--

From: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com (Team3S Digest)
To: stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Subject: Team3S Digest V1 #265
Reply-To: stealth-3000gt
Sender: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Errors-To: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Precedence: bulk


Team3S Digest         Tuesday, August 24 1999         Volume 01 : Number 265




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:01:10 -0500
From: Merritt <merritt@cedar-rapids.net>
Subject: Team3S: Blackhawk Farms Drivers School

Went to a BMW driver's school at Blackhawk Farms this weekend.

Highlights:
1. For the first event yet, the Old Poop Brake Shop was closed for the
weekend. Porterfields work!
2. When ya move up a class, the competition gets tough
3. BMWs are fine racecars.

A LAP OF BLACKHAWK FARMS

It's 1.9 miles through the trees, with some scary places. The only place to
relax is on the front straight, because it's the only place that's
straight. Everything else is a series of linked turns, and you are very,
very busy. It is NOT a horsepower track, although it helps. Tires,
handling, and keeping your speed up is vital.  I ran the entire thing in
3rd gear, never shifting.

Turn 1 is at the end of a 3/8 mile straight. I  hit 110 just before 1 if I
got a good launch onto the straight, 100 otherwise.
Bang on the brakes, then a very late apex right into turn 1. It's a 90-deg
right, taken in a nice continuous arc.

Turn 2 is a gentle bend to the left, taken flat out at about 80. Big pucker
factor the first few times you do this, then it gets to be second nature.
The VR4 is pulling hard in 3rd gear through here, so it makes up lots of
ground on slower cars or those who brake for 2.

It's flat out from the apex of turn 1 to the braking point for turn 3.
We're doing about 90 before braking for 3.

Brake for Turn 3, a carousel (continuous-radius turn) to the right. Take
this in the middle of the track, stay at a constant speed half way around
at about 45, then hard on the throttle at the exit, clip the inside curb at
3A (left) then hard on the brakes for 3B (right).

There is no correct line through this 3a-3b S-turn -- all you really want
to do is get properly set up for the exit of 4.

Turn 4 is a left- left, and you must tap the brakes slightly at the exit to
set the suspension, or you slide into the concrete wall, 20 ft beyond the
turn.

Late apex into the entry of 4 (left), tap brakes then flat at the exit of 4
(left) and keep it flat out all the way to 6.

Turn five is an increasing-radius left. You come out of 4 at about 65,
accelerate to the very, very late apex of 5, grit your teeth, pucker up,
hold the turn-in to the last possible microsecond, clip the apex on the
left, and let the car drift to the right, all the way to edge of the track,
at about 95 mph. Keep it flat, start easing back to the left to set up for
6, a right. At about 105,  bang on the brakes. If you take 5 correctly, you
get an adrenelin rush you would not believe! Omigawd! I did it!

If you turn in a teeny bit too early, you run out of track at 95 mph, and
take a wild ride through the grass. This involves getting all four wheels
about 3 ft in the air whilst flying over some grassy bumps, mowing down the
grass, and ripping off brake ducts. Your humble narrator has personal
experience with such an adventure.

Only once, though. I did manage to eventually find the correct turn in point.

But I digress.

Hard on the brakes at 6, late apex to a right-right, then down the back
straight to 7, another right. About 150 yards from 7 is a slight kink to
the right, taken at 100. Don't lift, just flat though the kink, wait til
the car stops sliding and is  straight again, then bang on the brakes, late
apex, clip the concrete curb at the exit, then down the front straight,
heading for 1 again. That's a lap of Blackhawk Farms.

There is some discussion as to where the fastest point on the track is --
some say it's the end of the straight at 1, others say it's the entrance to
6, and others say it's 7. All I can say is, the only time I could actually
watch the speedo when entering a turn is at 1, because it's the end of a
straight straightaway. Too much is going on at the entries to 6 and 7 to
watch, although I did see 95 and 100, respectively, at various points prior
to those turns. Believe me, you do not want to look down at the speedo
prior to braking at either turn. 

