--

From: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com (Team3S Digest)
To: stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Subject: Team3S Digest V1 #6
Reply-To: stealth-3000gt
Sender: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Errors-To: owner-stealth-3000gt-digest@list.sirius.com
Precedence: bulk


Team3S Digest        Saturday, October 24 1998        Volume 01 : Number 006




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 17:29:26 -0400
From: josesini <josesini@engin.umich.edu>
Subject: Team3S: Re: Clutch (was: ...and AMG S60 race)

Mikael,

I was in the same position you're now, and here's what I found out about
clutches in the last 6 months...

RPS - The new Kevlar one "sounds very good on paper" (I'm quoting some
one here and he knows who he is.) big problem is it never was released.
I actually had one in my hands and before I got to install it I received
an EMERGENCY call from RPS telling me that they were recalling the unit
due to some faulty materials.  So I returned it and started looking for
another solution.... :(
The current RPS clutch I've heard too many times how it just shattered
during a launch!

Centerforce - I think this one is a good one but not sure how long it
will last given more than 450 HP.  So if that's all you want this is a
good choice.  Just have to be careful with the break-in period.

ClutchMasters - I've heard of only one 3S customer where they have
failed.  I'm not sure if it was stage II or III.  But as far as DSM
people, they have failed or died prematurely in a few occasions.  A
little bit overpriced too.  But according to Henry (I believe) this
clutch has worked great on his 3S car.  I think certain stages (the
lower ones in particular) are the ones that fail.  So in MHO, I think
this is an OK company if you go with the most aggressive stage.

ACT - I have not heard from anyone with a 3S car that has installed it,
but as far as the DSMs go, this is the clutch to go with.  They have 2
different disks.  A street disk with springs and some sort of carbon or
organic material that will hold in the 400+ (I can't remember the exact
number) foot-pounds of torque.  This is with a 2600 lb pressure plate.
They also have their racing disk - solid (no springs) and with a six -
puck design with copper/ceramic pads.  They claimed that it will hold up
to 584 ft-lb of torque with the 2600 lb pressure plate.   This is what
I'm installing on mine as soon as my transmission is finished.  I'll let
you know sometime in the next two weeks (hopefully!) how this clutch
turns out to be.

I hope this helps...

Jose



Mikael Åkesson wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> My clutch have now started to slip after only 10000 miles.
>
> I planned to buy a new one from Centerforce or Clutchmaster. Chien (nexus) told me that the clutchmaster stage 3 will hold for more miles than the Centerforce.
>
><SNIP>
> BUT I have deceided to go with a custom solution. I will use a cinter (not sure about the word but it's non organic) disc from a ford (cosworth) that have the same spline size. I will use the stock preasure plate. The flywheel will be resurfaced and the preasure plate will be flat grinded.
><SNIP>
> BTW our preasure plates press 1200kg and that is very very much. That kind of preasure shall hold 700hp with a good disc !!!
>
><SNIP>
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:47:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Dennis Moore <stealth@kiva.net>
Subject: Team3S: Another Clutch Question

Aside from the obvious signs of slippage, like 5mph@6000RPM in first gear,
what other clues will your clutch give you that it might be going.  For a
long time, I've suspected my clutch may be on its last legs, but I haven't
had the big death clue (like mentioned above).  How do I know if my clutch
is still kosher?

Dennis Moore
stealth@kiva.net

There are two kinds of ocean-going vessels in this world:
submarines and targets!


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:20:57 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: Team3S: RE: Clutch (sepcifically new RPS)

I have the latest verion of the RPS kevlar clutch in a box.  This new
version is the final version (barring any new problems) which supposedly
will be available to the general public.

It looks good in real life.  It is also very light which should make it
easier on the synchros.

The week old version shipped to me is supposedly one generation beyond the
clutch currently in the RPS 700 RWHP Supra TT which uses the same diameter
friction plate.  According to Rob Smith, it was tested by an independant
friction materials testing laboratory on the East coast.  According to them
it was "the best they had ever tested" in terms of grip and wear including
ceramic, semi-metallic, full metal and more conventional materials.  Real
world longevity is, of course, yet to be proven since it is a brand new
product.

60' times on the Supra were consistent 1.5 with no top end slip.  That's on
a 700 HP RWD car with wrinkle wall slicks squeezing 100 shot of nitrous out
of the hole.  We'll see how it holds up to the demands of AWD with more than
a few HP behind it.

Supposedly it is slippable without fading and actually gains grip with heat.
This characteristic is not unlike the clutches I used on my race bikes.
Again, we'll see how it works on the street.

I have destroyed two of the old conventional style RPS clutches and I do not
consider myself inherently hard on clutches.  I think RPS pressure plates
are great.  Their earlier friction plates were fabricated by ACT.  I do not
believe they were ever intended to handle in excess of 500 HP.  I bet they
work great and last a long time at more moderate power levels.  The old ones
were definitely well behaved so long as you didn't smoke them.  Even if you
did they would eventually come back.

This new clutch is very promising, on paper, and according to Rob's results
after several months of testing.

Now if only I had a running car in which to test it we could see if it
stands up to the claims :\


Barry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of josesini
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 1998 2:29 PM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Team3S: Re: Clutch (was: ...and AMG S60 race)
>
>
> Mikael,

<snip>


> RPS - The new Kevlar one "sounds very good on paper" (I'm quoting some
> one here and he knows who he is.) big problem is it never was released.
> I actually had one in my hands and before I got to install it I received
> an EMERGENCY call from RPS telling me that they were recalling the unit
> due to some faulty materials.  So I returned it and started looking for
> another solution.... :(
> The current RPS clutch I've heard too many times how it just shattered
> during a launch!


<snip>

>
> I hope this helps...
>
> Jose

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:31:47 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Team3S: Engine Cooling

Jeffrey Young wrote:

> Since I have replaced my fog lights with some PIAA 1400, I now have space in
> the fog light openings to see if I can route some air into the engine
> compartment.    This will be in conjunction with the Bozz Speed bonnet
> scoops, that I have already installed.
>

Good deal...let us know how this goes, and if you notice a drop in engine compartment
temperature. Are you just leaving the fog lamp openings as is, or do you plan on routing
the air??

Darc

92 Stealth TT

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:52:52 -0600
From: "Jeffrey Young" <jefyoung@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Engine Cooling

I am "planning" on using a small amount of ducting to deflect the air upward
into the compartment.  We'll see how well it works.  As it is now, I'm sure
the majority of the additional air flow is deflected back down towards the
ground, considering the proximity of the openings.

I have noticed a fair amount of heat radiating out from the bonnet scoops
after a hard run.  Assuming that the design of the scoops allows for
additional heat to be drawn out by the airflow over the top of the scoops,
the introduction of more air (from the fog openings) should increase this
venting process.

