team3s            Saturday, January 6 2001            Volume 01 : Number 369




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 09:30:49 -0800
From: Ken Middaugh <Kenneth.Middaugh@gat.com>
Subject: Team3S: Braking, was: Technical Information Manual

Jim has hit the nail on the head!  Regardless of whether 2 or 3 wheels are
being  modulated, adding too much braking force to the rear will decrease
overall stopping ability in an ABS system with 2 channels.

Only devoted track enthusiasts are going to want to mess with their brakes.
Racers will want to disable the ABS, add a front/rear brake proportioning valve,
and set the bias by making repeated stops until you find the setting with the
shortest stopping distance.

Maybe Geoff will shed some light on what he is doing for braking...

Jim Berry wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
> To: Jim Berry <fastmax@home.com>
>
> > From the TIM (p. 5-22):
> >
> > "The AWD ABS is a 4 sensor, 2 channel system and is the same as the 4
> > sensor, 3 channel system on the FWD models except for the following
> >  <clip>
> >The "select-low valve" prevents the lockup of one rear
> > wheel. "Consequently, a total of three wheels - the front or left
> > wheel and the rear right and left wheels - are controlled
> > hydraulically at the same time." (TIM, p 5-25).
> ====================================================
> Jeff
>
> The last paragraph is the one that bothers me ---- the wording is weird but
> it sounds like, if a rear wheel locks up then you lose the other rear and one
> of the fronts. If you increase the braking on the rear, bigger calipers and
> rotors, you have a much greater chance of locking up a rear wheel which
> under heavy braking probably only provides 10% to 15% of the stopping
> power. When one rear locks [15%] you lose the other rear [15%] and one
> front [35%] ----65% of your braking is being modulated even though you're
> only having trouble with 15%.
>
> That would also explain the problems Merrit had when he broke a rotor, the
> ABS system released 65% or more of his stopping power when the broken
> rotor stopped turning ---- the remaining front would overheat and lose it's
> effectiveness in a second or two.
>
> P.S.  I started reading your doctorial thesis on the vcu ---- I haven't gotten
> through the equations yet, at my age I get a headache when I think too long.
> I find it hard to believe I used to whip through that stuff ---- once in a while I'll
> look through one of my old engineering texts and marvel at how smart I was.
>
>         Jim Berry
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

- --
If you lived in your car, you'd be home by now.

Ken Middaugh (858) 455-4510
General Atomics - Fusion Group, San Diego, CA

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 09:54:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Braking, was: Technical Information Manual

I cant do anything *grin*

SCCA rules tell me the OEM ABS system must remain intact, as well as the
AWD system (torque split..etc).

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Ken Middaugh wrote:

> Jim has hit the nail on the head!  Regardless of whether 2 or 3 wheels are
> being  modulated, adding too much braking force to the rear will decrease
> overall stopping ability in an ABS system with 2 channels.
>
> Only devoted track enthusiasts are going to want to mess with their brakes.
> Racers will want to disable the ABS, add a front/rear brake proportioning valve,
> and set the bias by making repeated stops until you find the setting with the
> shortest stopping distance.
>
> Maybe Geoff will shed some light on what he is doing for braking...
>
> Jim Berry wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
> > To: Jim Berry <fastmax@home.com>
> >
> > > From the TIM (p. 5-22):
> > >
> > > "The AWD ABS is a 4 sensor, 2 channel system and is the same as the 4
> > > sensor, 3 channel system on the FWD models except for the following
> > >  <clip>
> > >The "select-low valve" prevents the lockup of one rear
> > > wheel. "Consequently, a total of three wheels - the front or left
> > > wheel and the rear right and left wheels - are controlled
> > > hydraulically at the same time." (TIM, p 5-25).
> > ====================================================
> > Jeff
> >
> > The last paragraph is the one that bothers me ---- the wording is weird but
> > it sounds like, if a rear wheel locks up then you lose the other rear and one
> > of the fronts. If you increase the braking on the rear, bigger calipers and
> > rotors, you have a much greater chance of locking up a rear wheel which
> > under heavy braking probably only provides 10% to 15% of the stopping
> > power. When one rear locks [15%] you lose the other rear [15%] and one
> > front [35%] ----65% of your braking is being modulated even though you're
> > only having trouble with 15%.
> >
> > That would also explain the problems Merrit had when he broke a rotor, the
> > ABS system released 65% or more of his stopping power when the broken
> > rotor stopped turning ---- the remaining front would overheat and lose it's
> > effectiveness in a second or two.
> >
> > P.S.  I started reading your doctorial thesis on the vcu ---- I haven't gotten
> > through the equations yet, at my age I get a headache when I think too long.
> > I find it hard to believe I used to whip through that stuff ---- once in a while I'll
> > look through one of my old engineering texts and marvel at how smart I was.
> >
> >         Jim Berry
> >
> > ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>
> --
> If you lived in your car, you'd be home by now.
>
> Ken Middaugh (858) 455-4510
> General Atomics - Fusion Group, San Diego, CA
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 12:35:14 -0600
From: "Basol, John" <jbasol@Carlson.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

