be 0.25 seconds or it might be over 300 feet but still you start
> easy and get harder.
[Willis, Charles E.]  I've got the book, too.  I will look and be
extremely surprised if they say that.

> The wheel lockup point was at Mid-Ohio.  Backstretch.  Braking at the
> 400 foot mark initially until I got used to what to do.  Doing 120 mph
> at that point.  Perfectly straight line.  I pushed the pedal to the
> floor and we dove forward (stock suspension remember) a chirp was heard
> (most likely one of the front wheels) and the back end got squirrely.
> Hands were perfectly straight (meaning the front wheels were straight as
> well).  Have that on video for proof.
[Willis, Charles E.]  1) my steering wheel is about 15 degrees off -
depends on where you put your hands.
2)  As I recall you are not running improved pads on the rear.  You
are making my point for me - you pushed the pedal to the floor, you didn't
need to.  Try pushing a little lighter to start with and let up from there.

> Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
> slam on the brakes?  Rich?

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:45:10 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

I don't have that good a memory either - I just read his signature block
which said '91 ...

Chuck
(best thing about Altsheimers is that I keep making new friends everyday!)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 12:30 PM
> To: 'Team3s  Tech List'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters
>
> Sorry that I can't memorize everyone's cars and applications all the
> time.  Remember that Jeff is the one with a VR-4 motor in his Stealth ES
> I recall.  How do I know he didn't already upgrade to second gen VR-4
> brakes?  At least, I think this is the car I saw at Ocean City.  Hence
> the letter "X" in the badge.
>
> --Flash!
> 1995 VR-4
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willis, Charles E.
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:19

> correction - rotors are stock SECOND GEN VR4 or custom two piece like
> Jim's.
> Jeff is not going to be able to use his stock 1st gen rotors with Brad's
> caliper adapter.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:36:45 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

This quote is not at all different from what I have been saying - I said
don't stand on the brakes.  I said "Approach the threashold of wheel
lockup", NOT "Lockup the wheels".

This quote is NOT saying "EASE onto the brakes" or "RAMP UP on the brakes".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:11 PM
> To: 'Team3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water
>
> "Here, you're moving your foot from the throttle to the brake pedal
> *fast*, but the build up of pressure is a hard-squeeze as opposed to a
> "slam."  Slamming on the brakes is a common mistake.  Some drivers hit
> the brake pedal as if driving a nail with a hammer.  This often results
> in instantaneous front wheel lockup.  This lockup occurs because the
> front brakes start slowing down the front tires before load transfer can
> help deliver extra grip."
>
> --Flash!
> 1995 VR-4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:46:59 -0500
From: "John C. Davidson" <jd@edge-software.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
> slam on the brakes?  Rich?

I don't hit the track, but I can confirm that the Big Reds can
be locked up rather easily.  I've done it a few times, some testcases
and some real-world necessity, but the rear never got loose on me (all
were relatively straight line stops).

I found that braking hard right to the point of lockup then quickly
easing off just a bit works best for me.  FWIW, I am running 275s
all around, have porterfield rotors, the OE porsche pads up front,
porterfield pads on the rears, and have SS lines.

   -JD

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: AmkreadGTO <amkreadgto@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

As long as we're on the subject of squirting water..
has anyone seen this?

http://www.seinesystems.com/MPC-Home.htm

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:02:57 -0700
From: "Jim Berry" <fastmax@home.com>
Subject: ?Re: Team3S: RE:squirting water

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Willis, Charles E. <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>

> This quote is not at all different from what I have been saying - I said
> don't stand on the brakes.  I said "Approach the threshold of wheel
> lockup", NOT "Lockup the wheels".

?!?!?! does this mean you drive without the ABS ?!?!?!?!

With ABS you should be able to hammer the brakes without fear
of lockup. As a matter of fact you can't find wheel lockup point on
our car with ABS because you dont get that vibration/feedback
from the pedal.

        Jim Berry

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:10:10 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Porsche 996 caliper adapters

I know, Chuck, I read it also but his signature does not tell you he has
a VR-4 engine in a Stealth ES does it?  I happened to remember that from
seeing it at Ocean City.  I was assuming that if was asking about Big
Reds he was already familiar with the concept and either already
upgraded to second gen rotors or didn't need to worry about that (since
he only mentioned the calipers and lines and nothing about pads and
fluid).