ABOUT THE BRAKES
For this event, I ran Porterfield rotors and R4 race pads. We put the pads
on prior to the event, and drove there (about  180 miles) on the pads.

My infamous brake ducts were partially inoperable. While driving on the
street, one duct caught on something, ripped off the hose, and wrapped the
hose around the CV joint, tearing the boot. Just prior to the event, I had
to have the boot replaced, and never had time to put the hose back on. On
the right side, the hose had pulled out of the front scoop, and was just
hanging there. It was still connected to the caliper, but its inlet was no
longer in the scoop. It was just stuffed up inside the front valence. My
intent was to use some time between runs to re-install the hoses. Never got
to do this.

Nevertheless, for the first time ever, the pads did not fade. At the end of
each session, I still had brakes! This involved bringing it down from 100
or near-100 mph speeds to about 40 mph at least four times per lap (at 1,
3, 6 and 7), plus a coupla places where you just stab it good (3b and 4).

During my third session, when I did some agricultural driving across the
field, the grass ripped off the brake scoops, so my plans to fix the hoses
went south.

Next day, I ran the first session, then pulled the right front wheel to
inspect the pads up close and personal. They looked like they would last
the entire weekend. Unfortunately, I pulled the wrong wheel. As it turned
out, the right wheel (the one that had some air cooling for a while) was
just fine. Unknown to me, the uncooled left side was wearing much faster.
At the end of the second session, I pulled the left wheel and saw that the
pads were down to the backing, and the rotor was scored. I packed up and
went home. I didn't want to replace both front rotors and install stock
pads just to run two more sessions.

Lesson: With air ducting, I think a set of Porterfields will last an entire
weekend. I'll have that back on by the next event at Road America in October.

THE COMPETITION

As I predicted, competition in higher classes is tougher. This was a BMW
club event, and there were some very nasty cars driven by experienced
dudes. They put little decals in their rear windows -- very subtle, these
Bimmer people -- that say stuff like Dinan, Brembo, and such as that. Since
Blackhawk is not a horsepower track, it was tough to use the superior power
of the VR4, so these Beemers were tough to catch. For example, it's very
difficult to make up ground on an M3 from 1 to 3 or 4 to 6, where both of
us are flatout all the way through there. I could catch cars from 6 to 7 or
7 to 1, but that was the only place where HP made a significant difference.

There was an AWD Eclipse and an Eagle Talon in my class, each with a bigger
turbo and intercooler,  boost controller, and sticky tires. One said he was
running about 325 HP with his 2700 lb car. I could pass either, albeit with
great difficulty. I got the Talon because he lifted at 2 and 5, but I think
the Eclipse only let me by just so he could follow me for a while. We were
basically dead even everywhere on the track. I had some trouble getting by
a lowly Neon, equipped with the performance package from Chrysler (brakes,
suspension, balanced and blueprinted engine). It took me several laps to
get by, mainly because he was actually a little faster than I was from 1-3.
(How do they do that?) What an amazing little car!

My son sent me an account (similar to this narrative) on how to drive
Blackhawk in a Fiero, written by an autocrosser, and it's amazing how his
speeds and mine are so similar. It means that handling is far more
important here than horsepower.

I got all the 318s, 325s, miscellaneous unknown BMWs, and Audis in my
group, but never encountered the two corvettes and a carrera. I never did
get one badass M3, but I did catch him once.

It was a good weekend. The car is starting to get right! Rear pads, Ground
Control springs and the bleeder valve are next. 

Rich/old poop/94 VR4
Porterfield cryogenically treated rotors.
Porterfield R4 race pads
Brake ducts (sometimes)
Yokohama 032R race tires
K&N







For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Baldwin <mbaldwin@eecs.tufts.edu>
Subject: Team3S: Digest archives

Can someone let me know how I can access these archives? Are they
searchable?

Also, would it be possible for me to download the archives onto my
computer and read them at my own leisure?