How are you determining knock is present?  The IDC being 100% would not be a
true indication that knock is present.  I wouldn't concern yourself with IDC
as much as A/F ratio and EGT temps.  Matt questions about what your actually
seeing is valid.  I don't think anyone has ever said what the IDC indication
on the AVCs are in reference to.  Bottom line though is that A/F and EGT
will give you a much better idea of what is going on inside your engine than
IDC will.

John Basol
'95 RT/TT




-----Original Message-----
From: Mihai Raicu [SMTP:aa2345@wayne.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:29 PM
To: Stealth
Subject: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

Everybody,

I have a potential problem on my 95 VR4 (38,000 miles).  I monitored
and
recorded the IDC for a little bit and was shocked with what I saw.

The specs on my car are as follows:
95 Red VR4
Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter (not yet functional)
G Teck 0-60 (4.9 sec)


Test that you see was done in 2nd gear, for setting A (1 bar) @ WOT:

IDC RPM Boost
80% 3900 .92
85% 4200 .84
90% 4400 .80
95% 4800 .77
100% 5000 .77

I also did a test in 2nd gear with the APEXI in the OFF position @
WOT:

IDC RPM Boost
80% 5100 .44
85% 5300 .44
90% 5675 .44
91.5% 6200 .47

I did not run the car to redline this time, but the IDC seemed to
have been
leveling off in the 90-92% range (above 5600 RPM).

The car was not tuned for the much colder weather.  I just ran it
like it
was.  Spike was @ 1.10 bars for SETTING A.  I did not get a chance
to
reccord the IDC values for my brother's 94 TT, but he reports seeing
the
values get up to 100% even faster than in my car/at an earlier RPM
under
full throttle (visual inspection).  My conclusions on this
phenomenon are
(from what I have seen in the past on the list):

1. The injectors are truly maxed out -- engine asks for more fuel @
the
particular boost than they can deliver.
2. There is knock in the engine and the ECU feeds more fuel than is
actually
needed.

My car only has 38000 miles and I would hate to see knock already.
Is this
normal behavior?  What can I do aside from running the car @ .5
bars?  Does
this mean I need an injector upgrade (720-900cc, a better fuel pump,
and
while I'm at it I might as well go with larger turbos?  That sounds
like
almost everything.  Ouch, if that's the way I have to go.


-MIKE-          aa2345@wayne.edu
95 Red VR4
Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter

John, brother   iraicu@cs.wayne.edu
94 Pearl Yellow TT
Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter
G Teck 0-60 (4.9 sec) 1/4 mile (13.34 sec @ 112.4 mph)
Top speed after mods 169 mph

Detroit Metro Area, Michigan

PS.  I have graphs in Microsoft Excel of the data given above.  If
anyone
wants to examine them, I can send you individual e-mails with an
excel sheet
attached to the e-mail.


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 23:27:04 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl \(RTEC\)" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Cold Air Just Got Easier???

> Really?  I have seen cold air test in SCC on ~hondas~ with gains from 5 -
10
> hp from one air intake to a cold air intake.  5 - 10 hp on a Honda can be
> alot.

Unfortunately, this is within the tolerance of a dyno run and doesn't say a
lot.

>  That would be worth it to do on a NA car with our limited upgrade
> path as it is...  Didn't I hear somewhere 1 HP for every 10 degrees colder
> air intake charge or something like that?  I mean - all it would cost
would
> be some rubber tubing right?