Alzheimer's also lets you hide your own Easter Eggs.

- --Flash!
1995 VR-4 and Big Reds

- -----Original Message-----
From: Willis, Charles E.
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:45
 
I don't have that good a memory either - I just read his signature block
which said '91 ...

Chuck
(best thing about Altsheimers is that I keep making new friends
everyday!)

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:00:49 -0700
From: "Darc" <wce@telus.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE:squirting water

Rich...they told Orville and Wilbur that they couldn't fly. A wealth of
information was published on the subject, that relegated such fanciful
thinking to realm of madcaps and birds.  Keep on a keepin on ;-))  If it
works, and works good, why stop using it.

Darc


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 12:08:22 -0700
From: "Darc" <wce@telus.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Speed Bleeder Discount For Team3S Members

I think the only difference is the bleeders. And apparently, as Jeff noted,
only for about a year period.

Darc
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
To: <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 6:22 AM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Speed Bleeder Discount For Team3S Members

> Wow!  If the bleed screws are different are the rear calipers
> different too?  Or still just the old single piston floating caliper?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Darc [SMTP:wce@telus.net]
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:20 PM
> > To: Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st
> > Subject: Re: Team3S: Speed Bleeder Discount For Team3S Members
> >
> > An  FYI addendum  this subject.... The Stealth 1st Gen TT's do not take
> > the
> > size 7 on the rears as reported in previous threads. The size 7 is for
the
> > Mitsu 1st gen rears only. This information is reflected accurately at
the
> > Speed Bleeder site where 10's are noted for Stealth rears, and 7's for
> > Mitsu
> > rears. So, do note this difference in the cars, and do not go by
previous
> > threads here (as  I did) if you have a Stealth.  Mitsu and Stealth
rears,
> > are different.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:05:06 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

>Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
>slam on the brakes?  Rich?
>
Yer not supposed to slam on the brakes nohow. I stand on them (e.g., exert
maximum force), but I don't slam on 'em. I probably do that 10-20-50-100%
thing, but it only takes a second or so.

Actually, I have a very bad habit of tapping them before the corner just to
see if I still have a pedal before I commit. I learned that running with
stock calipers for two seasons.

Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:26:31 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

I know you are not supposed to slam them on but Chuck was flat out
telling me to hit them hard and back away (correct me if I'm wrong,
Chuck).  This book and my other two instructors tell me something like
"Apply them and then add more pressure as you go and do NOT start at 60
or 80% and get easier."

There are a ton more quotes from that chapter in the book.  Anyone who
has it handy should read it again to maybe add a different vantage
point.

Page 74, "Going Faster"
To locate the limit [of braking], you're going to have to push harder
and harder on the brake pedal until at some point there is too much
pressure and the tire locks.

Page 76, "Going Faster"
In a threshold braking zone, it doesn't make sense to start going deeper
before you are certain that you're using maximum braking.  The first
step in a procedure for making up time on corner approaches is to push
harder and harder on the brake pedal to identify where the threshold is.
Once you get to the point where you lock up a tire occasionally, you can
start to move the brake point closer to the corner.

Do I really have to type the entire Chapter in here?  Certainly people
aren't believing this theory of "stand on the brakes hard and then ease
off as you approach" that Chuck teaches.  I certainly don't and I will
plainly admit that.

- --Flash!

- -----Original Message-----
From: Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 15:05
 
Yer not supposed to slam on the brakes nohow. I stand on them (e.g.,
exert
maximum force), but I don't slam on 'em. I probably do that
10-20-50-100%
thing, but it only takes a second or so.

Actually, I have a very bad habit of tapping them before the corner just
to
see if I still have a pedal before I commit. I learned that running with
stock calipers for two seasons.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:48:27 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: Team3S: Braking Techniques WAS:squirting water

Ok, so I have "the book" too and read it less than a month ago.  The way I
read the passages people have been referring to:

The "start low and increase pedal pressure toward lockup" is the way you
safely find your maximum threshold braking point.  If you don't know what
that is for your car/track/weather(it changes all the time), then you have
to find it.  Once you have an idea of where that point is, you get there as
soon as you can when you start braking.  This "ramp up" in braking pressure
takes 0.5 seconds or so, maybe even 0.25 seconds.  It's a "squeeze" motion,
not a striking motion, but it's still VERY quick.  Look at the graphs of
pedal pressure in the braking zones.  If you were watching a camera on the
driver's foot, I doubt you could visually tell the difference between the
squeeze and the strike - it has a lot to do with how stiff your ankle is.
Never did I read anything that said something about slowly increasing
braking pressure over a period of more than one second.  You lose time off
your lap if you do that.