Thanks

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 08:08:00 -0600
From: "Jeffrey Young" <jefyoung@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Team3S: Polishing

For those people who are interested in having your valve cover or plenum
polished, but do not want your car out of commission during the polishing
and shipping time, below is a salvage yard that has some used valve covers
and a plenum for sale.  If your interested, buy the used part and ship it to
me for polishing.   See http://www.omega-sw.com/stealth/fu00005.htm
for more information on polishing.


Jeffrey
92 RT/Turbo
www.omega-sw.com/stealth/fu

Hello Jeffrey:
For the upper plenum it would be $250.00. if interested please give Rob a
call at a 800 255 6656 thanks

Hello Jeffrey...In reply to your request for parts, on the valve covers, we
have 1 set of 1991 and 1 set of 1993,for a total in stock, of 4, our price
is $80.00 each, plus $10.00 shipping on each.  We also have 1 1991 plenum,
(upper and lower) for a total of $500.00 plus $30.00 for shipping.  You can
contact Rob at 1-800-255-6656
and let me know if you are interested.  Thank you for contacting us.



For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:22:16 -0400
From: "Carlos Q" <pir8ska@shadow.net>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Safe Boost?

Actually, 1.0 bar is 14.7 psi....

=)
Carlos

- -----Original Message-----
From: Chris Winkley <cwinkley@plaza.ds.adp.com>
To: 'syzygy@webzone.net' <syzygy@webzone.net>;
stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com <stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com>
Date: Sunday, August 22, 1999 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: Team3S: Safe Boost?


>15 psi (1.0 bar)
>
>Looking forward...Chris
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: syzygy@webzone.net [mailto:syzygy@webzone.net]
>Sent: Sunday, August 22, 1999 4:03 AM
>To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
>Subject: Team3S: Safe Boost?
>
>
>What is the max boost you can SAFELY run on stock ingectors, fuel map, etc?
>I
>am considering upgraded turbos and need to know how far I can go without
>messing
>with too much else. Only current mods on the car is K&N Drop In and 3" Cat
>Back
>exhaust (no mufflers). I will get a boost controller when I upgrade the
>turbos.
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>Nissa
>95 VR-4
>
>BTW. I am looking to buy an 'economy' car for my move to California... my
>VR-4
>isn't exactly fuel efficient and since it has low miles I want to keep it
>that
>way. So, I was looking at V6 Camry's yesterday and realized how spoiled I
>really
>am! It is really hard to get excited about a car that isn't at least 300hp!
> If anyone has been through this delima and gotten a fuel efficient (and
>somewhat
>powerful) daily driver please e-mail me privately and let me know what you
>use...
>Thanks again!
>
>Don't mess in the affairs of dragons.
>For you are crunchy and go good with ketchup.
>For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
>http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm
>For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:09:42 -0400
From: "Johnson, Scott  (CAP, ITS, CA)" <Scott.Johnson@gects.ge.com>
Subject: Team3S: How-to work in a new clutch...  Suggestions

Hi guys,
 
After living with an irritating (and getting progressively worse) "clutch
chatter" for the last month, I'm finally getting a new clutch installed in
my Stealth R/T TT.
 
I'd like to ask you all what you feel is the best way to break in a new
clutch? (techniques, time required, etc.)
 
Thanks
Scott
 
1993 R/T TT
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:27:52 -0700
From: "Bob Forrest" <bf@bobforrest.com>
Subject: Team3S: Admin:  The Archive Page is back On-Line.

To all:

The Archive Page is back On-Line, and can be accessed through the main
Team3S Page, or directly at:

www.bobforrest.com/Team3S-Archive.htm

Our list software (Majordomo) automatically stores our files on a
monthly basis, as zip files.  When you send a request for an archive
file, it is returned to you almost immediately by the software.  The
files vary in size, ranging from 100k to 500k.  They are searchable
using the search facilities in the WinZip software.

Please let me know if there are any problems accessing the Archive
Page or any of the archive files.

Thank you.