Jeffrey
92 RT/Turbo
www.omega-sw.com/stealth

>
>Good deal...let us know how this goes, and if you notice a drop in engine
compartment
>temperature. Are you just leaving the fog lamp openings as is, or do you
plan on routing
>the air??
>
>Darc
>
>92 Stealth TT


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:48:30 -0700
From: Dave Allison <dave@languys.com>
Subject: Team3S: Dynoing the AWD 3000GT/Stealth

Many of you have been just as frustrated as I when it comes to adding
upgrades to our cars and having to judge the performance by "seat of the
pants" feedback. Unless you live in Switzerland where they seem to have
more AWD dyno's than they do 7-11's in the States (hiya Roger!), you're
kinda S.O.L.

The G-Tech Pro is a nice unit and it gives you a ballpark figure of
horsepower, but it does not produce a dyno chart of torque and horsepower.
So I found myself looking for some way to peek behind the curtain and get
an idea of what was happening to the performance of my engine.

I think I found it.

Some of you may raise an eyebrow, but trust me, it works. Besides, if
you've got nothing... then something is better than nothing! :) I ran
across this item while doing keyword searches on the Internet. It's called
the, "Home Dyno". I know... stupid name. But it really works. What a
standard chassis dynamometer is is basically a device that applies a
specified load to the engine via drums beneath the wheels and a inductive
pickup which attatches to the spark plug wire to measure the work being
performed by the engine under these loaded conditions.

Home Dyno substitutes the weight of your car for the drums under you
wheels. It factors in the work required to move the weight of your car,
drive axle ratio, test gear ratio, tire aspect, tire diameter, drag
coefficient, drivetrain loss, frontal area, and even the barometric
pressure, temperature, and relative humidity for those who love to brag
about their "corrected times". :)

The way it works is you connect the supplied inductive pickup to a spark
plug wire and run the other end of the wire into the cabin where the cable
terminates in a 1/8" jack. This end you plug into either a microcassete
recorder, minidisc recorder, or (with an adapter) a camcorder. I'd
recommend the camcorder or minidisc recorder, since there are no issies
with playback vs. recording speed. Then you find yourself a nice stretch of
road and ease the car into 2nd gear, creeping along with no gas applied.
Hit record and hit the gas. Take the car up to redline and perhaps even the
rev limiter. Slow down and hit stop. Connect the recorder to the line in on
your PC's soundcard and record it as a WAV file. once the run is recorded
as a WAV file, it is up to Home Dyno to analyze the signal. With a few
mods, HKS exhaust & HKS Super Power Flo intake, I got this:

http://www.languys.com/dave/336hp.jpg

Not bad, eh? Actually it's within 1HP of what HKS predicts with these two
items fitted to the car. Here's the specs I plugged in during the analysis
portion. The drivetrain loss is taken from Roger Gerl's observations during
actual AWD dynoing in Europe. The rest of the numbers are from the
Mitsubishi service manuals.

http://www.languys.com/dave/336chart.jpg

I think it's a great way to get more definitive feedback on what each
performance mod does to the power of the car. Makes it feel a bit better to
drop a $1000 for an item if you can see the results on paper. If anyone has
any questions, feel free to send me some private mail and I'll try my best
to answer them all.

Seeyaz!

Dave Allison

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:36:40 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Dynoing the AWD 3000GT/Stealth

Excellent information Dave.

I saw this setup a while back.  There's no reason it shouldn't be accurate
given correct inputs as you appear to have done.  Cool idea.  One of those
"Gee, I shoulda...".

Anyway, another approach is to record the ignition on any high quality
recording device.  A digital or conventional camcorder ideally with PCM
sound quality works great too.  That way you avoid having to lug a PC around
in your car.  Same steps as you describe except record to tape and playback
the tape to the PC to create the WAV file.

Here's the link:  http://www.charm.net/~mchaney/homedyno/dynokit.htm

More interesting home brew dyno projects are out there too.  Here's one
more: http://crash.ihug.co.nz/~geoff/dyno.htm

There's a guy in England who given your specifications will design rollers
and plans for your application.  You'd then get the drums built
professionally and go from there.  For $1000-2000 plus some software and
computer equipment you could have your very own inertia dyno.

Someone else was trying out a driveshaft dyno.  Same concept really except
it measures the rotation of the driveshaft.  Any news on that experiment?


Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 20:00:11 -0400
From: "Fein, Edward" <fein@strategy.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Re: Clutch (was: ...and AMG S60 race)

>ClutchMasters - I've heard of only one 3S customer where they have
>failed.  I'm not sure if it was stage II or III.  But as far as DSM
>people, they have failed or died prematurely in a few occasions.  A
>little bit overpriced too.  But according to Henry (I believe) this
>clutch has worked great on his 3S car.  I think certain stages (the
>lower ones in particular) are the ones that fail.  So in MHO, I think
>this is an OK company if you go with the most aggressive stage.

I had a Stage II (full-face Kevlar) slip, glaze, and die on me last spring,
with about 6000 miles on it. It happened at the strip, on an abominably hot
day (100+ degrees) and I made a few passes without enough cool-down time,
apparently

I had bought the clutch from, and had it installed by Extreme Motorsports
the previous August. And get this: they and ClutchMasters were nice enough
to upgrade me to the Stage III Kevlar TZ clutch for FREE!

So if you go ClutchMasters, go with the Stage III Kevlar TZ at a minimum,
and I strongly reccomend Extreme Motorsports as a source...

   -Ed
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 20:07:36 -0400
From: "Fein, Edward" <fein@strategy.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: Under-Hood Temps (Was: Engine rebuild update)

>I haven't solved the problem, but have found a (minor) help re:
>under-hood temps.  Remove the rubber weatherstrip that runs along the
>top of the firewall, mating with the back of the hood.  This allows air
>that enters from under the engine to pass by the engine and exit over
>the windshield.

On my '94, the rubber strip is in three sections. I removed the two end
sections, and left the middle to keep the hot air from getting into the air
intake for the passenger compartment. Combined with gutting my pre-cats, I
noticed a considerable drop in underhood temps. Of the two mods, though, I
think gutting the precats had more to do with it, though.