The "brake hard and then taper off" thing, I'm guessing, is trail-braking -
braking after turn-in at less-than-maximum force.  OTOH, it could also be
part of your "experimentation" phase at the beginning of the day - you
eventually find your threshold braking point and get consistent with it...
then you move you braking point on the track closer and closer to the
turn-in point.  If you figure out the threshold-braking point (pedal, not
track) and are braking 100ft too early, then you'll notice that as you
approach turn-in and it would then be wise to ease off a little early so as
not to slow down too much.

my 2hp...

- --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:51:30 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg [SMTP:dschilberg@pobox.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:27 PM
> To: 'Team3S'
> Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water
>
> I know you are not supposed to slam them on but Chuck was flat out
> telling me to hit them hard and back away (correct me if I'm wrong,
> Chuck).  This book and my other two instructors tell me something like
> "Apply them and then add more pressure as you go and do NOT start at 60
> or 80% and get easier."
[Willis, Charles E.]  Not the book, possibly your instructors.  This
is not the way threshold braking is taught at Porsche Club DE.

> There are a ton more quotes from that chapter in the book.  Anyone who
> has it handy should read it again to maybe add a different vantage
> point.
>
>
> Page 74, "Going Faster"
> To locate the limit [of braking], you're going to have to push harder
> and harder on the brake pedal until at some point there is too much
> pressure and the tire locks.
[Willis, Charles E.]  This is to locate it, not routinely to use it.

> Page 76, "Going Faster"
> In a threshold braking zone, it doesn't make sense to start going deeper
> before you are certain that you're using maximum braking.  The first
> step in a procedure for making up time on corner approaches is to push
> harder and harder on the brake pedal to identify where the threshold is.
> Once you get to the point where you lock up a tire occasionally, you can
> start to move the brake point closer to the corner.
[Willis, Charles E.]  Again, this is working up to finding the
appropriate braking zone, like during practice, not routinely.

> Do I really have to type the entire Chapter in here?  Certainly people
> aren't believing this theory of "stand on the brakes hard and then ease
> off as you approach" that Chuck teaches.  I certainly don't and I will
> plainly admit that.
>
[Willis, Charles E.]  RTFM, Flash!  I NEVER said STAND on the
brakes.  I argued with Rich about a year ago about his specific use of that
term in a race report on Heartland Park.  Brake however you want, but be
prepared to grind down a lot of pads in the process and boil a lot of brake
fluid.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:57:52 -0500
From: "Willis, Charles E." <cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braking Techniques WAS:squirting water

some instructors describe it exactly as you did - SQUEEZING the brakes - I
never said HIT them, I said GET ON the brakes hard and release slightly.  I
also teach to GET OFF the brakes CLEANLY before turnin - I don't teach trail
braking, I only do it when I screwup and don't get the car in position in
time.  Skip Barber and the book in question DO teach trail braking
extensively.  No PCA Region that I know of teaches trail braking because it
is deemed dangerous or at least risky, especially for novice students.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gross, Erik [SMTP:erik.gross@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: 'Team3S'
> Subject: Team3S: Braking Techniques WAS:squirting water
>
> --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:59:54 -0400
From: "anthonymelillo" <anthonymelillo@home.com>
Subject: Team3S: removing triple-gauge cluster

I just received my Indiglo Gauges, and understand hot to remove the instrument cluster.  But I was wondering if there was an easier
way to remove the triple-gauges (water,oil,boost) that doesn't involve removing the entire dash, and center console ?

Anthony Melillo
anthonymelillo@home.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:05:22 -0400
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braking Techniques

Beats me, Erik.  All I know is Chuck did tell me to push the brake pedal
harder initially and then back off.  Who cares what the terms are
(strike, stand, stamp, pound, press, apply, etc.).  I took it to mean
apply gradually and then release quickly and get back to throttle.  A
graph would ramp up slower than it came down (since why should you
release the brake slowly in most corners?).