Bob Forrest
Admin, Team3S


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 17:04:21 CDT
From: "Curt Gendron" <curt_gendron@hotmail.com>
Subject: Team3S: horsepower calculations

Hey everyone,

I used my G-tech Pro over the weekend to take some horsepower readings at
different levels of boost.  I thought you might want to see what water
injection can do.  :)  I've got all the data at this link: 
http://mn3s.org/horsepower.html

Enjoy,
Curt,
95 R/T TT --> 13.11 @ 105.9 mph
96 GSX --> 14.49 @ 92.9 mph
and author of Minnesota 3/S at: http://www.mn3s.org


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:43 +0200
From: "R.G." <robby@freesurf.ch>
Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations

Thanks for the calculations !

It's very interesting how the real and the math world works together :

My injector calculation sheet shows 414hp for 360cc at 18 psi of boost and
an IDC of about 95%. 100% IDC means 436hp and therefore your car still runs
on the safe side.

With 550cc you'd be able to produce 500hp at 18psi if the WI system is still
able to control detonation ... and I think so :)

BTW, my y-pipe popped off again and my rubber seal broke totally apart. GT
PRO is creating an aluminum one for me asap because I'm not able to go over
10psi without popping off the pipe (glued the rubber to the pipe). Time to
do a good break job now :(

Roger
93'3000GT TT

>I used my G-tech Pro over the weekend to take some horsepower readings at
>different levels of boost.  I thought you might want to see what water
>injection can do.  :)  I've got all the data at this link:
>http://mn3s.org/horsepower.html



For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:07:54 -0700
From: Ken Middaugh <Kenneth.Middaugh@gat.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations

Hi Curt,

Nice measurements!

> I used my G-tech Pro over the weekend to take some horsepower readings at
> different levels of boost.  I thought you might want to see what water
> injection can do.  :)  I've got all the data at this link:
> http://mn3s.org/horsepower.html

The multiplication factor you are using appears to be too low.  According to
Roger et al's dyno test in Feb, a 2nd gen with 18" wheels & 6 speed have about a
29.55% loss.  Thus the wheel to flywheel multiplication factor should be: 1 / (1
- - .2955) = 1.419!  (I too have a hard time believeing this multiplication
factor, but that is what I calculate from the info that Roger has previously
posted, see includes).

From include 1, Rogers car shows a drivetrain loss of 27.85%.  This gives a
wheel to flywheel multiplication factor of 1 / ( 1 . 0.2785 ) = 1.386.  Using
figures from include 2 you can verify the factor as such:  1.386 * 188.0 =
260.56, and 261.5 * .2785 = 72.83.

Also, you  can correct for altitude using this formula posted by Jeffrey Young:
Corrected HP = Actual HP * ((Altitude / 1000 * .042)+1)

Using this formula and multiplication factor, I calculate HP values that seem to
be higher than I expect (do my bleeder valve at 15psi & FIPK really give me
418HP on my '91 VR4??).  Perhaps someone can correct me if my logic isn't
correct.  Also, I guess results really depend on the weight entered on the
G-Tech Pro (the higher the weight, the more optimistic the result) and the
accuracy of it's setup & measurement.  My current suspicion is that the G-Tech
Pro gives optimistic (even if fairly consistent) results.

Happy water injecting,
Ken

- ---- Include 1 -------

> Thanks for the update Roger.  I found it interesting that there appears to
> be a loss of about 30% in HP from the flywheel to the wheels.  I always
> thought that it was more like a 20% loss.

Mikes loss was 29.55% (18", 6-Speed), Jims 29.88% (17", 6-Speed) and mine 27.85%
(17", 5-speed). The figures before the rebuild showed a huge loss of 34.5% on
mine but I can't say where this came from.

> HP using the G-Tech and if so how close to those results were the dyno
> numbers?