Yes, the 1hp rule is right and why not playing the guinea pig, buy 3
thermocouples and measure the temp in the intake plenum as well as in the
air filter and outside temp. Check the difference between them and install
the ducting. Now do the same measurment again and you can then see what you
get. If the degrees are dropping in the plenum and the differences are
measurable then you can use the 1hp formula.

Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:25:12 -0500
From: "Trent" <bdtrent@netzero.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

This is a good question.  I've often questioned the accuracy of the AVC-R
IDC reading.  I've been seeing 100% IDC while running RC 500's @ 1 bar for
some time.  Otherwise, there is no indication that the injectors are
actually maxed out.  The AVC-R is wired into the injector signal to the ECU
but I don't know if its biased to show 100% at actual 85% duty cycle.  I can
run up to 1.2 bars @ 6000 at which the IDC reading has long since maxed out,
yet EGT's @ the back turbo run consistently in the 800C region.

Regards,
DaveT/92TT

> Does you AVC-R measure 100% duty cycle to mean injector open 100% full
> pulsewidth (ie: essentially switched on all the time), or 100% on display
=
> 85% pulsewidth (maximum "safe" injector firing time)?  If it means 85%
real
> pulsewidth, then 100% on the display isn't quite as bad as it sounds.
>
> -Matt
> '95 3000GT Spyder VR4




Shop Safely Online Without a Credit Card
http://www.rocketcash.com

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 14:35:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Cold Air Just Got Easier???

5-10Hp is well outside the tolerance of a well maintained dyno...that
would be a significant gain between two runs.

I rarely can point to more than a 1-2Hp deviation between runs when I
go..which is quite often as I have five performance cars to constantly
work on/upgrade/etc.

On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Roger Gerl (RTEC) wrote:

> > Really?  I have seen cold air test in SCC on ~hondas~ with gains from 5 -
> 10
> > hp from one air intake to a cold air intake.  5 - 10 hp on a Honda can be
> > alot.
>
> Unfortunately, this is within the tolerance of a dyno run and doesn't say a
> lot.
>
> >  That would be worth it to do on a NA car with our limited upgrade
> > path as it is...  Didn't I hear somewhere 1 HP for every 10 degrees colder
> > air intake charge or something like that?  I mean - all it would cost
> would
> > be some rubber tubing right?
>
> Yes, the 1hp rule is right and why not playing the guinea pig, buy 3
> thermocouples and measure the temp in the intake plenum as well as in the
> air filter and outside temp. Check the difference between them and install
> the ducting. Now do the same measurment again and you can then see what you
> get. If the degrees are dropping in the plenum and the differences are
> measurable then you can use the 1hp formula.
>
> Roger
> 93'3000GT TT
> www.rtec.ch
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 16:39:18 -0600
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

> The AVC-R is wired into the injector signal to the ECU
> but I don't know if its biased to show 100% at actual 85%
> duty cycle.  I can run up to 1.2 bars @ 6000 at which
> the IDC reading has long since maxed out, yet EGT's @ the
> back turbo run consistently in the 800C region.

That would seem to indicate that there's a safety margin built into the
S-AVC-R displayed value.  If you ran at 100% injector open time (essentially
a flat DC voltage to the injectors) then I'd say that the ECU would initiate
fuel cut, with it assuming that something is wrong (malfunctioning wastegate
or MAF sensor or something along those lines).

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:12:26 +0100
From: "Roger Gerl \(RTEC\)" <roger.gerl@bluewin.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: VR4 upgrade update..

Yes, the Buschur pulley is a real one with dampener, good thing !

But it's size looks huge, have you been able to mount it with the fender
plastic cover to the wheel or mus it be removed ?

Roger
93'3000GT TT
www.rtec.ch


> Got the Buschur pulley...man..work of art.  Photos included as well.  I
> cant belive anyone would want the "other lightweight pulley" when this
> actual functional one is available.
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 15:19:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: VR4 upgrade update..