   -Ed
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 19:29:19 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re: VR4 check list

- --------------3816ECFDD1459E2454516334
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Ron-a-roid wrote:

>
>
>      OK guys, I'm making the plunge and need the fine points to
>      look for. Found a 95 VR4 and I'm going to look at Thursday
>      or so to... most likely buy it. The 93SL I have is great but
>      I guess I want _REALLY_ great. I also have never cared for
>      FWD. Besides crunches, bends, shock leaks, tire wear, etc,
>      where are the red flag zones on a VR4? Anxious and
>      excited,Ron-a-roid
>
>      Ron...did you or didn't you...let us know for crying out
>      loud!
>
>      Darc
>


- --------------3816ECFDD1459E2454516334
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
&nbsp;

<P>Ron-a-roid wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>&nbsp;&nbsp;
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>OK
guys, I'm making the plunge and need the fine points to look for. Found
a 95 VR4 and I'm going to look at Thursday or so to... most likely buy
it. The 93SL I have is great but I guess I want _REALLY_ great. I also
have never cared for FWD. Besides crunches, bends, shock leaks, tire wear,
etc, where are the red flag zones on a VR4?</FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Anxious
and excited,</FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Ron-a-roid</FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT></FONT>

<P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Ron...did you or didn't you...let
us know for crying out loud!</FONT></FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1></FONT></FONT>

<P><FONT COLOR="#000000"><FONT SIZE=-1>Darc</FONT></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
&nbsp;
</BODY>
</HTML>

- --------------3816ECFDD1459E2454516334--

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 19:34:57 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Team3S: rebuilds

 Roger and thread followers

What gives with all the broken rings?? Is this the result of detonation
literally blowing them apart/splitting them? Maybe all owner's of  TT's
with after market BC's should consider a water/alchol injection system
until we can solve thi?. Does the TRE MASC improve/solve this problem in
any way Barry?? How about the Venom after market computer upgrade,
anyone?? It seems, as one posting noted, that this is the year of
rebuilds...which is for certain, one way of explaining it, but not
actually coming up with the real solution to the problem.  I for one,
don't have the cash in hand for such undertakings....a BC is a major
event for me at the moment, not a rebuild. A rebuild for me, will be
like Bob's.. sitting in the garage for some time while "I"  work on it.
Now that's not entirely a bad idea, particularly with the help line I
have here...in fact, it actually sounds enjoyable were there some more
change in my jeans. But,  I'd just like to have a little longer to enjoy
driving it.

Darc

92 Stealth TT

Ideas???
The best available water injection unit??

Darc

92 Stealth TT

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 21:49:38 -0500
From: Brad Bedell <bbedell@texas.net>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

- ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDFECF.08CA4140
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have head knock.  When the AFC fuse quit I heard nothing but detonation. 

Looking back on it, I am happy I chose the JE pistons.  With the helmet on, my hearing is limited. (for hearing knock)

With stock pistons, I figure I would have been back into the engine.

> Brad
>
> Check out my home page:    http://lonestar.texas.net/~bbedell
> E-Mail: bbedell@texas.net ICQ#  3612682



- ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDFECF.08CA4140
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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- ------ =_NextPart_000_01BDFECF.08CA4140--

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 20:24:45 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: rebuilds

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of
> wce@bc.sympatico.ca
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 1998 7:35 PM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Team3S: rebuilds
>
>
>  Roger and thread followers
>
> What gives with all the broken rings?? Is this the result of detonation
> literally blowing them apart/splitting them?

That is my contention.

> Maybe all owner's of  TT's with after market BC's should consider a
> water/alchol injection system until we can solve thi?.

That would likely help.  Either that or using proper fuel.

> Does the TRE MASC improve/solve this problem in any way Barry??

The MASC is a fuel computer and actually would exacerbate the issue since by
leaning out the mixture and making more horsepower you may promote
detonation.

> How about the Venom after market computer upgrade,
> anyone?? It seems, as one posting noted, that this is the year of
> rebuilds...which is for certain, one way of explaining it, but not
> actually coming up with the real solution to the problem.  I for one,
> don't have the cash in hand for such undertakings....a BC is a major
> event for me at the moment, not a rebuild. A rebuild for me, will be
> like Bob's.. sitting in the garage for some time while "I"  work on it.
> Now that's not entirely a bad idea, particularly with the help line I
> have here...in fact, it actually sounds enjoyable were there some more
> change in my jeans. But,  I'd just like to have a little longer to enjoy
> driving it.

Detonation is minimized to a point by retarding timing at the expense of
horsepower.  Ideally you want to put timing back in at higher RPMs.  In
order to do so you have to ensure that detonation will not be taking place.
You either turn down the boost or use better fuel.  Water/alcohol injection
will also help to a point.

I don't see how an aftermakret computer is going to eliminate detonation
except by allowing you to tune around it.  Tuning around detonation involves
detuning though, counter to making more horsepower in the first place.

Bottom line, use fuel (which may include injecting water and/or alcohol) to
match cylinder pressures.  That being the case the ECU will leave timing in
thus allowing you to use the additional power.

> Ideas???
> The best available water injection unit??

I know of at least three.  One is manufactured by Spearco.  It is roughly
$155 complete.  The components are not the highest quality and it comes with
only 3 jets.  Bowling Green Customs (thanks to Bob F. for this lead) is
primarily a GN shop.  They make a very nice kit for around $265.  It has a
boost referenced switch for the pump, 5 nozzles, aluminium can with site
handle and all plumbing.

The third company, British-based ERL, makes a few systems ranging in price
from $470 to $930.  Their best uses an actual 3D FI computer to control
injection.  Very cool.  Makes total sense, gives the tuner complete control,
costs you about $1000 for the kit.  The kits are available in the US around
the prices listed.


Regards,

Barry

> Darc
>
> 92 Stealth TT
>



> Darc
>
> 92 Stealth TT
>
> For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
> http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm
>

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 21:59:46 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Team3S: rebuilds

Barry;

The quality and advice within your posts, is impeccable. That's not to take anything
away from the absolute first class posts I am continually overwhelmed with here. Thanks
all of you, but Barry of late, for sharing those who shared with you. As an old book
"The Education of Little Tree" indicated...when you find something good, share it ,
'cause there ain't no way o' telling where it's ultimate good will go...but it'll run to
good, that's fer sure.

I still can't get over the first rate bunch of guys here...and if anyone accuses me of
patronizing, I may piss on yer leg and tell ya it's raining.

Darc

You all know what I drive.

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 22:13:21 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Team3S: Abbreviations

Can someone take a minute and run by the abbreviations we are using for
standard fare here? Or maybe we can start a group contribution list!!  I
am starting to think my brains have fallen out on the floor,  and I have
commenced a sweep and search operation for them. Seriously, a posting on
pertinent abbreviations for 3S topics would likely be appreciated by
more than myself  I am sure.....The ole "what the
hell....uhhh...mmm...oh yeah I  get it now" (sometimes),  just uses up
too much of my bio-hard-drive. ....and then there's all that Net 'brev
talk that makes you wonder if you were born yesterday!