It is days like this that aggravate the snot out of me.  I know there
are scads of other people out there who are sitting back and not
speaking their thoughts.  Maybe it is just me.  But as many people say
the Big Reds DO grab too hard sometimes (not all the time, not when ABS
fuses are taken out, not when 275-width rubber is used) but most times
people can lock up a wheel or two if they want.

I'm bowing out since I am on a losing battle ground.  Everything I say
is either construed as wrong or someone feels they have to argue with
the points.  When my sentences are being quoted directly from a book and
people question me then it is like slapping me in the face by saying I
don't know what I am talking about.

I have learned a lot from seeing what people do and modifying it.  I
have learned a lot from changing my disbelief into trying it and
realizing it works.  That is what the list is for.

Good day and happy braking.

- --Flash!

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 14:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection effect on compression ratio and combustion chamber volume.

Compression -ratio- is a value constant to your hardware..is the
difference in volume at BDC and TDC basically.

The amount of air/fuel/etc IN the cylinder has nothing to do wth
compression ration, but the amount and types of material will directly
affect your cylinder pressure as it ignites.

I agree that a straight CR and how its measured by adding boost are
different, but you didnt say your mechanic mentioned the effective
CR...only CR itself.

On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Mark Wendlandt wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Not to quibble, but, is your statement really true?
>
> >You increase cylinder pressure, nothing you do short of different
> >pistons/etc will change compression ratio
>
> Maybe you should clarify that you are talking about the static compression
> ratio.  Our turbos(under boost conditions) increase the compression ratio. 
> The difference is that it is dynamic compression vs. static compression
> (bore x stroke).
>
> The since the turbos are pushing air into the cylinders, the dynamic
> compression ratio goes up (since there is more than 1 atmosphere being
> compressed).  Can the same be said for NOS?  Since it is usually activated
> at WOT, I would say no because pressure can't be built up unless the
> throttle plate is closed (bad!).  Thoughts?
>
> Mark Wendlandt
> '91RT/TT

Geoff Mohler

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:34:59 -0400
From: "Volthause" <volt@vozuluzov.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Braking Techniques

You want thoughts?  Here they are:

I think the grand point is, when entering a corner at track speed and you
have to think about how to apply the brakes for your given situation, you
(not *you* specific) are what those of us in the motorsports sector consider
OSB.

That would be "other sports beckon".

- -Scott Holthausen

(snip)

> It is days like this that aggravate the snot out of me.  I know there
> are scads of other people out there who are sitting back and not
> speaking their thoughts.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:27:44 -0500
From: "Mark Wendlandt" <stealth_tt@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: NOS injection effect on compression ratio and combustion chamber volume.

Geoff,

Not to quibble, but, is your statement really true?

>You increase cylinder pressure, nothing you do short of different
>pistons/etc will change compression ratio

Maybe you should clarify that you are talking about the static compression
ratio.  Our turbos(under boost conditions) increase the compression ratio. 
The difference is that it is dynamic compression vs. static compression
(bore x stroke).

The since the turbos are pushing air into the cylinders, the dynamic
compression ratio goes up (since there is more than 1 atmosphere being
compressed).  Can the same be said for NOS?  Since it is usually activated
at WOT, I would say no because pressure can't be built up unless the
throttle plate is closed (bad!).  Thoughts?

Mark Wendlandt
'91RT/TT

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:00:32 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braking Techniques