*heh*  If you look closely on that page, you'll see theres no motor in the
car to have to worry about that *heh*

On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Roger Gerl (RTEC) wrote:

> Yes, the Buschur pulley is a real one with dampener, good thing !
>
> But it's size looks huge, have you been able to mount it with the fender
> plastic cover to the wheel or mus it be removed ?
>
> Roger
> 93'3000GT TT
> www.rtec.ch
>
>
> > Got the Buschur pulley...man..work of art.  Photos included as well.  I
> > cant belive anyone would want the "other lightweight pulley" when this
> > actual functional one is available.
> >
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 21:14:27 -0500
From: "Michael D. Crose" <ncsu4me@hotmail.com>
Subject: Team3S: Help!1 Timing belt change troubles

<html><DIV>
<DIV>This makes me nervous,&nbsp;I was taking the tensioner off the timing belt and the intake cam sprocket on the front bank of the engine moved a quarter of a turn clockwise. I&nbsp;attempted to line it back up with the timing mark on the head by turning in counter-clock wise but it has tension on it and it won't stay lined up.&nbsp; What do I do now, none of the other sprockets appeared to moved?&nbsp; It is a 1992 3000GT VR-4.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Please help,</DIV>
<DIV>Michael D. Crose</DIV></DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html>

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:22:03 -0500
From: "Mihai Raicu" <aa2345@wayne.edu>
Subject: Team3S: FW: Need suggestions on Boost controller

Rich,

>
>How hard is it to install? Are the instructions in English?
>
With regard to the Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller...The
instructions are in English, however they are not the best.  This unit was
manufactured in Japan and the instructions are probably translated.  The
unit itself is very nice esthetically, useful in terms of everything it can
do/monitor.  It has many parameters that in the end affect how well your car
is tuned.  Initially, we tuned both our cars one at a time with both of us
in the car (one driving, the other watching the values and playing/changing
parameters).  Now, if the weather changes drastically, and I see it not
holding enough boost or spiking, then I can tune it on the fly by myself.
If you understand what the parameters do, then you can tune it properly.  It
has a learning mode for each individual gear that can be enabled or
disabled.  Third gear is the optimum one to tune by and to generate a
reference curve.  Then, 1st and 2nd gears you can shift the curve up (they
will not want to hold boost as well as 3rd gear) in order to hold closer to
1 bar.  Fourth and 5th gears you shift down, because they want to hold boost
above 1 bar.  Keep in mind that this unit can have 8 adjustment points on
the RPM band in the smallest increments of 500 RPM, but you can have larger
increments also.  This meand that you can compensate for the fact that your
car behaves different in along the RPM curve (ie. -2500, 3000, 3500, 4000,
4500, 5000,6000, 6500+ RPM).

I had a tremendous help from a few people on the list.  I can compile all
the messages they sent me and send them your way.  I may even have the HOME
DEPOT receipt of the extra few little things I had to buy.  If I find it I
will scan it for you.

So, installation wise: I had help from local Detroit 3SI people.  We got
together at someone's house and my friends did the work in the engine bay
while I did the electric and installation of gauges and pod and esthetics
inside for both my car and my brothers.  It helps if you have a friend that
has the APEXI AVC-R instalation done on their car already.  Things in the
engine bay would go so fast.  There are not that many things to do, but it's
just hard to decide which hoses to cut and exactly where to place the stuff.
There is nothing like the real thing.  Once my friends did one of the cars,
the other took 1/2 hour for the engine bay installation from start to
finish.  The next best thing is pictures, and the next is TEXT.

From all the things I bought for my car, the only thing I would change now
is the AUTOMETER Manual Boost Gauge (~$60).  It reads good, but if you spend
some more $ (ie. $250) you can get an electric one with peak display, and 30
sec memory playback.  The AVC-R has a reccord and playback function, but it
is only available in the moving line graph on X & Y axis.  If you get the
gauges from the same manufacturer, they will also match better.  The Greedy
EGT Gauge looks good (Black face, indiglo display @ night).

- -MIKE-          aa2345@wayne.edu
95 Red VR4
Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter

John, brother   iraicu@cs.wayne.edu
94 Pearl Yellow TT
Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter
G Teck 0-60 (4.9 sec) 1/4 mile (13.34 sec @ 112.4 mph)
Top speed after mods 169 mph

Detroit Metro Area, Michigan


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 21:11:10 -0700
From: "Earthlink" <mprasad01@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Broken lugs

They are 5mm spacers for the front and 10 lugs.  I did not get the lug nuts.

I currently have a 3mm spacer but at hard braking the rim slightly scratches
the rotor.  I bought the 5mm spacers a few months ago but have not put them
on yet.

I am on the road and will be back home on Monday.  I will send the info on
where I got them then.

Best Regards
Moe
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Merritt" <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
To: "Earthlink" <mprasad01@earthlink.net>; "Desert Fox"
<bigfoot@simmgene.com>; "Team3S Stealth" <Team3S@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:10 PM
Subject: Re: Team3S: Broken lugs


> You can buy stock lugs at the Mitsu dealer for about $1.50 each. I carry a
> couple of spares, ever since I snapped off three studs in one year. Be
sure
> to put anti-seize compound on them. What happens, you see, is they get
> really hot from braking and then seize. Since I started using the
> anti-seize compound I haven't broken any.
>
> A>I am guessing that you might have to find
> >someone with a hydraulic press to have them taken out and the new ones
put
> >in.
>
> Nah. They pop right out after you loosen up the lower ball joint to get a
> little room.
> >
> >The only reason I am charging is because I spent $75.00 for the spacers
and
> >lugs.
>
> Moe -- is that $75 for two front spacers, 10 studs and 10 lug nuts? How
> wide a spacer? 1/2 inch? Where did you get them?
>
> Rich/old poop
>
>
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 21:34:43 -0700
From: "Earthlink" <mprasad01@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: Need suggestions on Boost controller

Thanks for the info.

I already have a K&N FIPK, and the dual pod.  I have a price of $469.95 from
www.mvpmotorsports.com. But I can't afford this yet.

It looks like there will be at least three guys buying the Boost Controller
and I am hopping that we can install all them together so we save time on
the second and third car.

What is a Greddy EGT gauge and does it come in 2 1/16" gauge?

I agree that the Boost gauge should be an electronic instead of mechanical.
I would like to buy the electronic 2 1/16" gauge but over $200 for a gauge
seems like a lot. I just may have to settle for an Auto Meter gauge.
Carparts has them for about $50 to $60.  The one I want is about $50.

I also have installed a HKS exhaust and boy it sounds great.

Happy New Year
Moe



- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mihai Raicu" <aa2345@wayne.edu>
To: <mprasad01@earthlink.net>
Cc: "Stealth" <team3s@mail.stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: Team3S: RE: Need suggestions on Boost controller


> Moe,
>
> Both myself and my brother have the new APEXI AVC-R boost controllers
> installed on our cars (95 VR4 and 94 TT).  It is a great unit, and we are
> both happy.  It reccords RPM, SPEED, BOOST, Throttle, Soleonoid, Injector
> Duty Cycle.  It has numerical gauges, analog gauges, and bar graph
displays.
> It uses fuzzy logic and it learns different gears if you so chose to.  If
> left in learning mode it will adjust to different altitudes, barometric
> pressures, and temps.  Its boost and dutyies are adjustable in increments
of
> 500 RPM(smallest increment)(real nice).  It also has a peak hold value to
> monitor the maximum values reached.  It has night and day settings for
> different light conditions that get changed automatically.
>
> Al in all, it is a very nice unit.  Go for it!  It is a bit tricky to tune
> at the beginning, but once you do it once or twice, it becomes a piece of
> cake.  Keep in mind that you will need the K&N FIPK and a reputable Boost
> Gauge (in a pod) aside from the unit.  The EGT Gauge is optional, but a
nice
> thing to have for your car's safety.
>
> Accelerated Accessories-Chris (mention 3SI)
> 301-393-8800
>
> Here are the prices I paid:
> Apexi AVC-R Actuator Valve Controller Type-R - KIT $500.00
> K&N Filter Charger Injection Performance Kit $159.00
> Autometer Boost Gauge $60.00
> Gredy EGT Gauge $163.00
> Dual Pod $30.00
> Shipping for above 5 items $20.00
> TOTAL $932.00
>
> Shop around and see if anyone can beat these prices.  It's best to get
> everything from one place though.
>
>
> -MIKE-          aa2345@wayne.edu
> 95 Red VR4
> Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
> K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter
>
> John, brother   iraicu@cs.wayne.edu
> 94 Pearl Yellow TT
> Apexi AVC-R Electronic Boost Controller
> K&N FIPK, Boost Gauge, EGT Meter
> G Teck 0-60 (4.9 sec) 1/4 mile (13.34 sec @ 112.4 mph)
> Top speed after mods 169 mph
>
> Detroit Metro Area, Michigan
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2000 21:38:09 -0700
> From: "uswest" <mprasad01@earthlink.net>
> Subject: Team3S: Need suggestions on Boost controller
>
> I am thinking about getting a boost controller.  I currently have a K&N
FIPK
> filter and HKS Turbo catback exhaust.  The next step would be a
> boost controller.
>
> I just put a new short block and can not effort to put another one in if
I
> overboost.
>
> How safe are these boost controllers? How easy are they to install and
> program? Would I need a BOV before installing the boost controller? Would
I
> need a new Y pipe or the stock Y pipe will do? My plans are not to race
this
> car but have enough power just incase it is ever needed.
>
> I have been looking at these two controllers:
>
> HKS EVC EC Electronic Valve Boost Controller.
> Apexi AVC-R Turbo Boost Controller.
>
> Please provide opinions, preference.
>
> Rgds
> Moe
>
>
> ***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***
>