Darc

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 01:42:04 -0400
From: "Ron-a-roid" <rtetetet@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re: VR4 check list

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0425_01BDFEEF.80ACF7A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Been out of town ... going to see it Saturday morning ... yeah, I think =
so ...
    -----Original Message-----
    From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca <wce@bc.sympatico.ca>
    To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com <stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com>
    Date: Friday, October 23, 1998 10:34 PM
    Subject: Re: Team3S: Re: VR4 check list
   =20
   =20
     =20
    Ron-a-roid wrote:=20

          =20
            OK guys, I'm making the plunge and need the fine points to =
look for. Found a 95 VR4 and I'm going to look at Thursday or so to... =
most likely buy it. The 93SL I have is great but I guess I want _REALLY_ =
great. I also have never cared for FWD. Besides crunches, bends, shock =
leaks, tire wear, etc, where are the red flag zones on a VR4? Anxious =
and excited,Ron-a-roid=20
            Ron...did you or didn't you...let us know for crying out =
loud!=20

            Darc

     =20

- ------=_NextPart_000_0425_01BDFEEF.80ACF7A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>

<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.2106.6"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 face=3D"" size=3D2><FONT face=3DArial>Been =
out of town ...=20
going to see it Saturday morning ... yeah, I think so =
...</FONT></FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial></FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: =
5px">
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Original =
Message-----</B><BR><B>From:=20
    </B><A href=3D"mailto:wce@bc.sympatico.ca">wce@bc.sympatico.ca</A> =
&lt;<A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:wce@bc.sympatico.ca">wce@bc.sympatico.ca</A>&gt;<BR><B>To:=
=20
    </B><A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com">stealth-3000gt@list.sirius=
.com</A>=20
    &lt;<A=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com">stealth-3000gt@list.sirius=
.com</A>&gt;<BR><B>Date:=20
    </B>Friday, October 23, 1998 10:34 PM<BR><B>Subject: </B>Re: Team3S: =
Re: VR4=20
    check list<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>&nbsp;=20
    <P>Ron-a-roid wrote:=20
    <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE =3D CITE>&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
        <BLOCKQUOTE=20
        style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><FONT=20
            color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D-1>OK guys, I'm making the =
plunge and need=20
            the fine points to look for. Found a 95 VR4 and I'm going to =
look at=20
            Thursday or so to... most likely buy it. The 93SL I have is =
great=20
            but I guess I want _REALLY_ great. I also have never cared =
for FWD.=20
            Besides crunches, bends, shock leaks, tire wear, etc, where =
are the=20
            red flag zones on a VR4?</FONT></FONT>&nbsp;<FONT=20
            color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D-1>Anxious and =
excited,</FONT></FONT><FONT=20
            color=3D#000000><FONT =
size=3D-1>Ron-a-roid</FONT></FONT><FONT=20
            color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D-1></FONT></FONT>=20
            <P><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D-1>Ron...did you or =
didn't=20
            you...let us know for crying out loud!</FONT></FONT><FONT=20
            color=3D#000000><FONT size=3D-1></FONT></FONT>=20
            <P><FONT color=3D#000000><FONT=20
    size=3D-1>Darc</FONT></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE>&nbsp;=20
</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0425_01BDFEEF.80ACF7A0--


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:12:56 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

Roger Gerl wrote:
>
> The Mitsu experts say that the car must have had very heavy bad knock. IMHO, due
> to the leaking sunroof on high speeds I never heard anything as I drove around
> 290km/h on the German Autobahns. But I'm sure I killed it on such high power,
> long run, high temp circumstances :(


Barry E. King wrote:
>
> The stock ECU combats knock in two ways  When knock is first detected the
> ECU retards timing.  Usually this is enough.  When retarding the timing
> doesn't cut it the next step is to signal the stock boost solenoid to open
> the wastegates.  On a car equipped with an aftermarket electronic boost
> controller this feature of course has no effect.

As we all know, those with the Blitz controller are able to
sustain higher boost at the upper RPMs than those of us with
other controllers, such as my AVC-R, which falls to about
.9 bar at 6500 RPM).  Is it possible that the Blitz controller
is actually overdriving the stock injectors to maintain such
boost levels, resulting in a lean condition and leading to
some of the problems Roger is seeing on his engine?  Or is
it more likely that what he is seeing is from his pre-Blitz
over-boosting?

The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline?

The other question: if this is the case, how is the AVC-R
able to prevent this and keep boost lower at these RPMs?

-Jim
- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph <- KNOCKING?!
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:18:37 +0100
From: "R.G." <robby@swissonline.ch>
Subject: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> Is it possible that the Blitz controller
> is actually overdriving the stock injectors to maintain such
> boost levels, resulting in a lean condition and leading to
> some of the problems Roger is seeing on his engine?

The BC can only control the boost via the wastegates and nothing else.

With the max sustained boost set to 1.05bars I had no problem to keep the EGTs
on a normal level during the dyno sessions. But during the runs it was the first
time I saw this white oil-steam comming out the BOV ! This tells me that the car
was weak before the BC and got even weaker as I overboosted easily to 1.34 bars
with running into fuel cut then. I had no fuel cut up to 1.26bars but I felt
some hesitation (timing retarded). Interestingly, we leaned it out a little with
the help of the AFC and the hesitation went away. The car runned like hell. But
the dyno session then told me the truth and limiting to 1.05bars helped. But the
car got weaker and weaker !

> Or is it more likely that what he is seeing is from his pre-Blitz
> over-boosting?

I tell this "early Blitz overboosting".... I just didn't use the limiter. Call
this ignorance and power-adrenaline-kick. This was before the AFC as I installed
it because I wanted to get rid of the problems at high boost. Well, I think it
was too late as the oil spray was already there. Also I would not be able to
increase fuel because fuel cut kicked in with only +5% more fuel. This would
only make sense with using bigger injectors.

> The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
> extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline?

Yes, they can. If fuel is not miss-used to cool the chambers then they provide
enough on their spray.

> The other question: if this is the case, how is the AVC-R
> able to prevent this and keep boost lower at these RPMs?

Well, just a theory :

The AVC-R reads the injectors duty cycle as well as boost (also rpms ??). This
with its learning feature are the advantages of it. Maybe it "sees" that on high
boost the injectors start to go close to the 100% and therefore reduces boost
(and adjusts the internal stored curve). This could explain the behaivour. Other
ideas ??

- -----------------------
Roger Gerl, Switzerland
93'3000GT TwinTurbo (Animale Rosso)

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 12:42:52 EDT
From: LotoBoost@aol.com
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

In a message dated 98-10-24 04:11:06 EDT, you write:

<< As we all know, those with the Blitz controller are able to
 sustain higher boost at the upper RPMs than those of us with
 other controllers, such as my AVC-R, which falls to about
 .9 bar at 6500 RPM).  Is it possible that the Blitz controller
 is actually overdriving the stock injectors to maintain such
 boost levels, resulting in a lean condition and leading to
 some of the problems Roger is seeing on his engine?  Or is
 it more likely that what he is seeing is from his pre-Blitz
 over-boosting?>>

In theory, the Blitz boost controller shouldn't hold any more boost through
redline than any other controller because they all do the same thing.. control
the wastegate.  I haven't heard the story's from people who own Blitz
controllers running more boost, but if they are holding more boost through
redline vs. other controllers than maybe it has more to do with that persons
exhuast set-up.  With full cats and stock downpipe my car held more boost
through redline than it did with the main cat gutted and downpipe.
 
 <<The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
 extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline??>>

With 15G's, I've run 1.0bar during extended HW runs (70mph to 150mph).  It
gets things on the lean side, but shouldn't hurt anything.  Stock turbos at
1.0bar should be a little easier on the fuel I'd think.  If you shift to 5th
gear, however, I'd keep a close eye on the EGT's.
 