Darren,
I don't claim to speak for others here (though I hope they feel
similarly), but I'm not *at all* trying to attack you personally, nor
anything you have said.  I may disagree with a point or two, but that's all
it is - a disagreement.  Disagreements lead to discussions, which generally
lead to learning...  and that's what it's all about, right?  I have some
information in my head from books/people/experience and it leads me to a
conclusion.  You have information in your head (and different amounts/types
as well) and sometimes come to the same conclusion ... and sometimes not.
We're all learning here, although some more often than others :-)  I often
find myself in the latter group. 
One of the things I really like about this group is that many of us
are informed about various subjects and are not afraid to "stick our necks
out" and comment on a subject.  That obviously includes you:-)  Yeah,
sometimes discussions can get heated, and sometimes people take things
personally, but I don't think that is people's intentions.  Please don't see
these discussions as a battle or contest of who can be right more often -
that's not the point.  I like being right (and being able to prove it) as
much as the next guy, but given the choice, I'd rather have someone teach me
something.  You and others provide valuable info and experience to the rest
of us, whether people disagree with you or not.
As far as the "strike, stand, stamp, pound, press, apply, etc."
think, look at some of my previous comments - I used "stand" several times
to refer to my braking at the track.  Probably the wrong word to use, but it
sounds cool :-)  For me, however, the difference between "strike" and
"squeeze" makes a big difference in how I visualize applying the brakes, so
that analogy works for me.  For someone else, he may hear the same thing and
the example is totally lost because the terms are indistinguishable to him.
On the AutoX subject, the events in your (and Merritt's) neck of the
woods must be a little different - I can't imagine a course where one lap
was completely contained in 1/2 acre.  The ones I've been to take up 1/2 of
2 airport runways with lap times in the 55-80 second range.  I can
occasionally hit the top of second gear(65-70) and never use first except
for the first 3 seconds after the starting line.  I can see how our cars
would be at a disadvantage in a 1/2 acre course.

- --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:15:33 -0500
From: "bdtrent" <bdtrent@netzero.net>
Subject: Team3S: Braking With Reds

I have never heard of or read any suggestion that easing into the brakes
under high perfomance driving is a preferred technique.  I hit the brakes
hard initially and stay on them making slight adjustments to suit.   Running
big reds at the limit of ABS, I have never experienced any of the twitchy
tail that Darren keeps refering to.  Common sense should tell you the
fastest lap is taken using max braking as late as possible.  As Keith Code
writes in A Twist of the Wrist, the goal of any racer is to drive the track
full on or full off.  From initial braking to track out, the tires should be
consistently at the limit of adheasion.  This is easier said than done, but
the goal none the less.

Regards,
DaveT/92TT

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Darren Schilberg" <dschilberg@pobox.com>
To: "'Team3S'" <team3s@mail.speedtoys.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE:squirting water

> Chuck -- Read below an excerpt from a book.  What did Geoff just say?
> He would take info from a book over the advice from someone's mouth any
> day?  In this case so do I.  Like I said, your stock brakes might
> perform differently than my Big Reds.  I can not slam.  Front wheel
> lockup and rear end dancing.  Maybe you should remember this before
> instructing someone with huge front brakes and a heavy car next time.
> <grin>
>
> Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book
> Page 73
> Chapter 5: Braking and Entering
> Block 1: Throttle-Brake Transition
> Section: No Slams
>
> "Here, you're moving your foot from the throttle to the brake pedal
> *fast*, but the build up of pressure is a hard-squeeze as opposed to a
> "slam."  Slamming on the brakes is a common mistake.  Some drivers hit
> the brake pedal as if driving a nail with a hammer.  This often results
> in instantaneous front wheel lockup.  This lockup occurs because the
> front brakes start slowing down the front tires before load transfer can
> help deliver extra grip."
>
> --Flash!
> 1995 VR-4
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Schilberg
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:56
>
> I believe it was Skip Barber's "Going Faster" book that told me to start
> braking at 10% then 20% then 40% then 60%.  I'll have to find it in the
> book.  I don't think anyone SLAMS on the brakes and then eases off of
> them.  That is just nuts.  You start at 0 and apply harder, harder, and
> harder and then release.  Now the time going from 0% to 80% braking
> might be 0.25 seconds or it might be over 300 feet but still you start
> easy and get harder.
>
> The wheel lockup point was at Mid-Ohio.  Backstretch.  Braking at the
> 400 foot mark initially until I got used to what to do.  Doing 120 mph
> at that point.  Perfectly straight line.  I pushed the pedal to the
> floor and we dove forward (stock suspension remember) a chirp was heard
> (most likely one of the front wheels) and the back end got squirrely.
> Hands were perfectly straight (meaning the front wheels were straight as
> well).  Have that on video for proof.
>
> Can anyone backup that Big Reds grab too hard initially to absolutely
> slam on the brakes?  Rich?
>
> --Flash!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Willis, Charles E. [mailto:cewillis@TexasChildrensHospital.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 13:44
>
> Who taught you to ease onto the brakes?  I don't know any book or high
> performance driving school that teaches that. That is exactly what is
> taught
> in street driver's education for the comfort of the passengers.
> Threashold
> braking is to get on the brakes hard initially APPROACHING wheel lockup,
> not
> CAUSING wheel lockup.  If the back end gets loose when you brake hard
> initially, then I'd be willing to bet the wheels weren't pointed in a
> straight line - I can make the rear end get loose all day doing that.

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:24:31 -0700
From: "Darc" <wce@telus.net>
Subject: Team3S: 60k workshop -a bit OT

All;

5 of us recently meet up at Rich LeRoy's place to do my 60k. I have a 92 TT
Stealth, Dog Sled Version, produced in Oct 91, 10 years ago. Albeit I only
had a bit over 25 k on the car, many of you here on the list had admonished
that time was working against me and a timing belt change was absolutely
required when one went past 10 years, regardless of how low the  miles were
on the vehicle. So,  I finally sucked it up, bought the parts, contacted
Rich and got ready to go into my learn cycle with him as the 60k guru. At
the same time  I had Porterfield pads, cryo'd rotors and SS lines dropped
shipped to his address, along with Speed Bleeders,  so we could do that long
planned mod as well.  Rich then contacted other PNW'ers who might be
interested in a 60k workshop (translates as eat donuts, kibitz, eat pizza,
kibitz some more, get greasy, learn how Team spirit really works, and get to
know each other).

As an aside, the Ferry trip to Wash State was a search and toss job by your
boys looking for anything unusual. Talk about scrutiny!! Then it was 4 hours
of driving in the rain to get to the prefunction beer tasting contest Rich
had set up for me;-) I think we downed the last sample at around 3 am and
decided conversation had been exhausted for the night. So we crashed and
started the next...err..that's the same morning, around 9 ish.

Well the long and short of it is that all of the old parts that were
replaced (and everything in the FAQ list was replaced) were
pristine...that's as in having no discernable difference from the new parts
that replaced them. If  I had to do it again  I would not do it until  miles
dictated it. Period! The timing belt had no wear, no stretch. It was as new,
like the rest of the parts that were taken off and replaced. Yes, photos
were taken.

The timing belt installation aligned on the accurately placed chalk marks
and teeth counted to match, was likely the longest task in the whole
undertaking.  I think the 5 of us recounted and double checked each other
enough times, to use up a good two hours. The car was finally reassembled
enough by 12.30 in the morning for startup. It worked! Everyone went home.
The next day the brakes were tackled by myself and Rich alone and to our
dismay we found the (already posted) discrepancies in Speed Bleeders for the
rear,  and in one of the SS lines on each rear which was not only shorter,
but which also did not have the proper fittings. Blame it on the dog sled
version...which  also has front mounted lasers as standard equipment up here
to take care of marauding Polar Bears. Other than the aforementioned, all
went well.

Those in attendance were Erik, Glen, Adam, Rich and myself (Darc).  Perhaps
they can confirm  or alternately, give their opinion on  the need to do or
not do the 60k before it is required (low mileage, but high years). The
great thing about such events is the brain storming and double checking
which occurs. The down side is that it takes twice as long with all the
conversation. But the latter, IMHO, is also an important  part of  the
learning curve. All I need now is to figure what is causing a lower idle
after the reassembly  (I'm hoping the ECU is still learning) and get the
Speed Bleeders and SS replacement lines on.

Final note: Rich LeRoy is a Team Member and a long time admin  . They simply
do not come any better than him. Period.  I would wax eloquent on his many
merits but the old fart would never let me forget it.

Best
Darc

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 16:59:30 -0700
From: "Gross, Erik" <erik.gross@intel.com>
Subject: Team3S: Braking Techniques:  Upgraded Front Brakes, But Not Rears

Along the lines of the braking techniques discussion, I have question:

For people who are open-tracking, why do most people seem to only be
concerned with the front brakes?

I understand that the front brakes do most of the work when stopping hard,
because most of the weight is on the front of our car and even more is
transferred forward when the car dives.  However, since the rears don't come
off of the ground during a hard stop, there is *some* braking potential for
the rears.  If you put different brakes on the front, such as those with
larger pads or stickier pads (higher coefficient of friction), then they are
going to exert more braking force on the rotor at a given pedal pressure
than stock, thereby lessening the rear participation further.