I got around 254hp with the G-Tech. If these are wheel hp then this is around
397 SAE hp calculated with the loss and the correction. This sounds pretty
accurate to my measurments but I'll redo this when I'm getting the thing back
from my Supra friend ! BTW, his automatic Supra TT had a loss of 21%


- ---- Include 2 -------

Of course, each car has its own drivetrain loss (tranny oil ??). As mine is a
5-speed with 17" here are the figures written on my sheet :

P-Wheel  : 188.0kW (252hp)
P-Loss   :  73.5kW (98.7hp)
P-Engine : 261.5kW (350.7hp, uncorrected)

Now the figure has to be SAE corrected and this can not only be done by a
multiplication as the dyno does this upon the measured figures. Don't ask me
what it does (Wayne ?)

For the G-Tech figures the following page gives a good explanation how to
calculate Flywheel hp :
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/9190/g-tech.html

It works very well for manual rear/front wheel driven cars but I'm not sure
about automatics or AWD.

Hope this helps. I'll check out with the G-Tech when the Supra guy ends playing
with it :)

- ----
I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe.

Ken Middaugh (858) 455-4510
General Atomics
San Diego
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 19:48:13 CDT
From: "Curt Gendron" <curt_gendron@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations

Hey everyone,

I'm glad I'm not getting too shot down for my calculations. ;)  Yes, Roger
it is good to see the numbers come close to yours.  I didn't even now you
came up with those numbers.  But, remember I was using a 20% drivetrain
loss.  If our cars truly do lose 29% through the drivetrain, it doesn't do
much good quoting those numbers to people, because it over inflates the
abilities of our cars.  I feel comfortalbe telling people my car is putting
out 410 hp at the flywheel, with water injection.  Now if I could just get
decent times at the track to back that up.  My best is 13.11 with water
injection. :(

One other discovery I made on Friday that might be of use to people.  I
learned that if you buy the 1g DSM BOV with the adapter to fit onto a 2G
DSM, it will fit the 3/S too.  I own a 96 GSX and a Stealth.  You should of
seen the look on my girlfriend's face when I walked up stairs with a 3/S BOV
in one hand and a 2G DSM BOV in the other and said, "see honey, they are
interchangeable."  But the 2G DSM BOV is all plastic and leaks bad.  I
bought the 1G DSM BOV and adapter today, for the Stealth, and the Stealth
BOV will probably make its way into the Eclipse.

later,
Curt
http://www.mn3s.org



>From: "R.G." <robby@freesurf.ch>
>To: <stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com>
>Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations
>Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:43 +0200
>
>Thanks for the calculations !
>
>It's very interesting how the real and the math world works together :
>
>My injector calculation sheet shows 414hp for 360cc at 18 psi of boost and
>an IDC of about 95%. 100% IDC means 436hp and therefore your car still runs
>on the safe side.
>
>With 550cc you'd be able to produce 500hp at 18psi if the WI system is
>still
>able to control detonation ... and I think so :)
>
>BTW, my y-pipe popped off again and my rubber seal broke totally apart. GT
>PRO is creating an aluminum one for me asap because I'm not able to go over
>10psi without popping off the pipe (glued the rubber to the pipe). Time to
>do a good break job now :(
>
>Roger
>93'3000GT TT
>
> >I used my G-tech Pro over the weekend to take some horsepower readings at
> >different levels of boost.  I thought you might want to see what water
> >injection can do.  :)  I've got all the data at this link:
> >http://mn3s.org/horsepower.html
>
>
>
>For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
>http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm


_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 20:28:25 -0500
From: "Jeff" <spydervr4@home.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations

I've used a 1g DSM BOV on my Spyder for quite some time now.  The only
problem is, it doesn't have a 90 degree bend in the bottom like the 3000GT
BOV so it doesn't sit quite right.  5th gear and sometimes 3rd gear bump the
BOV and it's noticible in the shifter.  To get into 5th I have to really
push.  Did you have this same problem?  I trimmed the hose that goes to the
Y pipe to try to pull it out of the way of the shifter and it helped a bit,
but still isn't quite perfect.