Mike Mahaffey - '94 Stealth tt Best et: 11.6  Best mph: 120.7
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 09:51:28 -0700
From: wce@bc.sympatico.ca
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

R.G. wrote:

> > Is it possible that the Blitz controller
> > is actually overdriving the stock injectors to maintain such
> > boost levels, resulting in a lean condition and leading to
> > some of the problems Roger is seeing on his engine?
>
> The BC can only control the boost via the wastegates and nothing else.

Agreed. But by doing this, (controlling from the bottom end) is it not inadventantly
controlling the injector duty as well, and hence overdriving them as Jim suggests? Open
the flood gates, and the stream is hard pressed to fill the  exiting resevoir.

                                              <snip>

> > The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
> > extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline?
>
> Yes, they can. If fuel is not miss-used to cool the chambers then they provide
> enough on their spray.

So wouldn't the old solution, recently revived here, be of an advantage...ie: water
injection?? Has anyone heard if this application has long term side effects with use??

>
>
> > The other question: if this is the case, how is the AVC-R
> > able to prevent this and keep boost lower at these RPMs?
>
> Well, just a theory : (Yep, so is relativity)
>
> The AVC-R reads the injectors duty cycle as well as boost (also rpms ??). This
> with its learning feature are the advantages of it. Maybe it "sees" that on high
> boost the injectors start to go close to the 100% and therefore reduces boost
> (and adjusts the internal stored curve). This could explain the behaivour. Other
> ideas ??

This sounds like the most plausible explanation Roger...but as you know, I haven't even
put my BC in the car yet...it is somewhere in transit to here. But, I hope to be able to
advise a bit on Apexi as time goes on, so that along with Jim and Errin we will have an
Apexi forum for comparison with all you Blitz guys. Given your advice and Chens' (along
with others who own it) I thought Blitz was more of a race application BC with all of
it's features when I was comparitive shopping, and Apexi was an install and drive
(street) application. It probably wouldn't hurt to install a water/alcohal injection
system with either given the recent thread. My opinion only.

Darc (Darcy Gunnlaugson)

Victoria, B.C.    92 Stealth TT


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 10:14:57 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of Jim Matthews
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 1:13 AM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update


<snip>

> As we all know, those with the Blitz controller are able to
> sustain higher boost at the upper RPMs than those of us with
> other controllers, such as my AVC-R, which falls to about
> .9 bar at 6500 RPM).

Almost everyone.  I spoke with one person that observed the same behavior
that anyone else with 9Bs experiences -- boost drop-off approaching redline.
I should have asked for their settings so that they could be compared with
those which allow this higher RPM boost that noone else seems to enjoy  ;)

> Is it possible that the Blitz controller is actually overdriving
> the stock injectors to maintain such boost levels, resulting in a
> lean condition and leading to some of the problems Roger is seeing
> on his engine?  Or is it more likely that what he is seeing is from
> his pre-Blitz over-boosting?

The injector behavior is comlpetely determined by the ECU which does not
read boost.  Factors that determine fuel flow (and therefore IDC) are intake
air temperature, water temperature, airflow, barometric pressure, timing,
RPM and entropy introduced by Mitsu engineers (that last one is supposed to
be a joke btw).

I would not place fault with the DSBC itself -- I believe it to be a fine
boost controller.

> The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
> extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline?

All other factors being equal, yes.  Some experts suggest not running pintel
style injectors beyond 80% IDC.  This is due to the stress placed on the
electromagnetic valve.  Maybe it gets too hot.  In any case it is claimed
that an injector operating beyond 80% is prone to becoming stuck open.  I
suspect that they mean "80% for extended periods of time".  I personally
don't get concerned until I see a number well above 90%.  Anyone seeing much
above that should be concerned.

This is the beginning of yet another thread ;)

IDC is only one indicator of fuel delivery.  One thing that isn't discussed
much is fuel pressure.  Injectors require around 35-40 PSI to operate.  When
pulling vaccuum at idle or during light right-footed cruising, fuel pressure
can be a little lower than what the injectors require since the pressure
differential is actually pulling fuel through.  Positive manifold pressure
(when under boost) pushes against the fuel being delivered by the injectors.
The net effect is reduced fuel pressure at the injector. So, to maintain the
35-40 PSI fuel pressure at the injector you require 1 PSI additional fuel
pressure to compensate for each additional PSI in boost.

At 15 PSI you need up to 55 PSI at the injectors.  Here's where it starts to
get interesting.  The stock fuel pump is rated at 180 lph @ 43 PSI assuming
stock wiring (ie roughly 12v to the pump).  At 55 PSI the pump can deliver
only 140 lph.

So, assuming 15 PSI and a relatively stock VR4 making roughly 340 HP, you
need 128 lph from the pump.  The stock pump should be up to the task but
just barely.

A few other factors come into play.  If you measure the voltage available at
the fuel pump it won't be 12v.  It will likely be between 10v and 12v.
Below 12v means a less efficient pump.  This is why some people wire battery
power directly to the fuel pump through a relay operated by the FPR.  Doing
so you'll get very close to 14v at the pump and increased fuel delivery
capacity.

15Gs and larger injectors introduce more complications.  I suppose fuel
delivery is really another thread.  If anyone is interested just post and we
can get it going.


> The other question: if this is the case, how is the AVC-R
> able to prevent this and keep boost lower at these RPMs?

The AVC-R does not control the injectors.  It merely displays the IDC as
indicated by the ECU output.  The duty cycle setting on the AVC-R is the
wastegate actuator duty cycle.

> -Jim


<snip>


Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 10:24:10 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of R.G.
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 6:19 AM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

<snipped>

> Well, just a theory :
>
> The AVC-R reads the injectors duty cycle as well as boost (also
> rpms ??). This with its learning feature are the advantages of it.
> Maybe it  "sees" that on high boost the injectors start to go close
> to the 100% and therefore  reduces boost (and adjusts the internal
> stored curve). This could explain the  behaivour. Other ideas ??

I do not believe this to be the case.  I recently installed the TRE MASC and
spent about a week intimately tuning the car.  During the latter stages of
tuning I used good fuel and was limiting boost with the AVC-R at 20 PSI.  I
was able to achieve 20 PSI regardless of IDC.  At some points I hit 94% IDC
and still reached 20 PSI.  When the engine is really rich higher boost
levels may not be achieved but that has more to do with inefficient
combustion than anything else.  Based on my observations, I do not believe
the AVC-R reduces boost based on IDC.

If it does I'd certainly like to know when it decides to knock back boost.
That would be a factor in choosing injector size.

BTW, now that I have the MASC I have the ability to set EGT and boost
alarms.  The AVC-R was set to 1.35 BAR (19.6 PSI).  The overboost alarm was
typically set to 20 PSI.  It did not go off even once at that setting.
Setting it to 19 PSI made tripped it every time.  In other words, the AVC-R
was always able to achieve desired boost without overboosting by even 0.4
PSI.  Not bad.  I wouldn't expect any controller to be quite that accurate.


Regards,

Barry

> -----------------------
> Roger Gerl, Switzerland
> 93'3000GT TwinTurbo (Animale Rosso)
>
> For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is
http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 10:36:52 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of
> wce@bc.sympatico.ca
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 9:51 AM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

<snipped>

> So wouldn't the old solution, recently revived here, be of an
> advantage...ie: water injection?? Has anyone heard if this
> application has long term side effects with use??

Alcohol is a rather corrosive substance as is water.  The potential exists
for oxidation of metal parts, especially aluminium.  However, if you keep
the amount of water/alcohol injected within reasonable limits you should not
experience any long term side-effects since the alcohol will be burned and
the water will be spewed out as vapor.  A properly designed exhaust system
will keep exhaust temperatures high enough throughout the entire system to
keep condensation of vapors (present anyway as a byproduct of combustion) to
a minimum.

This is actually fuel against the "bigger is better" myth when it comes to
fiorced induction exhaust systems which some people pursue with religous
zealousy.  You can't consider solely the diameter of tubing of an exhaust
system.  The length gases must travel msut also be considered.  Hehe.  Here
we go on another thread...

<snipped>

> Given your advice and Chens' (along with others who own it) I thought
> Blitz was more of a race application BC with all of it's features when
> I was comparitive shopping, and Apexi was an install and drive
> (street) application.

I don't know that the AVC-R is any more or less of a race application than
any other controller.  The AVC-R lacks a scramble setting, but realisticaly
that is more of a street feature than a race feature.  It has two boost
settings which is more or less standard fair.  One for "normal" putting
around and one for hauling.  Personally I find myself leaving it at the
highest setting all the time since you really control the amount of boost
with your right foot anyway.  If your foot is pressing the accelerator
against the floorboard, why not have full boost available?  ;)

For pure racing applications the Apex'i AVC-D is probably the right choice.
I doubt it would make a practical street boost controller.


<snipped>

> Darc (Darcy Gunnlaugson)



Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 19:09:21 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Team3S: Smoke from pipes

Today Mike and I had a little European micro-gathering (only
two cars!).  On the way home, he noticed a puff of black smoke
from both of my stock exhaust pipes when I downshifted and
stomped on the gas.  His note and my reply are below.  I'd
appreciate any insight any of you might have.  Thanx!

-Jim

Jim Matthews wrote:
>
> Mike Chapleski wrote:
> >
> >     Just wanted to let you know I saw some smoke coming out of your
> > exhaust.  When we were on 455 coming up the hill before getting on 66 I
> > think you stomped on it.  I say this because there was puff of smoke
> > that came out of both sides of the exhaust, then you were off.  I
> > thought uh oh, oil, but when I drove through it, it smelled like gas.
> > Sort of like you were running real rich.  I could smell it for a while,
> > till we got on 66 then it went away.  I guess all that traffic driving
> > allowed some gas to build up in the system and punching it blew it out.
> > I was thinking about it and I am not sure why this would happen.   I am
> > thinking the smaller spark plug gap might have something to do with it.
> > (what did you say they were gapped at? .032?).  Don't think it is a
> > problem, just wanted to let you know.
>
> You THINK I stomped on it?!  Now THAT's humbling!  :-)
>
> Interesting.  Thanx for pointing it out, as this is exactly the
> sort of thing I'd never be able to see and that other friends
> wouldn't think to bring up if they saw it.  Actually, I think
> this may be normal.  On my way down to Switzerland to see
> Roger, I came up behind a Porche 911 Turbo.  When the traffic
> in front cleared, the guy hammered the throttle and puffs of
> black smoke came out of each pipe (no more than a puff).  Is
> this what you saw, or was there more?  I asked Roger about it
> when I got there and he said that this is normal with turbo
> cars.  Maybe Maximum Boost will have something to say about
> this.  All I can imagine is that the fuel being injected is
> too much before the turbos spool up and provide enough air,
> especially when at wide open throttle (see below).  I think
> my gap is around .035, at least when the tuneup was done
> 20k miles ago.
>
> One thing I have noticed lately though is that the car seems
> to have stronger acceleration when I'm just under wide open
> throttle vs. the pedal all the way to the floor.  My theory
> is that WOT causes the car to dump fuel in as fast as possible,
> causing an over-rich condition, whereas just inder WOT leans
> the mixture out properly.  The fact that you smelled gas until
> we hit 66 would seem to support this theory, as I do remember
> flooring it.  Again, more gauges and a dyno are in order here!!
>
> It's also interesting that you saw the smoke out of BOTH tail
> pipes, as I didn't think that passenger-side pipe actually
> flowed much exhaust.  Was it noticably more from the driver-
> side pipe?
>
> At any rate, I'm relieved that you didn't smell oil, as that's
> the last thing I need to worry about right now!  BTW, it was
> a lot of fun driving along with two nearly identical cars of
> such rarity in this area!  Just imagine 50+ on the way to the
> Mitsubishi factory!  Maybe I'll give that guy from the German
> GTO club a call in case he lost my number...

- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 19:24:09 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

Barry E. King wrote:
>
> Roger Gerl wrote:
> >
> > > Jim Matthews wrote:
> > >
> > > The other question: if this is the case, how is the AVC-R
> > > able to prevent this and keep boost lower at these RPMs?
> >
> > Well, just a theory :
> >
> > The AVC-R reads the injectors duty cycle as well as boost (also
> > rpms ??). This with its learning feature are the advantages of it.
> > Maybe it  "sees" that on high boost the injectors start to go close
> > to the 100% and therefore  reduces boost (and adjusts the internal
> > stored curve). This could explain the  behaivour. Other ideas ??
>
> I do not believe this to be the case.  I recently installed the TRE MASC and
> spent about a week intimately tuning the car.  During the latter stages of
> tuning I used good fuel and was limiting boost with the AVC-R at 20 PSI.  I
> was able to achieve 20 PSI regardless of IDC.  At some points I hit 94% IDC
> and still reached 20 PSI.  When the engine is really rich higher boost
> levels may not be achieved but that has more to do with inefficient
> combustion than anything else.  Based on my observations, I do not believe
> the AVC-R reduces boost based on IDC.
>
> If it does I'd certainly like to know when it decides to knock back boost.
> That would be a factor in choosing injector size.

Well, you guys have a lot more experience with this than I,
but my observations support Roger's theory.  When my AVC-R
sees the IDC get above 90%, it starts blinking, and this
is when the boost level starts decreasing.  It appears as
if the AVC-R sees that the injectors are close to maxing out
and starts bleeding off some of the pressure to keep things
in check.

If this is the case, then is the Blitz failing to prevent
a dangerous situation?

BTW, Barry, it sounds like you're doing some impressive
testing!!  Remember, the AVC-R only goes up to 2.0 bar!  :-)

-Jim
- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 19:28:07 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

LotoBoost@aol.com wrote:
>
> Jim Matthews wrote:
> >
> > The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
> > extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline??
>
> With 15G's, I've run 1.0bar during extended HW runs (70mph to 150mph).  It
> gets things on the lean side, but shouldn't hurt anything.  Stock turbos at
> 1.0bar should be a little easier on the fuel I'd think.  If you shift to 5th
> gear, however, I'd keep a close eye on the EGT's.

Why would bigger turbos change the mixture at the same boost
pressure?  1.0 bar is 1.0 bar, right?  I would think the 15Gs
would simply spool up a bit slower and hold EGTs down at the
same boost and mixture...

-Jim
- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph
For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 11:30:11 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of Jim Matthews
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 11:24 AM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update


> Well, you guys have a lot more experience with this than I,
> but my observations support Roger's theory.  When my AVC-R
> sees the IDC get above 90%, it starts blinking, and this
> is when the boost level starts decreasing.  It appears as
> if the AVC-R sees that the injectors are close to maxing out
> and starts bleeding off some of the pressure to keep things
> in check.

While it is possible the SAVC-R has this feature I have not seen reference
to it in any literature.  You'd think a feature like this would be bragged
about.  In any case, I would think that with stock blowers and high RPMs
where you are no doubt seeing these high IDCs you'll be seeing boost drop
off anyway.

I have 15Gs and 550cc injectors.  However I still hit 92% IDC (and sometimes
higher).  I have never observed the boost dropping off.  Once the boost hits
20 PSI on my car it stays there until I lift regardless of RPM or IDC
achieved.

> If this is the case, then is the Blitz failing to prevent
> a dangerous situation?

I wouldn't knock the Blitz too much.  Although a nice safety feature
(presuming it does indeed exists) the boost controller shouldn't really be
responsible for controlling fuel.  If there is a fuel delivery issue that
should be addressed separately.

> BTW, Barry, it sounds like you're doing some impressive
> testing!!  Remember, the AVC-R only goes up to 2.0 bar!  :-)

Haha.  I doubt I'll ever be running THAT much  ;)

> -Jim



Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 11:56:44 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

Bigger turbos increase air flow.  More air means more fuel required.  If you
don't change the fuel you'll have a leaner mixture, even at the same boost
as a smaller turbo.  Boost by itself does not determine mixture.

The point of larger turbos is not to raise boost but to increase the amount
of air flowed at a given boost.  The side benefit is that larger turbos also
can achieve higher boost levels and hold it lopnger throughout the RPM
range.

A stock 9B flows roughly 265 CFM @ 15 PSI.  An unported 15G will flow
roughly 404 CFM @ 15 PSI.  The stock turbo is capable of delivering 530 CFM
versus the 808 CFM of the 15G at the same boost of 15 PSI.  Big difference.
Actual airflow through the combustion chamber will vary on other factors,
but I'm sure you get the point.

Combustion temperatures (and therefore EGT) is dependant solely on mixture
and the efficiency of the combustion.  Exactly where EGT is measured can
also make a significant difference.  Ideally you want the pyrometer 10" from
the flame front.  This isn't always possible.  Consider also the distance
from each exhaust port in a mutli-cyclinder application to a single
pyrometer.  Heat is some aggregate of each hole with furthest cylinders
contributing less than the closest ones.  We're starting to split hairs here
but the point is when comparing numbers all this needs to be at least
considered.

On my roadrace bikes each cylinder had a separate pyrometer.  Ideally they'd
run at the same temperatures but the reality is they do not.  This is a good
reason for balancing injectors to individual cylinders and also having the
ability to tune fuel delivery to an individual cylinder.

It is a myth that a turbocharged engine "runs hotter" than an NA engine.  A
t/c engine typically produces higher underhood temperatures for other
reasons but that is not the same as the temperature of combustion.
Combustion temperatures at the flame front approach 2000 F for a well tuned
high performance 4-stroke gasoline engine.  Fuel is still fuel, air is still
air and metal melts at the same temperatures regardless of the method of
induction.


Regards,

Barry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of Jim Matthews
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 11:28 AM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update
>
>
> LotoBoost@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > Jim Matthews wrote:
> > >
> > > The bottom line: can the stock injectors flow enough fuel for
> > > extended durations at 1.0 bar at near redline??
> >
> > With 15G's, I've run 1.0bar during extended HW runs (70mph to
> 150mph).  It
> > gets things on the lean side, but shouldn't hurt anything.
> Stock turbos at
> > 1.0bar should be a little easier on the fuel I'd think.  If you
> shift to 5th
> > gear, however, I'd keep a close eye on the EGT's.
>
> Why would bigger turbos change the mixture at the same boost
> pressure?  1.0 bar is 1.0 bar, right?  I would think the 15Gs
> would simply spool up a bit slower and hold EGTs down at the
> same boost and mixture...
>
> -Jim

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:22:02 -0400
From: "Ron-a-roid" <rtetetet@email.msn.com>
Subject: Team3S: Re:  VR4 Advice please

>OK guys, I'm making the plunge and need the fine points to look for. Found
a
>95 VR4 and I'm going to look at Thursday or so to... most likely buy it.
The
>93SL I have is great but I guess I want _REALLY_ great. I also have never
>cared for FWD. Besides crunches, bends, shock leaks, tire wear, etc, where
>are the red flag zones on a VR4?


I checked the car out and it looks good, a few more dings than I like and
car wash swirls. (3 rt side door dents, 2 rear 1/4, 1 front:-( )
NO leaks, no heat marks under hood, all repair records, good rubber, no
shock leaks, rims in good shape, smooth trany up & down, good power,
consistent boost, solid no rattles or thumps in drive train or suspension.
Active aero thumps when it levels out at under 35.

Two things concern me;
1. The brakes are spongy, I can pin the pedal to the floor. They stop good
but not as good as my SL as far as raw stopping power. Probably because the
system is spongy. Has not had brake line recall done. Anti lock light blinks
3 times at start up, not a solid 4 - 6 second light like my 93 SL.

2. The car has had Valvoline 10-30w in it all the changes he had receipts
for from the dealer. I would have preferred to see Mobil1 or a synthetic and
would want to change to synthetic after purchase. I have read that changing
from petroleum to synthetic can induce seal shrinkage and possible leaks
later on. Anybody else heard of this and have knowledge of it?

The car is a 95 VR4, Danube Blue, 18" chromies, Michelin tires, Infinity
stereo, BIG sun roof, leather, etc.
34,700 mi's, AWD, AWS, All the goodies. Asking $26,500.

Ron





For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 20:43:10 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Re: Team3S: Re:  VR4 Advice please

Ron-a-roid wrote:
>
> The car is a 95 VR4, Danube Blue, 18" chromies, Michelin tires, Infinity
> stereo, BIG sun roof, leather, etc.
> 34,700 mi's, AWD, AWS, All the goodies. Asking $26,500.