Throw some round numbers in for fun...(these *aren't* accurate, just
arbitrarily chosen to illustrate my point... or misunderstanding :-)

Stock(coefficient of friction = 0.4): 
150lbs of pedal force yields 1200lbs of braking force on each front rotor
and 600lbs of braking force on each of the rear rotors.  In my pretend
world, this is the maximum force that can be exerted by the rotors and not
lock up the tires(FRONT and REAR).  The total braking force is 3600lbs (1200
+ 1200 + 600 +600).

Modified (better front pads only with coefficient of friction = 0.6):
100lbs of pedal force yields 1200lbs of braking force on each front rotor
and 400lbs of braking force on each of the rear rotors.  This is the maximum
force that can be exerted by the rotors and not lock up the FRONT tires.
The rear tires can withstand 200lbs (each) more braking force before locking
up.  The total braking force is 3200lbs (1200 + 1200 + 400 + 400).

Thus, with upgraded brakes you have less total braking force available
(although heat dissipation, thermal degradation, and fade resistance may be
improved).  Thus, you will have to use your brakes with less pedal pressure
over a longer distance to slow down by the same amount.  This would say that
upgrading the rear brakes is just as important as the fronts in order to be
able to exert the largest stopping force on the car.  What am I missing
here?  Have I simplified things too much?

On my first track day, I used R4S pads on the front and stock on the rear.
I used them as much as they'd let me all day (3 hours of track time?) and
went through a whole set of front pads.  The rears looked almost untouched.
I know I need better brake cooling and R4 pads next time(Big Reds if budget
allows), but that difference in wear is dramatic.  I wonder if I was even
using my rear brakes at the track?

So I'm thinking I should get better rear pads next time as well.  I'll have
R4 pads on the front, but I'm wondering about the rears.  I guess the rears
won't see the temperatures the fronts will, so would R4S pads be a better
option?  Do the rears stay warm enough on the track to make R4 pads useful?

Thoughts?
- --Erik

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 18:55:53 -0500
From: "Morice, Francis" <francis.morice@retek.com>
Subject: FW: Team3S: Braking With Reds

- -----Original Message-----
From: Morice, Francis
To: 'bdtrent '
Sent: 10/23/01 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braking With Reds

 To support Darren's experience with the twitchy tail under hard
braking; I have experienced this firs hand with Porterfield rotors, R4S
pads and SS brake lines. Kind of scary the first time it happened, but
you know your brakes are working.

Francis
96 RT/TT #49

- -----Original Message----
From: bdtrent
To: Team 3S
Sent: 10/23/01 6:15 PM
Subject: Team3S: Braking With Reds

I have never heard of or read any suggestion that easing into the brakes
under high perfomance driving is a preferred technique.  I hit the
brakes
hard initially and stay on them making slight adjustments to suit.
Running
big reds at the limit of ABS, I have never experienced any of the
twitchy
tail that Darren keeps refering to.  Common sense should tell you the
fastest lap is taken using max braking as late as possible.  As Keith
Code
writes in A Twist of the Wrist, the goal of any racer is to drive the
track
full on or full off.  From initial braking to track out, the tires
should be
consistently at the limit of adheasion.  This is easier said than done,
but
the goal none the less.

Regards,
DaveT/92TT

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 19:09:07 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Braking Techniques

> On the AutoX subject, the events in your (and Merritt's) neck of the
>woods must be a little different - I can't imagine a course where one lap
>was completely contained in 1/2 acre.

Sorry to say, that's the way it is here in Cedar Rapids. SCCA runs on
postage stamp lots, where it's difficult to get out of 1st gear and little
shitbox cars rule the roost. The Corvette club is my only salvation for
autocrosses, because they run on a paved halfmile oval with an inner
quarter mile oval (I was 5th fastest out of 65 cars last year).

Rich

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 20:32:14 -0400
From: "Shane Swan" <kaiou_182@hotmail.com>
Subject: Team3S: Hi All

Hello,

My name is Shane Swan, and i live in Georgia near the savannah area.  And I
own a 1992 Dodge Stealth ES, Just last weekend I put a K&N FIPK air intake
on.  If anybody knows a lot about twin turbo or knows what needs to be done
about installing one please e-mail me, because I would really like to learn.

Thank you,
Shane Swan

Kaiou_182@hotmail.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

End of Team3S: 3000GT & Stealth V1 #654
***************************************