***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 00:28:36 -0500
From: "Michael D. Crose" <ncsu4me@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Help!1 Timing belt change troubles

<html><P>Thank you Dave and Kevin.&nbsp; I thought I had done something that I wouldn't be able to fix.&nbsp; Horrible thoughts were going through my mind about not being able to get it back togther right and having to have it towed to a shop so they could fix my mistake.&nbsp; This makes me feel a lot better especially knowing that I am not the only one to have this happen.&nbsp; I may have to ask a few more question but hopefully I will be able to get the sprockets held in place and put the new belt on without any futher complications.</P>
<P>Thanks again guys,</P>
<P>Michael</P><br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p></html>

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 05:20:07 -0800 (PST)
From: Jeff Lucius <stealthman92@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

The ECU does not initiate fuel cut based on IDC. I have seen 100+%
IDC many times using the TMO and no fuel cut was initiated. If our
cars function as the DSM do (and the Stealth TIM indicates this),
fuel cut is initated at "overun" or 7500 RPM and during "overboost",
which means when the ECU determines that too much air is entering per
engine cycle (the "A/N" ratio) [see section 14 in the DSM TIM on
Vineet's CD for reference].

As far as knock goes, the ECU will dump fuel in response to very high
knock values; I and others have observed this with the TMO. Of
course, 100% IDC does not automatically mean knock is present.
Likewise, 800ºC EGT or "rich" A/F values also does do not exclude
knock.

Since the 1995 owners can't use the TMO, maybe it is worth taking a
look at the spark plugs for signs of detonation plus rich or lean
conditions. Remember, just because the average EGT or A/F is OK does
not mean there is not a problem in one cylinder. Instructions for
getting to the spark plugs are on the Garage Page at my web site. You
will want to use a magnifying lens (a geologist's 10X hand lens work
nicely) to look for very-small specks of aluminum on the ceramic or
metal, plus of course physical damage or deterioration.

As others have warned, and as I am beginning to sound like a broken
record, you cannot always hear the knock that is damaging your
engine. Running high boost levels with a stock fuel system (an no WI)
always increases the probability of (silent) knock.

Jeff Lucius, www.stealth316.com

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jannusch, Matt" <mjannusch@marketwatch.com>
To: "Team 3S" <team3s@stealth-3000gt.st>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Injector Duty Cycle @ 100%!!!!

> The AVC-R is wired into the injector signal to the ECU
> but I don't know if its biased to show 100% at actual 85%
> duty cycle.  I can run up to 1.2 bars @ 6000 at which
> the IDC reading has long since maxed out, yet EGT's @ the
> back turbo run consistently in the 800C region.

That would seem to indicate that there's a safety margin built into
the S-AVC-R displayed value.  If you ran at 100% injector open time
(essentially a flat DC voltage to the injectors) then I'd say that
the ECU would initiate fuel cut, with it assuming that something is
wrong (malfunctioning wastegate or MAF sensor or something along
those lines).

- -Matt
'95 3000GT Spyder VR4


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 14:28:46 -0800
From: "noble" <nketo@sympatico.ca>
Subject: Team3S: Re: Oil in intake

I have a question regarding where the oil breather lines hook up to the
intake tracts.

I currently have 3 sections off the car, and was wondering if anyone can
confirm which of
these is the oil breather line (I'll hook up a catch can later)

1)Near the front turbo, turbo rubber intake hose (bigger)
2)Near the rear turbo, turbo rubber intake hose (smaller diameter hose)
3)Nearest the BOV (kinda underneath)

Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Noble




***  Info:  http://www.Team3S.com/Rules.htm  ***

------------------------------

End of team3s V1 #369
*********************