Sounds a bit steep.  The car you are looking at sounds
very similar to my '94 when I bought it in 96.  Same
mileage, no sunroof or active aero (Stealth), alloy wheels,
black, fewer dings, $20k.  I'd ask them to take care of
the swirls.  The brakes may feel spongier than your SL
due to the additional weight.  My pedal goes to the floor
as well (braided lines).  My car also had dino oil and
switching to synthetics caused no noticable ill effects.

I'd try for closer to $20. -Jim

- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 21:20:32 +0100
From: Jim Matthews <matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de>
Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

Barry E. King wrote:
>
> Jim Matthews wrote:
> >
> > Well, you guys have a lot more experience with this than I,
> > but my observations support Roger's theory.  When my AVC-R
> > sees the IDC get above 90%, it starts blinking, and this
> > is when the boost level starts decreasing.  It appears as
> > if the AVC-R sees that the injectors are close to maxing out
> > and starts bleeding off some of the pressure to keep things
> > in check.
>
> While it is possible the SAVC-R has this feature I have not seen reference
> to it in any literature.  You'd think a feature like this would be bragged
> about.  In any case, I would think that with stock blowers and high RPMs
> where you are no doubt seeing these high IDCs you'll be seeing boost drop
> off anyway.

Just took a look at the SAVC-R docs on A'PEXi's web page.
Unfortunately, they aren't very revealing (or well-written),
but I did find these statements:


http://www.apexi-usa.com/docsavcr10.htm

"The display will begin to flash if the injectors reach
over 98% capacity." (so what?)


http://www.apexi-usa.com/docsavcr12.htm

"Although this unit has a RPM separate self learning function,
vehicles maximizing their injectors by 6200 RPM will not be able
to use the self learning function during that period because
the unit uses the injector signal to read the engine RPM for
the self learning function.  In order to have more precise
boost control, the solution to this problem is to upgrade to
higher capacity injectors."


http://www.apexi-usa.com/esavc.htm

The A'pex Super AVC-R is one of the most technologically
     advanced boost controllers on the market yet, it is one of the
     most easiest to use. The Super AVC-R is the only boost
     controller that integrates injector pulse monitoring and
     increases boost response. The unit is "self learning" (unlike
     fuzzy logic with its dangerous "calibration"). This unit utilizes a
     solenoid actuator valve to control boost, similar to the ones
     used on the turbocharged Honda F-1 race cars. It is a closed
     loop type boost controller that has its own pressure sensor to
     compensate for atmospheric changes and maintain steady boost levels
at all altitudes. The Super
     AVC-R has a sophisticated appearance that features two user preset
modes--A & B for on the fly
     adjustments and RPM specific overshoot protection for boost
stability. The Super AVC-R is universal
     for most boost-dependent applications with an internal or external
type wastegate.


> > If this is the case, then is the Blitz failing to prevent
> > a dangerous situation?
>
> I wouldn't knock the Blitz too much.  Although a nice safety feature
> (presuming it does indeed exists) the boost controller shouldn't really be
> responsible for controlling fuel.  If there is a fuel delivery issue that
> should be addressed separately.

Not trying to knock it, just trying to figure out what is
going on.  Would the AVC-R also be able to hold 1.0 bar
at redline like the Blitz if all of the other mods were the
same?  I don't understand why one controller would be able
to sustain boost better than another.  It must be that my
stock exhaust is simply too restrictive.

-Jim
- --
Matthews - Wiesbaden, Germany
matthews@wiesbaden.netsurf.de (64 Kbps ISDN)
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews

*** 3000GT-Stealth International (3Si) Member #0030 ***
http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~matthews/stealth.html
Jet Black '94 Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo AWD AWS 6-spd
Adjustable Active Suspension, Adjustable Exhaust System
K&N FIPK, A'PEXi Super AVC-R (1.0 bar @ 70/84% BADC)
A'PEXi Turbo Timer (30 sec), Bosch Winged Wipers
Magnecore spark plug wires, Redline ShockProof fluids
Metal Matrix brake pads, custom braided brake lines
Michelin Pilot XGT-Z4 245/45ZR17, TS (so far): 166mph
G-Tech Pro: 0-60 4.79 sec, 1/4 13.16 sec @ 113.9 mph


For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 14:26:13 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> [mailto:owner-stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com]On Behalf Of Jim Matthews
> Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 1:21 PM
> To: stealth-3000gt@list.sirius.com
> Subject: Re: Team3S: RE: boost lag, engine rebuild update

<snip>

> Just took a look at the SAVC-R docs on A'PEXi's web page.
> Unfortunately, they aren't very revealing (or well-written),
> but I did find these statements:
>
>
> http://www.apexi-usa.com/docsavcr10.htm
>
> "The display will begin to flash if the injectors reach
> over 98% capacity." (so what?)

Visual clue that you're heading into the danger zone.

> http://www.apexi-usa.com/docsavcr12.htm
>
> "Although this unit has a RPM separate self learning function,
> vehicles maximizing their injectors by 6200 RPM will not be able
> to use the self learning function during that period because
> the unit uses the injector signal to read the engine RPM for
> the self learning function.  In order to have more precise
> boost control, the solution to this problem is to upgrade to
> higher capacity injectors."

<snip>

> Not trying to knock it, just trying to figure out what is
> going on.

Understood.  Did not intend to imply otherwise.

> Would the AVC-R also be able to hold 1.0 bar
> at redline like the Blitz if all of the other mods were the
> same?  I don't understand why one controller would be able
> to sustain boost better than another.  It must be that my
> stock exhaust is simply too restrictive.

Based on what you found, it makes sense that the AVC-R would allow bleed
down under high IDC situations.  From that blurb it appears that the AVC-R
simply doesn't learn the boost curve in those circumstances whereas the DSBC
can since it is not considering the IDC.

Since tuning in the MASC I haven't been reaching above 98% (typically hit
92-94% -- still too high IMO) so I would not have experienced this
situation.  Kind of a nice safety feature actually.

> -Jim


Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Oct 1998 15:27:57 -0700
From: "Barry E. King" <beking@home.com>
Subject: RE: Team3S: AVC-R tuning (WAS: boost lag, engine rebuild update)

It occurred to me that in order to allow the AVC-R to learn maximum boost
without one would need to get it to learn the maximum boost at an IDC less
than what it considers dangerous.  To do this you'd have to choose the next
highest gear and with the goal of achieving maximum desired boost before
running into the RPM and IDC ceilings.

It wouldn't be practical for me to try this (I'd have to at least reinstall
stock injectors and probably the stock turbos <grin>) but perhaps you or
someone else with an AVC-R and a stockish car could could experiement with
this approach.


Regards,

Barry

For subscribe/unsubscribe info, our web page is http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm

------------------------------

End of Team3S Digest V1 #6
**************************

For unsubscribe info and FAQ, see our web page at http://www.bobforrest.com/Team3S.htm