jeff
'95 Mitsubishi Spyder VR-4
'90 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Curt Gendron <curt_gendron@hotmail.com>
To: <stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com>
Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 7:48 PM
Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations


> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm glad I'm not getting too shot down for my calculations. ;)  Yes, Roger
> it is good to see the numbers come close to yours.  I didn't even now you
> came up with those numbers.  But, remember I was using a 20% drivetrain
> loss.  If our cars truly do lose 29% through the drivetrain, it doesn't do
> much good quoting those numbers to people, because it over inflates the
> abilities of our cars.  I feel comfortalbe telling people my car is
putting
> out 410 hp at the flywheel, with water injection.  Now if I could just get
> decent times at the track to back that up.  My best is 13.11 with water
> injection. :(
>
> One other discovery I made on Friday that might be of use to people.  I
> learned that if you buy the 1g DSM BOV with the adapter to fit onto a 2G
> DSM, it will fit the 3/S too.  I own a 96 GSX and a Stealth.  You should
of
> seen the look on my girlfriend's face when I walked up stairs with a 3/S
BOV
> in one hand and a 2G DSM BOV in the other and said, "see honey, they are
> interchangeable."  But the 2G DSM BOV is all plastic and leaks bad.  I
> bought the 1G DSM BOV and adapter today, for the Stealth, and the Stealth
> BOV will probably make its way into the Eclipse.
>
> later,
> Curt
> http://www.mn3s.org
>
>
>
> >From: "R.G." <robby@freesurf.ch>
> >To: <stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com>
> >Subject: Re: Team3S: horsepower calculations
> >Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:38:43 +0200
> >
> >Thanks for the calculations !
> >
> >It's very interesting how the real and the math world works together :
> >
> >My injector calculation sheet shows 414hp for 360cc at 18 psi of boost
and
> >an IDC of about 95%. 100% IDC means 436hp and therefore your car still
runs
> >on the safe side.
> >
> >With 550cc you'd be able to produce 500hp at 18psi if the WI system is
> >still
> >able to control detonation ... and I think so :)
> >
> >BTW, my y-pipe popped off again and my rubber seal broke totally apart.
GT
> >PRO is creating an aluminum one for me asap because I'm not able to go
over
> >10psi without popping off the pipe (glued the rubber to the pipe). Time
to
> >do a good break job now :(
> >
> >Roger
> >93'3000GT TT
> >
> > >I used my G-tech Pro over the weekend to take some horsepower readings
at
> > >different levels of boost.  I thought you might want to see what water
> > >injection can do.  :)  I've got all the data at this link:
> > >http://mn3s.org/horsepower.html
> >
> >
> >
> >For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
> >http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
> For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:29:34 +0200
From: lehir@genesiscom.ch (Genesiscon Lehir)
Subject: RE: Team3S: horsepower calculations

Some food for thoughts

>>The multiplication factor you are using appears to be too low.  According
to
>>Roger et al's dyno test in Feb, a 2nd gen with 18" wheels & 6 speed have
about a
>>29.55% loss.  Thus the wheel to flywheel multiplication factor should be:
1 / (1
>>- .2955) = 1.419!  (I too have a hard time believeing this multiplication
>>factor, but that is what I calculate from the info that Roger has
previously
>>posted, see includes).

I don't see why the drivetrain horsepower loss is a PERCENTAGE of the POWER
generated by the engine.

I agree that it would fluctuate a little (caused by increased friction), but
not that much.

If the value is given as a percentage of the STOCK horsepower, I would
agree.....but a drivetrain loss
that is a DIRECT function of the power generated......doesn't compute right.

I know as a fact that in a TTZ, the drivetrains loss is about 20% of the
STOCK horsepower (300 HP), but stays the same when you increase the power
output up to 550 HP....and I don't really see WHY my Stealth, even if it's
an AWD, should be different.

Any ideas ??

Henri

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

End of Team3S Digest V1 #265
****************************

For unsubscribe info and FAQ, see our web page at http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm